File Download
There are no files associated with this item.
Supplementary
-
Citations:
- Appears in Collections:
Conference Paper: An empirical comparison of two cognitive diagnosis models for polytomous attributes
Title | An empirical comparison of two cognitive diagnosis models for polytomous attributes |
---|---|
Authors | |
Issue Date | 2017 |
Publisher | National Council on Measurement in Education (NCME). |
Citation | The Annual Meeting of National Council on Measurement in Education (NCME): Advancing Large Scale and Classroom Assessment through Research and Practice, San Antonio, TX, 26-30 April 2017 How to Cite? |
Abstract | This paper proposes the fully additive model (fA-M), and compares it with the polytomous generalized deterministic input, noisy 'and' gate (pG-DINA model) using real data. Different statistics indicate that the fA-M provides a better model-data fit than the pG-DINA model . Moreover, the two models produces very disparate examinee classifications. |
Description | Paper Session, M7: Model fit issues with Diagnotic Classification Models |
Persistent Identifier | http://hdl.handle.net/10722/247984 |
DC Field | Value | Language |
---|---|---|
dc.contributor.author | Yakar, L | - |
dc.contributor.author | de la Torre, J | - |
dc.contributor.author | Ma, W | - |
dc.date.accessioned | 2017-10-18T08:35:54Z | - |
dc.date.available | 2017-10-18T08:35:54Z | - |
dc.date.issued | 2017 | - |
dc.identifier.citation | The Annual Meeting of National Council on Measurement in Education (NCME): Advancing Large Scale and Classroom Assessment through Research and Practice, San Antonio, TX, 26-30 April 2017 | - |
dc.identifier.uri | http://hdl.handle.net/10722/247984 | - |
dc.description | Paper Session, M7: Model fit issues with Diagnotic Classification Models | - |
dc.description.abstract | This paper proposes the fully additive model (fA-M), and compares it with the polytomous generalized deterministic input, noisy 'and' gate (pG-DINA model) using real data. Different statistics indicate that the fA-M provides a better model-data fit than the pG-DINA model . Moreover, the two models produces very disparate examinee classifications. | - |
dc.language | eng | - |
dc.publisher | National Council on Measurement in Education (NCME). | - |
dc.relation.ispartof | The Annual Meeting of National Council on Measurement in Education | - |
dc.title | An empirical comparison of two cognitive diagnosis models for polytomous attributes | - |
dc.type | Conference_Paper | - |
dc.identifier.email | de la Torre, J: jdltorre@hku.hk | - |
dc.identifier.authority | de la Torre, J=rp02159 | - |
dc.identifier.hkuros | 279634 | - |
dc.publisher.place | San Antonio, TX | - |