File Download
  Links for fulltext
     (May Require Subscription)
Supplementary

Article: Efficacy and Tolerability of Aprepitant for the Prevention of Chemotherapy-Induced Nausea and Vomiting in Patients With Breast Cancer After Moderately Emetogenic Chemotherapy

TitleEfficacy and Tolerability of Aprepitant for the Prevention of Chemotherapy-Induced Nausea and Vomiting in Patients With Breast Cancer After Moderately Emetogenic Chemotherapy
Authors
Issue Date2005
PublisherAmerican Society of Clinical Oncology. The Journal's web site is located at http://www.jco.org/
Citation
Journal of Clinical Oncology, 2005, v. 23, p. 2822-2830 How to Cite?
AbstractPURPOSE: This is the first study in which the NK(1)-receptor antagonist, aprepitant (APR), was evaluated for the prevention of chemotherapy-induced nausea and vomiting (CINV) with moderately emetogenic chemotherapy. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Eligible breast cancer patients were naive to emetogenic chemotherapy and treated with cyclophosphamide +/- doxorubicin or epirubicin. Patients were randomly assigned to either an aprepitant regimen (day 1, APR 125 mg, ondansetron (OND) 8 mg, and dexamethasone 12 mg before chemotherapy and OND 8 mg 8 hours later; days 2 through 3, APR 80 qd) [DOSAGE ERROR CORRECTED] or a control regimen (day 1, OND 8 mg and dexamethasone 20 mg before chemotherapy and OND 8 mg 8 hours later; days 2 through 3, OND 8 mg bid). Data on nausea, vomiting, and use of rescue medication were collected with a self-report diary. The primary efficacy end point was the proportion of patients with complete response, defined as no vomiting and no use of rescue therapy, during 120 hours after initiation of chemotherapy in cycle 1. The secondary end point was the proportion of patients with an average item score higher than 6 of 7 on the Functional Living Index-Emesis questionnaire. RESULTS: Of 866 patients randomized, 857 patients (99%) were assessable. Overall complete response was greater with the aprepitant regimen than with the control regimen (50.8% v 42.5%; P = .015). More patients in the aprepitant group reported minimal or no impact of CINV on daily life (63.5% v 55.6%; P = .019). Both treatments were generally well tolerated. CONCLUSION: The aprepitant regimen was more effective than the control regimen for prevention of CINV in patients receiving both an anthracycline and cyclophosphamide.
Persistent Identifierhttp://hdl.handle.net/10722/251816
ISSN
2023 Impact Factor: 42.1
2023 SCImago Journal Rankings: 10.639
ISI Accession Number ID

 

DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorWarr, DG-
dc.contributor.authorHesketh, PJ-
dc.contributor.authorGralla, RJ-
dc.contributor.authorMuss, HB-
dc.contributor.authorHerrstedt, J-
dc.contributor.authorEisenberg, PD-
dc.contributor.authorRaftopoulos, H-
dc.contributor.authorGrunberg, SM-
dc.contributor.authorGabriel, M-
dc.contributor.authorRodgers, A-
dc.contributor.authorBohidar, N-
dc.contributor.authorKlinger, G-
dc.contributor.authorHustad, CM-
dc.contributor.authorHorgan, KJ-
dc.contributor.authorSkobieranda, F-
dc.contributor.authorKwong, A-
dc.date.accessioned2018-03-19T07:01:43Z-
dc.date.available2018-03-19T07:01:43Z-
dc.date.issued2005-
dc.identifier.citationJournal of Clinical Oncology, 2005, v. 23, p. 2822-2830-
dc.identifier.issn0732-183X-
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10722/251816-
dc.description.abstractPURPOSE: This is the first study in which the NK(1)-receptor antagonist, aprepitant (APR), was evaluated for the prevention of chemotherapy-induced nausea and vomiting (CINV) with moderately emetogenic chemotherapy. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Eligible breast cancer patients were naive to emetogenic chemotherapy and treated with cyclophosphamide +/- doxorubicin or epirubicin. Patients were randomly assigned to either an aprepitant regimen (day 1, APR 125 mg, ondansetron (OND) 8 mg, and dexamethasone 12 mg before chemotherapy and OND 8 mg 8 hours later; days 2 through 3, APR 80 qd) [DOSAGE ERROR CORRECTED] or a control regimen (day 1, OND 8 mg and dexamethasone 20 mg before chemotherapy and OND 8 mg 8 hours later; days 2 through 3, OND 8 mg bid). Data on nausea, vomiting, and use of rescue medication were collected with a self-report diary. The primary efficacy end point was the proportion of patients with complete response, defined as no vomiting and no use of rescue therapy, during 120 hours after initiation of chemotherapy in cycle 1. The secondary end point was the proportion of patients with an average item score higher than 6 of 7 on the Functional Living Index-Emesis questionnaire. RESULTS: Of 866 patients randomized, 857 patients (99%) were assessable. Overall complete response was greater with the aprepitant regimen than with the control regimen (50.8% v 42.5%; P = .015). More patients in the aprepitant group reported minimal or no impact of CINV on daily life (63.5% v 55.6%; P = .019). Both treatments were generally well tolerated. CONCLUSION: The aprepitant regimen was more effective than the control regimen for prevention of CINV in patients receiving both an anthracycline and cyclophosphamide.-
dc.languageeng-
dc.publisherAmerican Society of Clinical Oncology. The Journal's web site is located at http://www.jco.org/-
dc.relation.ispartofJournal of Clinical Oncology-
dc.titleEfficacy and Tolerability of Aprepitant for the Prevention of Chemotherapy-Induced Nausea and Vomiting in Patients With Breast Cancer After Moderately Emetogenic Chemotherapy-
dc.typeArticle-
dc.identifier.emailKwong, A: avakwong@hku.hk-
dc.identifier.authorityKwong, A=rp01734-
dc.description.naturepublished_or_final_version-
dc.identifier.doi10.1200/JCO.2005.09.050-
dc.identifier.scopuseid_2-s2.0-21044434743-
dc.identifier.hkuros284571-
dc.identifier.volume23-
dc.identifier.spage2822-
dc.identifier.epage2830-
dc.identifier.isiWOS:000228563600031-
dc.publisher.placeUnited States-
dc.identifier.issnl0732-183X-

Export via OAI-PMH Interface in XML Formats


OR


Export to Other Non-XML Formats