File Download

There are no files associated with this item.

Supplementary

Conference Paper: Kowtowing Sinophile? Sir Percy Cradock and the Future of Hong Kong

TitleKowtowing Sinophile? Sir Percy Cradock and the Future of Hong Kong
Authors
Issue Date2019
PublisherDepartment of History, The University of Hong Kong.
Citation
11th Spring History Symposium, Hong Kong, 2-3 May 2019 How to Cite?
AbstractMy paper is about Sir Percy Cradock, former British Ambassador to China, first chief British negotiator, and keen critic of British policy after his retirement. I use the newly available Percy Cradock papers at Cambridge to reveal personal dimensions and show how his China-based training did not fully prepare him to anticipate challenges in Hong Kong. I also show that his personal desire for a legacy meant that he lashed out publicly at the colonial administration during his retirement. I conclude that his sinologist training was in fact a hindrance when dealing with people of Hong Kong, linking high diplomacy to the social impact. I also draw out points regarding the use of memoirs, personal papers and other sources in addition to official archival material.
DescriptionPlenary Session 1: Hong Kong
Persistent Identifierhttp://hdl.handle.net/10722/279058

 

DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorLi, MY-
dc.date.accessioned2019-10-21T02:18:54Z-
dc.date.available2019-10-21T02:18:54Z-
dc.date.issued2019-
dc.identifier.citation11th Spring History Symposium, Hong Kong, 2-3 May 2019-
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10722/279058-
dc.descriptionPlenary Session 1: Hong Kong-
dc.description.abstractMy paper is about Sir Percy Cradock, former British Ambassador to China, first chief British negotiator, and keen critic of British policy after his retirement. I use the newly available Percy Cradock papers at Cambridge to reveal personal dimensions and show how his China-based training did not fully prepare him to anticipate challenges in Hong Kong. I also show that his personal desire for a legacy meant that he lashed out publicly at the colonial administration during his retirement. I conclude that his sinologist training was in fact a hindrance when dealing with people of Hong Kong, linking high diplomacy to the social impact. I also draw out points regarding the use of memoirs, personal papers and other sources in addition to official archival material.-
dc.languageeng-
dc.publisherDepartment of History, The University of Hong Kong. -
dc.relation.ispartofSpring History Symposium-
dc.titleKowtowing Sinophile? Sir Percy Cradock and the Future of Hong Kong-
dc.typeConference_Paper-
dc.identifier.hkuros307443-
dc.publisher.placeHong Kong-

Export via OAI-PMH Interface in XML Formats


OR


Export to Other Non-XML Formats