File Download
There are no files associated with this item.
Supplementary
-
Citations:
- Appears in Collections:
Conference Paper: Production vs. perception in implicit learning of phonological alternations
Title | Production vs. perception in implicit learning of phonological alternations |
---|---|
Authors | |
Issue Date | 2020 |
Publisher | Linguistic Society of America. |
Citation | The 94th Annual Meeting of the Linguistic Society of America, New Orleans, LA , USA, 2-5 January 2020 How to Cite? |
Abstract | Although phonological naturalness is typically defined in terms of both perceptual and articulatory ease, most artifical language studies train participants on either heard or spoken items but not both. We directly compare production- and perception-based learning of phonological alternations and show that experience with production facilitates learning, regardless of the language's naturalness or variability. We discuss the role of production in understanding phonological learning bias; we argue that the limited evidence for bias against articulatory difficult patterns supports the notion that phonetically natural patterns arise as a result of listener-driven channel bias rather than speaker-driven biases. |
Description | Plenary Poster Session |
Persistent Identifier | http://hdl.handle.net/10722/274767 |
DC Field | Value | Language |
---|---|---|
dc.contributor.author | Do, Y | - |
dc.contributor.author | Havenhill, JE | - |
dc.contributor.author | Sevilla, RM | - |
dc.date.accessioned | 2019-09-10T02:28:16Z | - |
dc.date.available | 2019-09-10T02:28:16Z | - |
dc.date.issued | 2020 | - |
dc.identifier.citation | The 94th Annual Meeting of the Linguistic Society of America, New Orleans, LA , USA, 2-5 January 2020 | - |
dc.identifier.uri | http://hdl.handle.net/10722/274767 | - |
dc.description | Plenary Poster Session | - |
dc.description.abstract | Although phonological naturalness is typically defined in terms of both perceptual and articulatory ease, most artifical language studies train participants on either heard or spoken items but not both. We directly compare production- and perception-based learning of phonological alternations and show that experience with production facilitates learning, regardless of the language's naturalness or variability. We discuss the role of production in understanding phonological learning bias; we argue that the limited evidence for bias against articulatory difficult patterns supports the notion that phonetically natural patterns arise as a result of listener-driven channel bias rather than speaker-driven biases. | - |
dc.language | eng | - |
dc.publisher | Linguistic Society of America. | - |
dc.relation.ispartof | 94th Annual Meeting of the Linguistic Society of America | - |
dc.title | Production vs. perception in implicit learning of phonological alternations | - |
dc.type | Conference_Paper | - |
dc.identifier.email | Do, Y: youngah@hku.hk | - |
dc.identifier.email | Havenhill, JE: jhavenhill@hku.hk | - |
dc.identifier.authority | Do, Y=rp02160 | - |
dc.identifier.authority | Havenhill, JE=rp02445 | - |
dc.identifier.hkuros | 304716 | - |
dc.publisher.place | New Orleans, LA , USA | - |