File Download
Links for fulltext
(May Require Subscription)
- Publisher Website: 10.3389/fpsyg.2020.02257
- Scopus: eid_2-s2.0-85090765041
- PMID: 32973640
- WOS: WOS:000570678000001
- Find via
Supplementary
- Citations:
- Appears in Collections:
Article: Different patterns of relationships between principal leadership and 15-year-old students’ science learning: How school resources, teacher quality, and school socioeconomic status make a difference
Title | Different patterns of relationships between principal leadership and 15-year-old students’ science learning: How school resources, teacher quality, and school socioeconomic status make a difference |
---|---|
Authors | |
Keywords | Academic achievement Learning enjoyment PISA Principals School context School leadership |
Issue Date | 2020 |
Publisher | Frontiers Research Foundation. The Journal's web site is located at http://www.frontiersin.org/psychology |
Citation | Frontiers in Psychology, 2020, v. 11, article no. 2257 How to Cite? |
Abstract | The present study critically evaluates whether school leadership influences student learning homogenously regardless of school contexts. It examined relationships between four principal leadership variables (envisioning, instructional management, promoting professional development, empowerment) and two types of student outcomes (enjoyment in learning science, science achievement,) in different school contexts (in terms of the availability of science resources, quality of science teachers, and school socioeconomic status (SES)). The sample comprised 248,620 students and 9,370 principals in 35 developed countries who participated in the Programme for International Student Assessment (PISA) 2015. Latent profile analysis (LPA) showed that schools operated in three types of school contexts with different levels of science resources, proportion of quality science teachers, and school SES. There were also differences in the pattern of leadership practices across the three types of school contexts. Three-level hierarchical linear modeling (HLM) showed that among the four leadership variables, only instructional management was positively associated with students’ enjoyment of science in schools with less science resources and quality science teachers. Therefore, instructional management had compensatory effects for students in less-endowed schools. In contrast, principal leadership related to envisioning, teacher professional development, and empowerment was not positively related to students’ science learning in all three school contexts. |
Persistent Identifier | http://hdl.handle.net/10722/285333 |
ISSN | 2023 Impact Factor: 2.6 2023 SCImago Journal Rankings: 0.800 |
PubMed Central ID | |
ISI Accession Number ID |
DC Field | Value | Language |
---|---|---|
dc.contributor.author | Tan, CY | - |
dc.contributor.author | Liu, P | - |
dc.contributor.author | Wong, WLV | - |
dc.date.accessioned | 2020-08-18T03:52:30Z | - |
dc.date.available | 2020-08-18T03:52:30Z | - |
dc.date.issued | 2020 | - |
dc.identifier.citation | Frontiers in Psychology, 2020, v. 11, article no. 2257 | - |
dc.identifier.issn | 1664-1078 | - |
dc.identifier.uri | http://hdl.handle.net/10722/285333 | - |
dc.description.abstract | The present study critically evaluates whether school leadership influences student learning homogenously regardless of school contexts. It examined relationships between four principal leadership variables (envisioning, instructional management, promoting professional development, empowerment) and two types of student outcomes (enjoyment in learning science, science achievement,) in different school contexts (in terms of the availability of science resources, quality of science teachers, and school socioeconomic status (SES)). The sample comprised 248,620 students and 9,370 principals in 35 developed countries who participated in the Programme for International Student Assessment (PISA) 2015. Latent profile analysis (LPA) showed that schools operated in three types of school contexts with different levels of science resources, proportion of quality science teachers, and school SES. There were also differences in the pattern of leadership practices across the three types of school contexts. Three-level hierarchical linear modeling (HLM) showed that among the four leadership variables, only instructional management was positively associated with students’ enjoyment of science in schools with less science resources and quality science teachers. Therefore, instructional management had compensatory effects for students in less-endowed schools. In contrast, principal leadership related to envisioning, teacher professional development, and empowerment was not positively related to students’ science learning in all three school contexts. | - |
dc.language | eng | - |
dc.publisher | Frontiers Research Foundation. The Journal's web site is located at http://www.frontiersin.org/psychology | - |
dc.relation.ispartof | Frontiers in Psychology | - |
dc.rights | This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License. | - |
dc.subject | Academic achievement | - |
dc.subject | Learning enjoyment | - |
dc.subject | PISA | - |
dc.subject | Principals | - |
dc.subject | School context | - |
dc.subject | School leadership | - |
dc.title | Different patterns of relationships between principal leadership and 15-year-old students’ science learning: How school resources, teacher quality, and school socioeconomic status make a difference | - |
dc.type | Article | - |
dc.identifier.email | Tan, CY: tancy@hku.hk | - |
dc.identifier.email | Wong, WLV: wongvin@hku.hk | - |
dc.identifier.authority | Tan, CY=rp01826 | - |
dc.description.nature | published_or_final_version | - |
dc.identifier.doi | 10.3389/fpsyg.2020.02257 | - |
dc.identifier.pmid | 32973640 | - |
dc.identifier.pmcid | PMC7481831 | - |
dc.identifier.scopus | eid_2-s2.0-85090765041 | - |
dc.identifier.hkuros | 312992 | - |
dc.identifier.hkuros | 315036 | - |
dc.identifier.volume | 11 | - |
dc.identifier.spage | article no. 2257 | - |
dc.identifier.epage | article no. 2257 | - |
dc.identifier.isi | WOS:000570678000001 | - |
dc.publisher.place | Switzerland | - |
dc.identifier.issnl | 1664-1078 | - |