File Download

There are no files associated with this item.

  Links for fulltext
     (May Require Subscription)
Supplementary

Article: Characterising pre-service secondary science teachers’ noticing of different forms of evidence of student thinking

TitleCharacterising pre-service secondary science teachers’ noticing of different forms of evidence of student thinking
Authors
KeywordsTeacher noticing
pre-service teachers
videos
Issue Date2020
PublisherRoutledge. The Journal's web site is located at http://www.tandf.co.uk/journals/titles/09500693.asp
Citation
International Journal of Science Education, 2020, v. 42 n. 4, p. 576-597 How to Cite?
AbstractEvidence of student thinking takes a variety of forms (e.g. verbal responses, gestures) and has varying degrees of visibility within classroom interactions. The purpose of this study was to characterise the nature of pre-service science teachers’ (PSTs’) noticing skills of different forms of evidence of student thinking using video-based interviews. In the interviews, the PSTs were asked to describe what they had noticed in the videos that captured different forms of evidence of student thinking and ‘think on their feet’ to propose the next instructional moves as if they were the teacher. The PSTs’ comments on the videos were analysed qualitatively with respect to the forms of evidence they noticed and how they interpreted and responded to the evidence. Several findings regarding the nature of PSTs’ noticing skills were uncovered. First, the PSTs readily identified non-verbal forms of evidence, such as voting and student actions. However, some forms of evidence that potentially reveal the content of student thought, such as student artefacts, questions and verbal explanations, were less visible to the PSTs. Second, the PSTs used the identified evidence to infer student engagement levels, attributes and understanding and were generally able to propose instructional responses based on the student thinking that they had identified. Third, the findings also suggest that when the PSTs paid attention to the details of the evidence, they were more likely to connect their instructional decisions to student understanding at a content-specific level. The implications for research on PSTs’ noticing and initial education are discussed.
Persistent Identifierhttp://hdl.handle.net/10722/286384
ISSN
2023 Impact Factor: 2.2
2023 SCImago Journal Rankings: 0.965
ISI Accession Number ID

 

DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorLam, DSH-
dc.contributor.authorChan, KKH-
dc.date.accessioned2020-08-31T07:03:05Z-
dc.date.available2020-08-31T07:03:05Z-
dc.date.issued2020-
dc.identifier.citationInternational Journal of Science Education, 2020, v. 42 n. 4, p. 576-597-
dc.identifier.issn0950-0693-
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10722/286384-
dc.description.abstractEvidence of student thinking takes a variety of forms (e.g. verbal responses, gestures) and has varying degrees of visibility within classroom interactions. The purpose of this study was to characterise the nature of pre-service science teachers’ (PSTs’) noticing skills of different forms of evidence of student thinking using video-based interviews. In the interviews, the PSTs were asked to describe what they had noticed in the videos that captured different forms of evidence of student thinking and ‘think on their feet’ to propose the next instructional moves as if they were the teacher. The PSTs’ comments on the videos were analysed qualitatively with respect to the forms of evidence they noticed and how they interpreted and responded to the evidence. Several findings regarding the nature of PSTs’ noticing skills were uncovered. First, the PSTs readily identified non-verbal forms of evidence, such as voting and student actions. However, some forms of evidence that potentially reveal the content of student thought, such as student artefacts, questions and verbal explanations, were less visible to the PSTs. Second, the PSTs used the identified evidence to infer student engagement levels, attributes and understanding and were generally able to propose instructional responses based on the student thinking that they had identified. Third, the findings also suggest that when the PSTs paid attention to the details of the evidence, they were more likely to connect their instructional decisions to student understanding at a content-specific level. The implications for research on PSTs’ noticing and initial education are discussed.-
dc.languageeng-
dc.publisherRoutledge. The Journal's web site is located at http://www.tandf.co.uk/journals/titles/09500693.asp-
dc.relation.ispartofInternational Journal of Science Education-
dc.rightsPreprint: This is an Author's Original Manuscript of an article published by Taylor & Francis Group in [JOURNAL TITLE] on [date of publication], available online: http://www.tandfonline.com/doi/abs/[Article DOI]. Postprint: This is an Accepted Manuscript of an article published by Taylor & Francis Group in [JOURNAL TITLE] on [date of publication], available online at: http://www.tandfonline.com/doi/abs/[Article DOI].-
dc.subjectTeacher noticing-
dc.subjectpre-service teachers-
dc.subjectvideos-
dc.titleCharacterising pre-service secondary science teachers’ noticing of different forms of evidence of student thinking-
dc.typeArticle-
dc.identifier.emailChan, KKH: ckhhku@hku.hk-
dc.identifier.authorityChan, KKH=rp02094-
dc.description.naturelink_to_subscribed_fulltext-
dc.identifier.doi10.1080/09500693.2020.1717672-
dc.identifier.scopuseid_2-s2.0-85078859010-
dc.identifier.hkuros313630-
dc.identifier.volume42-
dc.identifier.issue4-
dc.identifier.spage576-
dc.identifier.epage597-
dc.identifier.isiWOS:000511799900001-
dc.publisher.placeUnited Kingdom-
dc.identifier.issnl0950-0693-

Export via OAI-PMH Interface in XML Formats


OR


Export to Other Non-XML Formats