File Download
  Links for fulltext
     (May Require Subscription)
Supplementary

Article: The role of metacognition and its indirect effect through cognitive attentional syndrome on fear of cancer recurrence trajectories: a longitudinal study

TitleThe role of metacognition and its indirect effect through cognitive attentional syndrome on fear of cancer recurrence trajectories: a longitudinal study
Authors
Keywordsattentional bias
avoidance
fear of cancer recurrence trajectory
intrusive thoughts
Issue Date2020
PublisherJohn Wiley & Sons Ltd. The Journal's web site is located at http://www3.interscience.wiley.com/cgi-bin/jhome/5807
Citation
Psycho-Oncology, 2020, v. 29 n. 2, p. 271-279 How to Cite?
AbstractObjective: This longitudinal study mapped distinct trajectories of fear of cancer recurrence (FCR) over 12 months among patients with breast (BC) or colorectal (CRC) cancer, and examined if metacognition, indirectly via attentional bias, intrusive thoughts and avoidance (hallmarks of cognitive attentional syndrome; CAS) predicted FCR trajectory membership. Methods: Two hundred and seventy BC (n = 163) or CRC (n = 107) patients were assessed at 8‐weeks, 3‐, 6‐, and 12‐months postsurgery on a measure of FCR (FCRI‐SF). Metacognition (MCQ‐30), Intrusive and Avoidant Thoughts (CIES‐R) and attentional bias (dot‐probe tasks) were assessed at baseline. Latent growth mixture modeling identified FCR trajectories. Fully‐adjusted Multinomial Logistic Regression identified whether direct and indirect effects of metacognition through CAS determined FCR trajectory membership. Results: Three distinct FCR trajectories were identified, namely, low‐stable (62.4%), high‐stable (29.2%), and recovery (8.3%). Negative beliefs about worry, cognitive confidence, and age predicted FCR trajectories (χ2 (6) = 38.31, P<.001). Compared with Low‐stable group, Recovery FCR patients held greater Negative beliefs about worry (OR = 1.13, P = .035) and High‐stable FCR patients reported poorer Cognitive confidence (OR = 1.12, P = .004). The effect of Negative beliefs about worry was partially mediated by avoidance (β = .06, 95% CIs 0.03‐0.12) and fully mediated by intrusive thoughts (β = .14, 95% CIs 0.08‐0.20). Attentional bias did not predict FCR trajectories. Conclusions: While most patients experienced low level of FCR, 3 in 10 persistently worried about cancer returning over the first 12‐months postsurgery. Modifying metacognitive knowledge to interrupt maladaptive cognitive processing including intrusion and avoidance may be an effective therapeutic intervention for patients at risk of persistent FCR.
Persistent Identifierhttp://hdl.handle.net/10722/280233
ISSN
2023 Impact Factor: 3.3
2023 SCImago Journal Rankings: 1.136
ISI Accession Number ID

 

DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorNg, DWL-
dc.contributor.authorFoo, CC-
dc.contributor.authorNg, SSM-
dc.contributor.authorKwong, A-
dc.contributor.authorSuen, D-
dc.contributor.authorChan, M-
dc.contributor.authorOr, A-
dc.contributor.authorChun, OK-
dc.contributor.authorFielding, BFS-
dc.contributor.authorLam, WWT-
dc.date.accessioned2020-01-21T11:50:34Z-
dc.date.available2020-01-21T11:50:34Z-
dc.date.issued2020-
dc.identifier.citationPsycho-Oncology, 2020, v. 29 n. 2, p. 271-279-
dc.identifier.issn1057-9249-
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10722/280233-
dc.description.abstractObjective: This longitudinal study mapped distinct trajectories of fear of cancer recurrence (FCR) over 12 months among patients with breast (BC) or colorectal (CRC) cancer, and examined if metacognition, indirectly via attentional bias, intrusive thoughts and avoidance (hallmarks of cognitive attentional syndrome; CAS) predicted FCR trajectory membership. Methods: Two hundred and seventy BC (n = 163) or CRC (n = 107) patients were assessed at 8‐weeks, 3‐, 6‐, and 12‐months postsurgery on a measure of FCR (FCRI‐SF). Metacognition (MCQ‐30), Intrusive and Avoidant Thoughts (CIES‐R) and attentional bias (dot‐probe tasks) were assessed at baseline. Latent growth mixture modeling identified FCR trajectories. Fully‐adjusted Multinomial Logistic Regression identified whether direct and indirect effects of metacognition through CAS determined FCR trajectory membership. Results: Three distinct FCR trajectories were identified, namely, low‐stable (62.4%), high‐stable (29.2%), and recovery (8.3%). Negative beliefs about worry, cognitive confidence, and age predicted FCR trajectories (χ2 (6) = 38.31, P<.001). Compared with Low‐stable group, Recovery FCR patients held greater Negative beliefs about worry (OR = 1.13, P = .035) and High‐stable FCR patients reported poorer Cognitive confidence (OR = 1.12, P = .004). The effect of Negative beliefs about worry was partially mediated by avoidance (β = .06, 95% CIs 0.03‐0.12) and fully mediated by intrusive thoughts (β = .14, 95% CIs 0.08‐0.20). Attentional bias did not predict FCR trajectories. Conclusions: While most patients experienced low level of FCR, 3 in 10 persistently worried about cancer returning over the first 12‐months postsurgery. Modifying metacognitive knowledge to interrupt maladaptive cognitive processing including intrusion and avoidance may be an effective therapeutic intervention for patients at risk of persistent FCR.-
dc.languageeng-
dc.publisherJohn Wiley & Sons Ltd. The Journal's web site is located at http://www3.interscience.wiley.com/cgi-bin/jhome/5807-
dc.relation.ispartofPsycho-Oncology-
dc.rightsThis is the peer reviewed version of the following article: Psycho-Oncology, 2020, v. 29 n. 2, p. 271-279, which has been published in final form at https://doi.org/10.1002/pon.5234. This article may be used for non-commercial purposes in accordance with Wiley Terms and Conditions for Use of Self-Archived Versions.-
dc.subjectattentional bias-
dc.subjectavoidance-
dc.subjectfear of cancer recurrence trajectory-
dc.subjectintrusive thoughts-
dc.titleThe role of metacognition and its indirect effect through cognitive attentional syndrome on fear of cancer recurrence trajectories: a longitudinal study-
dc.typeArticle-
dc.identifier.emailNg, DWL: dwlng@HKUCC-COM.hku.hk-
dc.identifier.emailFoo, CC: ccfoo@hku.hk-
dc.identifier.emailKwong, A: avakwong@hku.hk-
dc.identifier.emailSuen, D: suentkd@hku.hk-
dc.identifier.emailLam, WWT: wwtlam@hku.hk-
dc.identifier.authorityFoo, CC=rp01899-
dc.identifier.authorityKwong, A=rp01734-
dc.identifier.authorityLam, WWT=rp00443-
dc.description.naturepostprint-
dc.identifier.doi10.1002/pon.5234-
dc.identifier.pmid31663187-
dc.identifier.scopuseid_2-s2.0-85077154646-
dc.identifier.hkuros308964-
dc.identifier.volume29-
dc.identifier.issue2-
dc.identifier.spage271-
dc.identifier.epage279-
dc.identifier.isiWOS:000503923200001-
dc.publisher.placeUnited Kingdom-
dc.identifier.issnl1057-9249-

Export via OAI-PMH Interface in XML Formats


OR


Export to Other Non-XML Formats