File Download

There are no files associated with this item.

  Links for fulltext
     (May Require Subscription)
Supplementary

Article: Guidelines for perioperative care in esophagectomy: Enhanced recovery after surgery (ERAS) Society Recommendations

TitleGuidelines for perioperative care in esophagectomy: Enhanced recovery after surgery (ERAS) Society Recommendations
Authors
Issue Date2019
PublisherSpringer for International Society of Surgery. The Journal's web site is located at http://www.springer.com/medicine/surgery/journal/268
Citation
World Journal of Surgery, 2019, v. 43 n. 2, p. 299-330 How to Cite?
AbstractIntroduction Enhanced recovery after surgery (ERAS) programs provide a format for multidisciplinary care and has been shown to predictably improve short term outcomes associated with surgical procedures. Esophagectomy has historically been associated with significant levels of morbidity and mortality and as a result routine application and audit of ERAS guidelines specifically designed for esophageal resection has significant potential to improve outcomes associated with this complex procedure. Methods A team of international experts in the surgical management of esophageal cancer was assembled and the existing literature was identified and reviewed prior to the production of the guidelines. Well established procedure specific components of ERAS were reviewed and updated with changes relevant to esophagectomy. Procedure specific, operative and technical sections were produced utilizing the best current level of evidence. All sections were rated regarding the level of evidence and overall recommendation according to the evaluation (GRADE) system. Results Thirty-nine sections were ultimately produced and assessed for quality of evidence and recommendations. Some sections were completely new to ERAS programs due to the fact that esophagectomy is the first guideline with a thoracic component to the procedure. Conclusions The current ERAS society guidelines should be reviewed and applied in all centers looking to improve outcomes and quality associated with esophageal resection.
Persistent Identifierhttp://hdl.handle.net/10722/273432
ISSN
2019 Impact Factor: 2.234
2015 SCImago Journal Rankings: 1.375
ISI Accession Number ID

 

DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorLow, DE-
dc.contributor.authorAllum, W-
dc.contributor.authorDe Manzoni, G-
dc.contributor.authorFerri, L-
dc.contributor.authorImmanuel, A-
dc.contributor.authorKuppusamy, M-
dc.contributor.authorLaw, SYK-
dc.contributor.authorLindblad, M-
dc.contributor.authorMaynard, N-
dc.contributor.authorNeal, J-
dc.contributor.authorPramesh, CS-
dc.contributor.authorScott, M-
dc.contributor.authorMark Smithers, B-
dc.contributor.authorAddor, V-
dc.contributor.authorLjunggvist, O-
dc.date.accessioned2019-08-06T09:28:51Z-
dc.date.available2019-08-06T09:28:51Z-
dc.date.issued2019-
dc.identifier.citationWorld Journal of Surgery, 2019, v. 43 n. 2, p. 299-330-
dc.identifier.issn0364-2313-
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10722/273432-
dc.description.abstractIntroduction Enhanced recovery after surgery (ERAS) programs provide a format for multidisciplinary care and has been shown to predictably improve short term outcomes associated with surgical procedures. Esophagectomy has historically been associated with significant levels of morbidity and mortality and as a result routine application and audit of ERAS guidelines specifically designed for esophageal resection has significant potential to improve outcomes associated with this complex procedure. Methods A team of international experts in the surgical management of esophageal cancer was assembled and the existing literature was identified and reviewed prior to the production of the guidelines. Well established procedure specific components of ERAS were reviewed and updated with changes relevant to esophagectomy. Procedure specific, operative and technical sections were produced utilizing the best current level of evidence. All sections were rated regarding the level of evidence and overall recommendation according to the evaluation (GRADE) system. Results Thirty-nine sections were ultimately produced and assessed for quality of evidence and recommendations. Some sections were completely new to ERAS programs due to the fact that esophagectomy is the first guideline with a thoracic component to the procedure. Conclusions The current ERAS society guidelines should be reviewed and applied in all centers looking to improve outcomes and quality associated with esophageal resection.-
dc.languageeng-
dc.publisherSpringer for International Society of Surgery. The Journal's web site is located at http://www.springer.com/medicine/surgery/journal/268-
dc.relation.ispartofWorld Journal of Surgery-
dc.titleGuidelines for perioperative care in esophagectomy: Enhanced recovery after surgery (ERAS) Society Recommendations-
dc.typeArticle-
dc.identifier.emailLaw, SYK: slaw@hku.hk-
dc.identifier.authorityLaw, SYK=rp00437-
dc.description.naturelink_to_subscribed_fulltext-
dc.identifier.doi10.1007/s00268-018-4786-4-
dc.identifier.pmid30276441-
dc.identifier.scopuseid_2-s2.0-85054487928-
dc.identifier.hkuros300890-
dc.identifier.volume43-
dc.identifier.issue2-
dc.identifier.spage299-
dc.identifier.epage330-
dc.identifier.isiWOS:000455555600001-
dc.publisher.placeUnited States-
dc.identifier.issnl0364-2313-

Export via OAI-PMH Interface in XML Formats


OR


Export to Other Non-XML Formats