File Download

There are no files associated with this item.

  Links for fulltext
     (May Require Subscription)
Supplementary

Article: Dissociating the Influence of Affective Word Content and Cognitive Processing Demands on the Late Positive Potential

TitleDissociating the Influence of Affective Word Content and Cognitive Processing Demands on the Late Positive Potential
Authors
KeywordsPermutation test
Emotion
Event-related potential (ERP)
Late positive potential (LPP)
P300
Residue iteration decomposition (RIDE)
Issue Date2016
Citation
Brain Topography, 2016, v. 29, n. 1, p. 82-93 How to Cite?
Abstract© 2015, Springer Science+Business Media New York. The late positive potential (LPP) elicited by affective stimuli in the event-related brain potential (ERP) is often assumed to be a member of the P3 family. The present study addresses the relationship of the LPP to the classic P3b in a published data set, using a non-parametric permutation test for topographical comparisons, and residue iteration decomposition to assess the temporal features of the LPP and the P3b by decomposing the ERP into several component clusters according to their latency variability. The experiment orthogonally manipulated arousal and valence of words, which were either read or judged for lexicality. High-arousing and positive valenced words induced a larger LPP than low-arousing and negative valenced words, respectively, and t he LDT elicited a larger P3b than reading. The experimental manipulation of arousal, valence, and task yielded main effects without any interactions on ERP amplitude in the LPP/P3b time range. The arousal and valence effects partially differed from the task effect in scalp topography; in addition, whereas the late positive component elicited by affective stimuli, defined as LPP, was stimulus-locked, the late positive component elicited by task demand, defined as P3b, was mainly latency-variable. Therefore LPP and P3b manifest different subcomponents.
Persistent Identifierhttp://hdl.handle.net/10722/246823
ISSN
2023 Impact Factor: 2.3
2023 SCImago Journal Rankings: 0.863
ISI Accession Number ID

 

DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorNowparast Rostami, Hadiseh-
dc.contributor.authorOuyang, Guang-
dc.contributor.authorBayer, Mareike-
dc.contributor.authorSchacht, Annekathrin-
dc.contributor.authorZhou, Changsong-
dc.contributor.authorSommer, Werner-
dc.date.accessioned2017-09-26T04:28:05Z-
dc.date.available2017-09-26T04:28:05Z-
dc.date.issued2016-
dc.identifier.citationBrain Topography, 2016, v. 29, n. 1, p. 82-93-
dc.identifier.issn0896-0267-
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10722/246823-
dc.description.abstract© 2015, Springer Science+Business Media New York. The late positive potential (LPP) elicited by affective stimuli in the event-related brain potential (ERP) is often assumed to be a member of the P3 family. The present study addresses the relationship of the LPP to the classic P3b in a published data set, using a non-parametric permutation test for topographical comparisons, and residue iteration decomposition to assess the temporal features of the LPP and the P3b by decomposing the ERP into several component clusters according to their latency variability. The experiment orthogonally manipulated arousal and valence of words, which were either read or judged for lexicality. High-arousing and positive valenced words induced a larger LPP than low-arousing and negative valenced words, respectively, and t he LDT elicited a larger P3b than reading. The experimental manipulation of arousal, valence, and task yielded main effects without any interactions on ERP amplitude in the LPP/P3b time range. The arousal and valence effects partially differed from the task effect in scalp topography; in addition, whereas the late positive component elicited by affective stimuli, defined as LPP, was stimulus-locked, the late positive component elicited by task demand, defined as P3b, was mainly latency-variable. Therefore LPP and P3b manifest different subcomponents.-
dc.languageeng-
dc.relation.ispartofBrain Topography-
dc.subjectPermutation test-
dc.subjectEmotion-
dc.subjectEvent-related potential (ERP)-
dc.subjectLate positive potential (LPP)-
dc.subjectP300-
dc.subjectResidue iteration decomposition (RIDE)-
dc.titleDissociating the Influence of Affective Word Content and Cognitive Processing Demands on the Late Positive Potential-
dc.typeArticle-
dc.description.naturelink_to_subscribed_fulltext-
dc.identifier.doi10.1007/s10548-015-0438-2-
dc.identifier.pmid26012382-
dc.identifier.scopuseid_2-s2.0-84953367093-
dc.identifier.volume29-
dc.identifier.issue1-
dc.identifier.spage82-
dc.identifier.epage93-
dc.identifier.eissn1573-6792-
dc.identifier.isiWOS:000368150700007-
dc.identifier.issnl0896-0267-

Export via OAI-PMH Interface in XML Formats


OR


Export to Other Non-XML Formats