File Download
There are no files associated with this item.
Links for fulltext
(May Require Subscription)
- Publisher Website: 10.1007/s00268-018-4786-4
- Scopus: eid_2-s2.0-85054487928
- PMID: 30276441
- WOS: WOS:000455555600001
- Find via
Supplementary
- Citations:
- Appears in Collections:
Article: Guidelines for perioperative care in esophagectomy: Enhanced recovery after surgery (ERAS) Society Recommendations
Title | Guidelines for perioperative care in esophagectomy: Enhanced recovery after surgery (ERAS) Society Recommendations |
---|---|
Authors | |
Issue Date | 2019 |
Publisher | Springer for International Society of Surgery. The Journal's web site is located at http://www.springer.com/medicine/surgery/journal/268 |
Citation | World Journal of Surgery, 2019, v. 43 n. 2, p. 299-330 How to Cite? |
Abstract | Introduction
Enhanced recovery after surgery (ERAS) programs provide a format for multidisciplinary care and has been shown to predictably improve short term outcomes associated with surgical procedures. Esophagectomy has historically been associated with significant levels of morbidity and mortality and as a result routine application and audit of ERAS guidelines specifically designed for esophageal resection has significant potential to improve outcomes associated with this complex procedure.
Methods
A team of international experts in the surgical management of esophageal cancer was assembled and the existing literature was identified and reviewed prior to the production of the guidelines. Well established procedure specific components of ERAS were reviewed and updated with changes relevant to esophagectomy. Procedure specific, operative and technical sections were produced utilizing the best current level of evidence. All sections were rated regarding the level of evidence and overall recommendation according to the evaluation (GRADE) system.
Results
Thirty-nine sections were ultimately produced and assessed for quality of evidence and recommendations. Some sections were completely new to ERAS programs due to the fact that esophagectomy is the first guideline with a thoracic component to the procedure.
Conclusions
The current ERAS society guidelines should be reviewed and applied in all centers looking to improve outcomes and quality associated with esophageal resection. |
Persistent Identifier | http://hdl.handle.net/10722/273432 |
ISSN | 2023 Impact Factor: 2.3 2023 SCImago Journal Rankings: 0.772 |
ISI Accession Number ID |
DC Field | Value | Language |
---|---|---|
dc.contributor.author | Low, DE | - |
dc.contributor.author | Allum, W | - |
dc.contributor.author | De Manzoni, G | - |
dc.contributor.author | Ferri, L | - |
dc.contributor.author | Immanuel, A | - |
dc.contributor.author | Kuppusamy, M | - |
dc.contributor.author | Law, SYK | - |
dc.contributor.author | Lindblad, M | - |
dc.contributor.author | Maynard, N | - |
dc.contributor.author | Neal, J | - |
dc.contributor.author | Pramesh, CS | - |
dc.contributor.author | Scott, M | - |
dc.contributor.author | Mark Smithers, B | - |
dc.contributor.author | Addor, V | - |
dc.contributor.author | Ljunggvist, O | - |
dc.date.accessioned | 2019-08-06T09:28:51Z | - |
dc.date.available | 2019-08-06T09:28:51Z | - |
dc.date.issued | 2019 | - |
dc.identifier.citation | World Journal of Surgery, 2019, v. 43 n. 2, p. 299-330 | - |
dc.identifier.issn | 0364-2313 | - |
dc.identifier.uri | http://hdl.handle.net/10722/273432 | - |
dc.description.abstract | Introduction Enhanced recovery after surgery (ERAS) programs provide a format for multidisciplinary care and has been shown to predictably improve short term outcomes associated with surgical procedures. Esophagectomy has historically been associated with significant levels of morbidity and mortality and as a result routine application and audit of ERAS guidelines specifically designed for esophageal resection has significant potential to improve outcomes associated with this complex procedure. Methods A team of international experts in the surgical management of esophageal cancer was assembled and the existing literature was identified and reviewed prior to the production of the guidelines. Well established procedure specific components of ERAS were reviewed and updated with changes relevant to esophagectomy. Procedure specific, operative and technical sections were produced utilizing the best current level of evidence. All sections were rated regarding the level of evidence and overall recommendation according to the evaluation (GRADE) system. Results Thirty-nine sections were ultimately produced and assessed for quality of evidence and recommendations. Some sections were completely new to ERAS programs due to the fact that esophagectomy is the first guideline with a thoracic component to the procedure. Conclusions The current ERAS society guidelines should be reviewed and applied in all centers looking to improve outcomes and quality associated with esophageal resection. | - |
dc.language | eng | - |
dc.publisher | Springer for International Society of Surgery. The Journal's web site is located at http://www.springer.com/medicine/surgery/journal/268 | - |
dc.relation.ispartof | World Journal of Surgery | - |
dc.title | Guidelines for perioperative care in esophagectomy: Enhanced recovery after surgery (ERAS) Society Recommendations | - |
dc.type | Article | - |
dc.identifier.email | Law, SYK: slaw@hku.hk | - |
dc.identifier.authority | Law, SYK=rp00437 | - |
dc.description.nature | link_to_subscribed_fulltext | - |
dc.identifier.doi | 10.1007/s00268-018-4786-4 | - |
dc.identifier.pmid | 30276441 | - |
dc.identifier.scopus | eid_2-s2.0-85054487928 | - |
dc.identifier.hkuros | 300890 | - |
dc.identifier.volume | 43 | - |
dc.identifier.issue | 2 | - |
dc.identifier.spage | 299 | - |
dc.identifier.epage | 330 | - |
dc.identifier.isi | WOS:000455555600001 | - |
dc.publisher.place | United States | - |
dc.identifier.issnl | 0364-2313 | - |