File Download

There are no files associated with this item.

  Links for fulltext
     (May Require Subscription)
Supplementary

Article: Current and future challenges of the Chinese research system

TitleCurrent and future challenges of the Chinese research system
Authors
KeywordsChina
research system
academic research
knowledge
publications
Issue Date2020
PublisherRoutledge. The Journal's web site is located at http://www.tandf.co.uk/journals/titles/1360080X.asp
Citation
Journal of Higher Education Policy and Management, 2020, v. 42 n. 2, p. 157-177 How to Cite?
AbstractThis paper assesses the evolution and current situation of the Chinese research system, mainly the academic research system from 1996 to 2017, using trend analysis and the revealed comparative advantage (RCA) index. Despite the impressive growth of China’s knowledge capability, as measured by the number of publications in the international indexed literature over the past four decades, the country is still in a catching-up pattern with the world’s most advanced research systems, instead of being a full-fledged scientific superpower. The analysis shows that China’s publication growth has been to some extent inflated, as it was boosted by the inclusion of Chinese language journals in the international indexed literature. Therefore, this growth should be considered in a more moderate light. The competitiveness of China’s disciplinary areas appears somewhat stalled when comparing the 1996–2000 and 2013–2017 periods, during which the same STEM-related disciplinary areas were the most competitive. This finding reveals not only a specialised knowledge structure, typical of catching-up countries, but also underperforming and neglected disciplinary areas in the social sciences, humanities and health sciences from a research funding standpoint. Based on this assessment, it is recommended that policymakers and university administrators change their focus from research quantity to research visibility by allocating funding in a less concentrated way to STEM fields, while promoting collaborative initiatives that can encourage the qualifications of academics and the visibility of the knowledge they produce.
Persistent Identifierhttp://hdl.handle.net/10722/274612
ISSN
2021 Impact Factor: 2.553
2020 SCImago Journal Rankings: 0.934
ISI Accession Number ID

 

DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorHorta, H-
dc.contributor.authorShen, W-
dc.date.accessioned2019-08-18T15:05:18Z-
dc.date.available2019-08-18T15:05:18Z-
dc.date.issued2020-
dc.identifier.citationJournal of Higher Education Policy and Management, 2020, v. 42 n. 2, p. 157-177-
dc.identifier.issn1360-080X-
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10722/274612-
dc.description.abstractThis paper assesses the evolution and current situation of the Chinese research system, mainly the academic research system from 1996 to 2017, using trend analysis and the revealed comparative advantage (RCA) index. Despite the impressive growth of China’s knowledge capability, as measured by the number of publications in the international indexed literature over the past four decades, the country is still in a catching-up pattern with the world’s most advanced research systems, instead of being a full-fledged scientific superpower. The analysis shows that China’s publication growth has been to some extent inflated, as it was boosted by the inclusion of Chinese language journals in the international indexed literature. Therefore, this growth should be considered in a more moderate light. The competitiveness of China’s disciplinary areas appears somewhat stalled when comparing the 1996–2000 and 2013–2017 periods, during which the same STEM-related disciplinary areas were the most competitive. This finding reveals not only a specialised knowledge structure, typical of catching-up countries, but also underperforming and neglected disciplinary areas in the social sciences, humanities and health sciences from a research funding standpoint. Based on this assessment, it is recommended that policymakers and university administrators change their focus from research quantity to research visibility by allocating funding in a less concentrated way to STEM fields, while promoting collaborative initiatives that can encourage the qualifications of academics and the visibility of the knowledge they produce.-
dc.languageeng-
dc.publisherRoutledge. The Journal's web site is located at http://www.tandf.co.uk/journals/titles/1360080X.asp-
dc.relation.ispartofJournal of Higher Education Policy and Management-
dc.rightsPreprint: This is an Author's Original Manuscript of an article published by Taylor & Francis Group in [JOURNAL TITLE] on [date of publication], available online: http://www.tandfonline.com/doi/abs/[Article DOI]. Postprint: This is an Accepted Manuscript of an article published by Taylor & Francis Group in [JOURNAL TITLE] on [date of publication], available online at: http://www.tandfonline.com/doi/abs/[Article DOI].-
dc.subjectChina-
dc.subjectresearch system-
dc.subjectacademic research-
dc.subjectknowledge-
dc.subjectpublications-
dc.titleCurrent and future challenges of the Chinese research system-
dc.typeArticle-
dc.identifier.emailHorta, H: horta@hku.hk-
dc.identifier.authorityHorta, H=rp01959-
dc.description.naturelink_to_subscribed_fulltext-
dc.identifier.doi10.1080/1360080X.2019.1632162-
dc.identifier.scopuseid_2-s2.0-85067701851-
dc.identifier.hkuros302132-
dc.identifier.volume42-
dc.identifier.issue2-
dc.identifier.spage157-
dc.identifier.epage177-
dc.identifier.isiWOS:000473148200001-
dc.publisher.placeUnited Kingdom-
dc.identifier.issnl1360-080X-

Export via OAI-PMH Interface in XML Formats


OR


Export to Other Non-XML Formats