File Download
  Links for fulltext
     (May Require Subscription)
Supplementary

Article: Equalising Schooling, Unequalising Private Supplementary Tutoring: Access and Tracking through Shadow Education in China

TitleEqualising Schooling, Unequalising Private Supplementary Tutoring: Access and Tracking through Shadow Education in China
Authors
KeywordsChina
inequalities
Private supplementary tutoring
shadow education
tracking
Issue Date2018
PublisherRoutledge. The Journal's web site is located at http://www.tandf.co.uk/journals/titles/03054985.asp
Citation
Oxford Review of Education, 2018, v. 44 n. 2, p. 221-238 How to Cite?
AbstractThe global expansion of mass schooling has greatly increased opportunities for low-income families, and governments have devoted much effort to equalising access and quality in education systems. Alongside regular schooling, the so-called shadow education system of private supplementary tutoring has grown rapidly across the world. The fact that rich families can purchase more and better quality shadow education undermines the achievements of increased equality of opportunities in formal schooling. Drawing on a mixed-methods study in Shanghai, China, the article shows how shadow education has offset school equalisation policies through differentiation of access and through sorting mechanisms. Shadow education occupies a space beyond strict government control in which privileged families and elite schools ignore and mediate the equalisation policies, seeking competitive advantages. Uneven access to shadow education and tracking within it shape, maintain and exacerbate inequitable schooling experiences at individual and institutional levels.
Persistent Identifierhttp://hdl.handle.net/10722/248601
ISSN
2023 Impact Factor: 2.3
2023 SCImago Journal Rankings: 0.987
ISI Accession Number ID

 

DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorZhang, W-
dc.contributor.authorBray, TM-
dc.date.accessioned2017-10-18T08:45:42Z-
dc.date.available2017-10-18T08:45:42Z-
dc.date.issued2018-
dc.identifier.citationOxford Review of Education, 2018, v. 44 n. 2, p. 221-238-
dc.identifier.issn0305-4985-
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10722/248601-
dc.description.abstractThe global expansion of mass schooling has greatly increased opportunities for low-income families, and governments have devoted much effort to equalising access and quality in education systems. Alongside regular schooling, the so-called shadow education system of private supplementary tutoring has grown rapidly across the world. The fact that rich families can purchase more and better quality shadow education undermines the achievements of increased equality of opportunities in formal schooling. Drawing on a mixed-methods study in Shanghai, China, the article shows how shadow education has offset school equalisation policies through differentiation of access and through sorting mechanisms. Shadow education occupies a space beyond strict government control in which privileged families and elite schools ignore and mediate the equalisation policies, seeking competitive advantages. Uneven access to shadow education and tracking within it shape, maintain and exacerbate inequitable schooling experiences at individual and institutional levels.-
dc.languageeng-
dc.publisherRoutledge. The Journal's web site is located at http://www.tandf.co.uk/journals/titles/03054985.asp-
dc.relation.ispartofOxford Review of Education-
dc.rightsThis is an Accepted Manuscript of an article published by Taylor & Francis Group in Oxford Review of Education on 20 Dec 2017, available online at: http://www.tandfonline.com/doi/abs/10.1080/03054985.2017.1389710-
dc.subjectChina-
dc.subjectinequalities-
dc.subjectPrivate supplementary tutoring-
dc.subjectshadow education-
dc.subjecttracking-
dc.titleEqualising Schooling, Unequalising Private Supplementary Tutoring: Access and Tracking through Shadow Education in China-
dc.typeArticle-
dc.identifier.emailZhang, W: weizh@hku.hk-
dc.identifier.emailBray, TM: mbray@hkucc.hku.hk-
dc.identifier.authorityBray, TM=rp00888-
dc.description.naturepostprint-
dc.identifier.doi10.1080/03054985.2017.1389710-
dc.identifier.scopuseid_2-s2.0-85038623695-
dc.identifier.hkuros280648-
dc.identifier.volume44-
dc.identifier.issue2-
dc.identifier.spage221-
dc.identifier.epage238-
dc.identifier.isiWOS:000427063900006-
dc.publisher.placeUnited Kingdom-
dc.identifier.issnl0305-4985-

Export via OAI-PMH Interface in XML Formats


OR


Export to Other Non-XML Formats