File Download

There are no files associated with this item.

  Links for fulltext
     (May Require Subscription)
Supplementary

Article: Use of co-verbal gestures during word-finding difficulty among Cantonese speakers with fluent aphasia and unimpaired controls

TitleUse of co-verbal gestures during word-finding difficulty among Cantonese speakers with fluent aphasia and unimpaired controls
Authors
KeywordsCantonese
Co-verbal gestures
Discourse
Lexical retrieval
Word-finding difficulty
Issue Date2019
PublisherPsychology Press. The Journal's web site is located at http://www.tandf.co.uk/journals/titles/02687038.asp
Citation
Aphasiology, 2019, v. 33 n. 2, p. 216-233 How to Cite?
AbstractBackground: Co-verbal gestures refer to hand or arm movements made during speaking. Spoken language and gestures have been shown to be tightly integrated in human communication. Aims: The present study investigated whether co-verbal gesture use is associated with lexical retrieval in connected speech in unimpaired speakers and persons with aphasia (PWA). Methods & Procedures: Narrative samples of 58 fluent PWA and 58 control speakers were extracted from Cantonese AphasiaBank. Based on the indicators of word-finding difficulty (WFD) in connected speech adapted from previous research, and a gesture annotation system with independent coding of gesture forms and functions, all WFD instances were then identified. The presence and type of gestures accompanying each incident of WFD were then annotated. Finally, whether the use of gesture was accompanied by resolution of WFD, i.e., the corresponding target word could be retrieved, was examined. Outcomes & Results: Employment of co-verbal gesture did not seem to be related to the success of word retrieval. PWA’s naming ability at single-word level and their overall language ability (as reflected by the aphasia quotient of the Cantonese version of the Western Aphasia Battery) were found to be the two strongest indicators of success rate of resolving WFD. Conclusions: The Lexical Retrieval Hypothesis about the facilitative functions of iconic and metaphoric gestures in lexical retrieval was not supported. Challenges in conducting research related to WFD, and the clinical implications in gesture-based language intervention for PWA are discussed.
Persistent Identifierhttp://hdl.handle.net/10722/258753
ISSN
2021 Impact Factor: 1.902
2020 SCImago Journal Rankings: 0.767
PubMed Central ID
ISI Accession Number ID

 

DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorKong, APH-
dc.contributor.authorLaw, SP-
dc.contributor.authorCheung, CKY-
dc.date.accessioned2018-08-22T01:43:32Z-
dc.date.available2018-08-22T01:43:32Z-
dc.date.issued2019-
dc.identifier.citationAphasiology, 2019, v. 33 n. 2, p. 216-233-
dc.identifier.issn0268-7038-
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10722/258753-
dc.description.abstractBackground: Co-verbal gestures refer to hand or arm movements made during speaking. Spoken language and gestures have been shown to be tightly integrated in human communication. Aims: The present study investigated whether co-verbal gesture use is associated with lexical retrieval in connected speech in unimpaired speakers and persons with aphasia (PWA). Methods & Procedures: Narrative samples of 58 fluent PWA and 58 control speakers were extracted from Cantonese AphasiaBank. Based on the indicators of word-finding difficulty (WFD) in connected speech adapted from previous research, and a gesture annotation system with independent coding of gesture forms and functions, all WFD instances were then identified. The presence and type of gestures accompanying each incident of WFD were then annotated. Finally, whether the use of gesture was accompanied by resolution of WFD, i.e., the corresponding target word could be retrieved, was examined. Outcomes & Results: Employment of co-verbal gesture did not seem to be related to the success of word retrieval. PWA’s naming ability at single-word level and their overall language ability (as reflected by the aphasia quotient of the Cantonese version of the Western Aphasia Battery) were found to be the two strongest indicators of success rate of resolving WFD. Conclusions: The Lexical Retrieval Hypothesis about the facilitative functions of iconic and metaphoric gestures in lexical retrieval was not supported. Challenges in conducting research related to WFD, and the clinical implications in gesture-based language intervention for PWA are discussed.-
dc.languageeng-
dc.publisherPsychology Press. The Journal's web site is located at http://www.tandf.co.uk/journals/titles/02687038.asp-
dc.relation.ispartofAphasiology-
dc.subjectCantonese-
dc.subjectCo-verbal gestures-
dc.subjectDiscourse-
dc.subjectLexical retrieval-
dc.subjectWord-finding difficulty-
dc.titleUse of co-verbal gestures during word-finding difficulty among Cantonese speakers with fluent aphasia and unimpaired controls-
dc.typeArticle-
dc.identifier.emailLaw, SP: splaw@hku.hk-
dc.identifier.authorityLaw, SP=rp00920-
dc.description.naturelink_to_OA_fulltext-
dc.identifier.doi10.1080/02687038.2018.1463085-
dc.identifier.pmid30853744-
dc.identifier.pmcidPMC6402778-
dc.identifier.scopuseid_2-s2.0-85045470440-
dc.identifier.hkuros286629-
dc.identifier.volume33-
dc.identifier.issue2-
dc.identifier.spage216-
dc.identifier.epage233-
dc.identifier.isiWOS:000453029700006-
dc.publisher.placeUnited Kingdom-
dc.identifier.issnl0268-7038-

Export via OAI-PMH Interface in XML Formats


OR


Export to Other Non-XML Formats