File Download
There are no files associated with this item.
Links for fulltext
(May Require Subscription)
- Publisher Website: 10.1016/j.ijcard.2019.09.071
- Scopus: eid_2-s2.0-85075495372
- PMID: 31748182
- WOS: WOS:000506884700014
- Find via
Supplementary
- Citations:
- Appears in Collections:
Article: Early and mid-term mortality and morbidity of contemporary international endovascular treatment for type B aortic dissection - A systematic review and meta-analysis
Title | Early and mid-term mortality and morbidity of contemporary international endovascular treatment for type B aortic dissection - A systematic review and meta-analysis |
---|---|
Authors | |
Keywords | Aortic dissection Meta-analysis Morbidity Mortality Thoracic endovascular aortic repair |
Issue Date | 2020 |
Publisher | Elsevier Ireland Ltd. The Journal's web site is located at http://www.elsevier.com/locate/ijcard |
Citation | International Journal of Cardiology, 2020, v. 301, p. 56-61 How to Cite? |
Abstract | BACKGROUND:
Effectiveness and optimal timing of endovascular treatment for type B aortic dissection (AD) remain controversial.
METHOD:
An extensive search of literature (January 1999-December 2017) was conducted using PubMed, Cochrane Library and Science-Direct databases for studies on endovascular repair for acute/chronic type B AD; ≥10 patients; not reviews; and reporting predefined baseline data and ≥50% of predefined study outcomes, which were extracted and analysed according to Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic reviews and Meta-Analyses. Primary outcomes were in-hospital all-cause mortality and aorta-related mortality.
RESULT:
Based on 92 publications (5956 patients), pooled estimate for overall in-hospital mortality was 7.0% [95% CI, 6.2%-7.8%]. Major perioperative complications included stroke (4.2% [3.6%-4.9%]), spinal cord ischemia (3.3% [2.8%-3.9%]), retrograde type A AD (3.2% [2.7%-3.9%]), type I endoleak (4.9% [3.8%-6.2%]), visceral ischemia (3.1% [2.5%-3.8%]) and acute renal failure requiring haemodialysis (5.1% [4.3%-5.9%]). Mid-term mortality incidence was 8.9% [7.2%-10.9%], and secondary intervention rate was 12.5% [10.5%-15.0%] with 6.1% [5.3%-7.2%] conversion to open surgery. Institutions with ≥40 endovascular treatment caseload had significantly lower rates of in-hospital and aorta-related mortality, stroke, type I endoleak, renal failure and retrograde type A AD. Patients treated in the acute phase had significantly higher incidence of in-hospital or aorta-related mortality and renal failure. Patients with chronic dissection required significantly more often secondary intervention during follow-up.
CONCLUSION:
Endovascular stent-graft for type B AD therefore appeared feasible and safe with a low incidence of mortality and perioperative complications, particularly for delayed intervention and centres with ≥40 caseload. Standardized and long-term follow-up data are warranted.
Copyright © 2019 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved. |
Persistent Identifier | http://hdl.handle.net/10722/281810 |
ISSN | 2023 Impact Factor: 3.2 2023 SCImago Journal Rankings: 1.126 |
ISI Accession Number ID |
DC Field | Value | Language |
---|---|---|
dc.contributor.author | Li, H-L | - |
dc.contributor.author | Wu, S | - |
dc.contributor.author | Chan, YC | - |
dc.contributor.author | Cheng, SW | - |
dc.contributor.author | Xiong, J | - |
dc.date.accessioned | 2020-03-27T04:22:48Z | - |
dc.date.available | 2020-03-27T04:22:48Z | - |
dc.date.issued | 2020 | - |
dc.identifier.citation | International Journal of Cardiology, 2020, v. 301, p. 56-61 | - |
dc.identifier.issn | 0167-5273 | - |
dc.identifier.uri | http://hdl.handle.net/10722/281810 | - |
dc.description.abstract | BACKGROUND: Effectiveness and optimal timing of endovascular treatment for type B aortic dissection (AD) remain controversial. METHOD: An extensive search of literature (January 1999-December 2017) was conducted using PubMed, Cochrane Library and Science-Direct databases for studies on endovascular repair for acute/chronic type B AD; ≥10 patients; not reviews; and reporting predefined baseline data and ≥50% of predefined study outcomes, which were extracted and analysed according to Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic reviews and Meta-Analyses. Primary outcomes were in-hospital all-cause mortality and aorta-related mortality. RESULT: Based on 92 publications (5956 patients), pooled estimate for overall in-hospital mortality was 7.0% [95% CI, 6.2%-7.8%]. Major perioperative complications included stroke (4.2% [3.6%-4.9%]), spinal cord ischemia (3.3% [2.8%-3.9%]), retrograde type A AD (3.2% [2.7%-3.9%]), type I endoleak (4.9% [3.8%-6.2%]), visceral ischemia (3.1% [2.5%-3.8%]) and acute renal failure requiring haemodialysis (5.1% [4.3%-5.9%]). Mid-term mortality incidence was 8.9% [7.2%-10.9%], and secondary intervention rate was 12.5% [10.5%-15.0%] with 6.1% [5.3%-7.2%] conversion to open surgery. Institutions with ≥40 endovascular treatment caseload had significantly lower rates of in-hospital and aorta-related mortality, stroke, type I endoleak, renal failure and retrograde type A AD. Patients treated in the acute phase had significantly higher incidence of in-hospital or aorta-related mortality and renal failure. Patients with chronic dissection required significantly more often secondary intervention during follow-up. CONCLUSION: Endovascular stent-graft for type B AD therefore appeared feasible and safe with a low incidence of mortality and perioperative complications, particularly for delayed intervention and centres with ≥40 caseload. Standardized and long-term follow-up data are warranted. Copyright © 2019 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved. | - |
dc.language | eng | - |
dc.publisher | Elsevier Ireland Ltd. The Journal's web site is located at http://www.elsevier.com/locate/ijcard | - |
dc.relation.ispartof | International Journal of Cardiology | - |
dc.subject | Aortic dissection | - |
dc.subject | Meta-analysis | - |
dc.subject | Morbidity | - |
dc.subject | Mortality | - |
dc.subject | Thoracic endovascular aortic repair | - |
dc.title | Early and mid-term mortality and morbidity of contemporary international endovascular treatment for type B aortic dissection - A systematic review and meta-analysis | - |
dc.type | Article | - |
dc.identifier.email | Chan, YC: ycchan88@hkucc.hku.hk | - |
dc.identifier.email | Cheng, SW: swkcheng@hku.hk | - |
dc.identifier.authority | Chan, YC=rp00530 | - |
dc.identifier.authority | Cheng, SW=rp00374 | - |
dc.description.nature | link_to_subscribed_fulltext | - |
dc.identifier.doi | 10.1016/j.ijcard.2019.09.071 | - |
dc.identifier.pmid | 31748182 | - |
dc.identifier.scopus | eid_2-s2.0-85075495372 | - |
dc.identifier.hkuros | 309551 | - |
dc.identifier.volume | 301 | - |
dc.identifier.spage | 56 | - |
dc.identifier.epage | 61 | - |
dc.identifier.isi | WOS:000506884700014 | - |
dc.publisher.place | Ireland | - |
dc.identifier.issnl | 0167-5273 | - |