File Download

There are no files associated with this item.

  Links for fulltext
     (May Require Subscription)
Supplementary

Article: MRF-ZOOM for the unbalanced steady-state free precession (ubSSFP) magnetic resonance fingerprinting

TitleMRF-ZOOM for the unbalanced steady-state free precession (ubSSFP) magnetic resonance fingerprinting
Authors
KeywordsMagnetic resonance fingerprinting
Fast searching
ubSSFP
FISP
T1
Issue Date2020
PublisherElsevier Inc. The Journal's web site is located at http://www.elsevier.com/locate/mri
Citation
Magnetic Resonance Imaging, 2020, v. 65, p. 146-154 How to Cite?
AbstractIn magnetic resonance fingerprinting (MRF), tissue parameters are determined by finding the best-match to the acquired MR signal from a predefined signal dictionary. This dictionary searching (DS) process is generally performed in an exhaustive manner, which requires a large predefined dictionary and long searching time. A fast MRF DS algorithm, MRF-ZOOM, was recently proposed based on DS objective function optimization. As a proof-of-concept study, MRF-ZOOM was only tested with one of the earliest MRF sequences but not with the recently more popular unbalanced steady state free precession MRF sequence (MRF-ubSSFP, or MRF-FISP). Meanwhile noise effects on MRF and MRF-ZOOM have not been examined. The purpose of this study was to address these open questions and to verify whether MRF-ZOOM can be combined with a dictionary-compression based method to gain further speed. Numerical simulations were performed to evaluate the DS objective function properties, noise effects on MRF, and to compare MRF-ZOOM with other methods in terms of speed and accuracy. In-vivo experiments were performed as well. Evaluation results showed that premises of MRF-ZOOM held for MRF-FISP; noise did not affect MRF-ZOOM more than the conventional MRF method; when SNR ≥ 1, MRF quantification yielded accurate results. Dictionary compression introduced quantification errors more to T2 quantification. MRF-ZOOM was thousands of times faster than the conventional MRF method. Combining MRF-ZOOM with dictionary compression showed no benefit in terms of fitting speed. In conclusion, MRF-ZOOM is valid for MRF- FISP, and can remarkably save MRF dictionary generation and searching time without sacrificing matching accuracy.
Persistent Identifierhttp://hdl.handle.net/10722/280270
ISSN
2021 Impact Factor: 3.130
2020 SCImago Journal Rankings: 0.723
PubMed Central ID
ISI Accession Number ID

 

DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorWang, Z-
dc.contributor.authorCui, D-
dc.contributor.authorZhang, J-
dc.contributor.authorWu, EX-
dc.contributor.authorHui, ES-
dc.date.accessioned2020-01-21T11:51:00Z-
dc.date.available2020-01-21T11:51:00Z-
dc.date.issued2020-
dc.identifier.citationMagnetic Resonance Imaging, 2020, v. 65, p. 146-154-
dc.identifier.issn0730-725X-
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10722/280270-
dc.description.abstractIn magnetic resonance fingerprinting (MRF), tissue parameters are determined by finding the best-match to the acquired MR signal from a predefined signal dictionary. This dictionary searching (DS) process is generally performed in an exhaustive manner, which requires a large predefined dictionary and long searching time. A fast MRF DS algorithm, MRF-ZOOM, was recently proposed based on DS objective function optimization. As a proof-of-concept study, MRF-ZOOM was only tested with one of the earliest MRF sequences but not with the recently more popular unbalanced steady state free precession MRF sequence (MRF-ubSSFP, or MRF-FISP). Meanwhile noise effects on MRF and MRF-ZOOM have not been examined. The purpose of this study was to address these open questions and to verify whether MRF-ZOOM can be combined with a dictionary-compression based method to gain further speed. Numerical simulations were performed to evaluate the DS objective function properties, noise effects on MRF, and to compare MRF-ZOOM with other methods in terms of speed and accuracy. In-vivo experiments were performed as well. Evaluation results showed that premises of MRF-ZOOM held for MRF-FISP; noise did not affect MRF-ZOOM more than the conventional MRF method; when SNR ≥ 1, MRF quantification yielded accurate results. Dictionary compression introduced quantification errors more to T2 quantification. MRF-ZOOM was thousands of times faster than the conventional MRF method. Combining MRF-ZOOM with dictionary compression showed no benefit in terms of fitting speed. In conclusion, MRF-ZOOM is valid for MRF- FISP, and can remarkably save MRF dictionary generation and searching time without sacrificing matching accuracy.-
dc.languageeng-
dc.publisherElsevier Inc. The Journal's web site is located at http://www.elsevier.com/locate/mri-
dc.relation.ispartofMagnetic Resonance Imaging-
dc.subjectMagnetic resonance fingerprinting-
dc.subjectFast searching-
dc.subjectubSSFP-
dc.subjectFISP-
dc.subjectT1-
dc.titleMRF-ZOOM for the unbalanced steady-state free precession (ubSSFP) magnetic resonance fingerprinting-
dc.typeArticle-
dc.identifier.emailCui, D: cuidi00@hku.hk-
dc.identifier.emailWu, EX: ewu@eee.hku.hk-
dc.identifier.emailHui, ES: edshui@hku.hk-
dc.identifier.authorityWu, EX=rp00193-
dc.identifier.authorityHui, ES=rp01832-
dc.description.naturelink_to_OA_fulltext-
dc.identifier.doi10.1016/j.mri.2019.11.010-
dc.identifier.pmid31726211-
dc.identifier.pmcidPMC6907731-
dc.identifier.scopuseid_2-s2.0-85074796160-
dc.identifier.hkuros308990-
dc.identifier.hkuros311195-
dc.identifier.volume65-
dc.identifier.spage146-
dc.identifier.epage154-
dc.identifier.isiWOS:000504801100018-
dc.publisher.placeUnited States-
dc.identifier.issnl0730-725X-

Export via OAI-PMH Interface in XML Formats


OR


Export to Other Non-XML Formats