File Download
There are no files associated with this item.
Links for fulltext
(May Require Subscription)
- Publisher Website: 10.1016/j.ijepes.2019.03.061
- Scopus: eid_2-s2.0-85064464210
- WOS: WOS:000470943700032
- Find via
Supplementary
- Citations:
- Appears in Collections:
Article: Applicability comparison of different algorithms for ambient signal based load model parameter identification
Title | Applicability comparison of different algorithms for ambient signal based load model parameter identification |
---|---|
Authors | |
Keywords | Ambient signal based load model parameter identification Active-set algorithm Differential evolution algorithm Grid search algorithm Interior-point algorithm |
Issue Date | 2019 |
Publisher | Elsevier Ltd. The Journal's web site is located at http://www.elsevier.com/locate/ijepes |
Citation | International Journal of Electrical Power & Energy Systems, 2019, v. 111, p. 382-389 How to Cite? |
Abstract | The time-varying characteristic of the power load can be tracked with the ambient signal based load model parameter identification method proposed recently. Meanwhile, the small fluctuations of the ambient signal bring higher requirement for optimization algorithm as well. The interior-point algorithm (IPA) and the activeset algorithm (ASA) are two typical traditional nonlinear constrained optimization algorithms, while the differential evolution algorithm (DEA) is an excellent heuristic search algorithm. Besides, the grid search algorithm (GSA) is a violent search algorithm, which is also an effective method considering the fact that the real load model parameters are unknown in practical power system. Based on the review of the basic idea of the four algorithms, the applicability of the four algorithms is comparatively assessed for ambient signal based load model parameter identification. Their performance is compared using ambient data from both simulation and field phasor measurement unit (PMU) in China Southern Power Grid considering the identification accuracy, calculation time, and the robustness to measurement error and algorithm parameters. Some general conclusions are drawn from the analysis for several cases. |
Persistent Identifier | http://hdl.handle.net/10722/273870 |
ISSN | 2023 Impact Factor: 5.0 2023 SCImago Journal Rankings: 1.711 |
ISI Accession Number ID |
DC Field | Value | Language |
---|---|---|
dc.contributor.author | Wang, Y | - |
dc.contributor.author | Lu, C | - |
dc.contributor.author | Zhang, X | - |
dc.date.accessioned | 2019-08-18T14:50:17Z | - |
dc.date.available | 2019-08-18T14:50:17Z | - |
dc.date.issued | 2019 | - |
dc.identifier.citation | International Journal of Electrical Power & Energy Systems, 2019, v. 111, p. 382-389 | - |
dc.identifier.issn | 0142-0615 | - |
dc.identifier.uri | http://hdl.handle.net/10722/273870 | - |
dc.description.abstract | The time-varying characteristic of the power load can be tracked with the ambient signal based load model parameter identification method proposed recently. Meanwhile, the small fluctuations of the ambient signal bring higher requirement for optimization algorithm as well. The interior-point algorithm (IPA) and the activeset algorithm (ASA) are two typical traditional nonlinear constrained optimization algorithms, while the differential evolution algorithm (DEA) is an excellent heuristic search algorithm. Besides, the grid search algorithm (GSA) is a violent search algorithm, which is also an effective method considering the fact that the real load model parameters are unknown in practical power system. Based on the review of the basic idea of the four algorithms, the applicability of the four algorithms is comparatively assessed for ambient signal based load model parameter identification. Their performance is compared using ambient data from both simulation and field phasor measurement unit (PMU) in China Southern Power Grid considering the identification accuracy, calculation time, and the robustness to measurement error and algorithm parameters. Some general conclusions are drawn from the analysis for several cases. | - |
dc.language | eng | - |
dc.publisher | Elsevier Ltd. The Journal's web site is located at http://www.elsevier.com/locate/ijepes | - |
dc.relation.ispartof | International Journal of Electrical Power & Energy Systems | - |
dc.subject | Ambient signal based load model parameter identification | - |
dc.subject | Active-set algorithm | - |
dc.subject | Differential evolution algorithm | - |
dc.subject | Grid search algorithm | - |
dc.subject | Interior-point algorithm | - |
dc.title | Applicability comparison of different algorithms for ambient signal based load model parameter identification | - |
dc.type | Article | - |
dc.identifier.email | Zhang, X: zhangxr7@hku.hk | - |
dc.description.nature | link_to_subscribed_fulltext | - |
dc.identifier.doi | 10.1016/j.ijepes.2019.03.061 | - |
dc.identifier.scopus | eid_2-s2.0-85064464210 | - |
dc.identifier.hkuros | 302018 | - |
dc.identifier.volume | 111 | - |
dc.identifier.spage | 382 | - |
dc.identifier.epage | 389 | - |
dc.identifier.isi | WOS:000470943700032 | - |
dc.publisher.place | United Kingdom | - |
dc.identifier.issnl | 0142-0615 | - |