File Download
  Links for fulltext
     (May Require Subscription)
Supplementary

Article: Ranking on Arbitrary Graphs: Rematch via Continuous Linear Programming

TitleRanking on Arbitrary Graphs: Rematch via Continuous Linear Programming
Authors
Keywordsoblivious matching problem
continuous linear programming
ranking algorithm
Issue Date2018
PublisherSociety for Industrial and Applied Mathematics. The Journal's web site is located at http://epubs.siam.org/sam-bin/dbq/toclist/SICOMP
Citation
SIAM Journal on Computing, 2018, v. 47 n. 4, p. 1529-1546 How to Cite?
AbstractMotivated by online advertisement and exchange settings, greedy randomized algorithms for the maximum matching problem have been studied, in which the algorithm makes (random) decisions that are essentially oblivious to the input graph. Any greedy algorithm can achieve a performance ratio of 0.5, which is the expected number of matched nodes to the number of nodes in a maximum matching. Since Aronson, Dyer, Frieze, and Suen [Random Structures Algorithm, 6 (1991), pp. 29--46] proved that the modified randomized greedy algorithm achieves a performance ratio of $0.5 + epsilon$ (where $epsilon = frac{1}{400000}$) on arbitrary graphs in the midnineties, no further attempts in the literature have been made to improve this theoretical ratio for arbitrary graphs until two papers were published in FOCS 2012 [G. Goel and P. Tripathi, IEEE Computer Society, Los Alamitos, CA, 2012, pp. 718--727; M. Poloczek and M. Szegedy, IEEE Computer Society, Los Alamitos, CA, 2012, pp. 708--717]. In this paper, we revisit the ranking algorithm using the linear programming framework. Special care is given to analyze the structural properties of the ranking algorithm in order to derive the linear programming constraints, of which one known as the boundary constraint requires totally new analysis and is crucial to the success of our linear program (LP). We use continuous linear programming relaxation to analyze the limiting behavior as the finite LP grows. Of particular interest are new duality and complementary slackness characterizations that can handle the monotone and the boundary constraints in continuous linear programming. Improving previous work, this paper achieves a theoretical performance ratio of $frac{2(5-sqrt{7})}{9} approx 0.523$ on arbitrary graphs. Read More: https://epubs.siam.org/doi/10.1137/140984051
Persistent Identifierhttp://hdl.handle.net/10722/290735
ISSN
2021 Impact Factor: 1.475
2020 SCImago Journal Rankings: 1.533
ISI Accession Number ID

 

DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorChan, THH-
dc.contributor.authorCHEN, F-
dc.contributor.authorWU, X-
dc.contributor.authorZHAO, Z-
dc.date.accessioned2020-11-02T05:46:22Z-
dc.date.available2020-11-02T05:46:22Z-
dc.date.issued2018-
dc.identifier.citationSIAM Journal on Computing, 2018, v. 47 n. 4, p. 1529-1546-
dc.identifier.issn0097-5397-
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10722/290735-
dc.description.abstractMotivated by online advertisement and exchange settings, greedy randomized algorithms for the maximum matching problem have been studied, in which the algorithm makes (random) decisions that are essentially oblivious to the input graph. Any greedy algorithm can achieve a performance ratio of 0.5, which is the expected number of matched nodes to the number of nodes in a maximum matching. Since Aronson, Dyer, Frieze, and Suen [Random Structures Algorithm, 6 (1991), pp. 29--46] proved that the modified randomized greedy algorithm achieves a performance ratio of $0.5 + epsilon$ (where $epsilon = frac{1}{400000}$) on arbitrary graphs in the midnineties, no further attempts in the literature have been made to improve this theoretical ratio for arbitrary graphs until two papers were published in FOCS 2012 [G. Goel and P. Tripathi, IEEE Computer Society, Los Alamitos, CA, 2012, pp. 718--727; M. Poloczek and M. Szegedy, IEEE Computer Society, Los Alamitos, CA, 2012, pp. 708--717]. In this paper, we revisit the ranking algorithm using the linear programming framework. Special care is given to analyze the structural properties of the ranking algorithm in order to derive the linear programming constraints, of which one known as the boundary constraint requires totally new analysis and is crucial to the success of our linear program (LP). We use continuous linear programming relaxation to analyze the limiting behavior as the finite LP grows. Of particular interest are new duality and complementary slackness characterizations that can handle the monotone and the boundary constraints in continuous linear programming. Improving previous work, this paper achieves a theoretical performance ratio of $frac{2(5-sqrt{7})}{9} approx 0.523$ on arbitrary graphs. Read More: https://epubs.siam.org/doi/10.1137/140984051-
dc.languageeng-
dc.publisherSociety for Industrial and Applied Mathematics. The Journal's web site is located at http://epubs.siam.org/sam-bin/dbq/toclist/SICOMP-
dc.relation.ispartofSIAM Journal on Computing-
dc.rights© [2018] Society for Industrial and Applied Mathematics. First Published in [SIAM Journal on Computing] in [v. 47 n. 4], published by the Society for Industrial and Applied Mathematics (SIAM).-
dc.rightsThis work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.-
dc.subjectoblivious matching problem-
dc.subjectcontinuous linear programming-
dc.subjectranking algorithm-
dc.titleRanking on Arbitrary Graphs: Rematch via Continuous Linear Programming-
dc.typeArticle-
dc.identifier.emailChan, THH: hubert@cs.hku.hk-
dc.identifier.authorityChan, THH=rp01312-
dc.description.naturepublished_or_final_version-
dc.identifier.doi10.1137/140984051-
dc.identifier.scopuseid_2-s2.0-85053598931-
dc.identifier.hkuros318362-
dc.identifier.volume47-
dc.identifier.issue4-
dc.identifier.spage1529-
dc.identifier.epage1546-
dc.identifier.isiWOS:000443195600009-
dc.publisher.placeUnited States-
dc.identifier.issnl0097-5397-

Export via OAI-PMH Interface in XML Formats


OR


Export to Other Non-XML Formats