File Download
There are no files associated with this item.
Links for fulltext
(May Require Subscription)
- Publisher Website: 10.1002/tal.1752
- Scopus: eid_2-s2.0-85085652706
- WOS: WOS:000535644400001
- Find via
Supplementary
- Citations:
- Appears in Collections:
Article: Simplified seismic axial collapse capacity prediction model for moderately compressed reinforced concrete shear walls adjacent to transfer structure in tall buildings
Title | Simplified seismic axial collapse capacity prediction model for moderately compressed reinforced concrete shear walls adjacent to transfer structure in tall buildings |
---|---|
Authors | |
Keywords | Mohr's stress circle out‐of‐plane buckling failure RC shear walls seismic axial collapse shear failure |
Issue Date | 2020 |
Publisher | John Wiley & Sons Ltd. The Journal's web site is located at http://www.interscience.wiley.com/jpages/1541-7794/ |
Citation | The Structural Design of Tall and Special Buildings, 2020, v. 29 n. 12, p. article no. e1752 How to Cite? |
Abstract | Nonseismically detailed reinforced concrete (RC) shear walls adjacent to transfer structure in tall buildings are found to have short shear spans and designed to hold considerable axial load. In a previous paper, a Modified Mohr's Axial Capacity Model was developed by the authors to estimate the axial collapse of these RC walls in seismic events, which is expressed as an axial load ratio devised based on classical Mohr's circle framework. It was noted that the previous model can be complicated and appears not suitable for direct adoption in engineering design check. Hence, in this paper, a new simplified seismic axial collapse capacity prediction model is formulated to improvise the previous model. This simplified model typifies the practical range of shear wall geometry, concrete strength, steel reinforcement stress and strain and reinforcement ratio. Simplified charts to estimate maximum shear stress are presented for quicker design check. The complex inelastic buckling stress calculation is simplified into graphs and design equations. A knife-edge feasible solutions zone is defined, expressed as an inequality function of axial-to-shear capacity ratio and additional axial stress induced by lateral shear. Recommendations are made based on results obtained from Genetic Algorithm search and further justified by parametric studies. |
Persistent Identifier | http://hdl.handle.net/10722/284481 |
ISSN | 2021 Impact Factor: 2.760 2020 SCImago Journal Rankings: 0.895 |
ISI Accession Number ID |
DC Field | Value | Language |
---|---|---|
dc.contributor.author | SHAN, Z | - |
dc.contributor.author | Looi, DTW | - |
dc.contributor.author | Cheng, BEI | - |
dc.contributor.author | Su, RKL | - |
dc.date.accessioned | 2020-08-07T08:58:15Z | - |
dc.date.available | 2020-08-07T08:58:15Z | - |
dc.date.issued | 2020 | - |
dc.identifier.citation | The Structural Design of Tall and Special Buildings, 2020, v. 29 n. 12, p. article no. e1752 | - |
dc.identifier.issn | 1541-7794 | - |
dc.identifier.uri | http://hdl.handle.net/10722/284481 | - |
dc.description.abstract | Nonseismically detailed reinforced concrete (RC) shear walls adjacent to transfer structure in tall buildings are found to have short shear spans and designed to hold considerable axial load. In a previous paper, a Modified Mohr's Axial Capacity Model was developed by the authors to estimate the axial collapse of these RC walls in seismic events, which is expressed as an axial load ratio devised based on classical Mohr's circle framework. It was noted that the previous model can be complicated and appears not suitable for direct adoption in engineering design check. Hence, in this paper, a new simplified seismic axial collapse capacity prediction model is formulated to improvise the previous model. This simplified model typifies the practical range of shear wall geometry, concrete strength, steel reinforcement stress and strain and reinforcement ratio. Simplified charts to estimate maximum shear stress are presented for quicker design check. The complex inelastic buckling stress calculation is simplified into graphs and design equations. A knife-edge feasible solutions zone is defined, expressed as an inequality function of axial-to-shear capacity ratio and additional axial stress induced by lateral shear. Recommendations are made based on results obtained from Genetic Algorithm search and further justified by parametric studies. | - |
dc.language | eng | - |
dc.publisher | John Wiley & Sons Ltd. The Journal's web site is located at http://www.interscience.wiley.com/jpages/1541-7794/ | - |
dc.relation.ispartof | The Structural Design of Tall and Special Buildings | - |
dc.rights | Preprint This is the pre-peer reviewed version of the following article: [FULL CITE], which has been published in final form at [Link to final article using the DOI]. This article may be used for non-commercial purposes in accordance with Wiley Terms and Conditions for Use of Self-Archived Versions. Postprint This is the peer reviewed version of the following article: [FULL CITE], which has been published in final form at [Link to final article using the DOI]. This article may be used for non-commercial purposes in accordance with Wiley Terms and Conditions for Use of Self-Archived Versions. | - |
dc.subject | Mohr's stress circle | - |
dc.subject | out‐of‐plane buckling failure | - |
dc.subject | RC shear walls | - |
dc.subject | seismic axial collapse | - |
dc.subject | shear failure | - |
dc.title | Simplified seismic axial collapse capacity prediction model for moderately compressed reinforced concrete shear walls adjacent to transfer structure in tall buildings | - |
dc.type | Article | - |
dc.identifier.email | Su, RKL: klsu@hkucc.hku.hk | - |
dc.identifier.authority | Su, RKL=rp00072 | - |
dc.description.nature | link_to_subscribed_fulltext | - |
dc.identifier.doi | 10.1002/tal.1752 | - |
dc.identifier.scopus | eid_2-s2.0-85085652706 | - |
dc.identifier.hkuros | 311917 | - |
dc.identifier.volume | 29 | - |
dc.identifier.issue | 12 | - |
dc.identifier.spage | article no. e1752 | - |
dc.identifier.epage | article no. e1752 | - |
dc.identifier.isi | WOS:000535644400001 | - |
dc.publisher.place | United Kingdom | - |
dc.identifier.issnl | 1541-7794 | - |