File Download

There are no files associated with this item.

  Links for fulltext
     (May Require Subscription)
Supplementary

Conference Paper: Radiotherapy and implant-based breast reconstruction: a review of outcomes

TitleRadiotherapy and implant-based breast reconstruction: a review of outcomes
Authors
Issue Date2020
PublisherWiley-Blackwell Publishing Asia. The Journal's web site is located at http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/journal/10.1111/(ISSN)1744-1633
Citation
The Royal College of Surgeons of Edinburgh and The College of Surgeons of Hong Kong (RCSEd/CSHK) Conjoint Virtual Scientific Congress 2020: Towards Personalised Surgery, Hong Kong, 19 September 2020. In Surgical Practice, 2020, v. 24 n. suppl. 1, p. 28, abstract no. P19 How to Cite?
AbstractIntroduction: Implant‐based breast reconstruction is a popular method for reconstruction after mastectomy for breast cancer. However, published data on outcomes of radiation and implant based breast reconstructions is conflicting. This study aims to examine the associated complications related to prosthetic reconstruction in the setting of irradiation to the chest wall. Methods: This is a single‐centre retrospective study analysing data from January first, 2008 to December 31st, 2017 for implant‐based breast reconstruction procedures post‐mastectomy. Procedures included implant placement and latissimus dorsi (LD) flap with implant. The 30‐day complication and re‐operative complication rates were calculated. Associated risk factors were identified. Results: There was a total of 47 prosthetic based breast reconstructions, 19 received irradiation and 28 did not receive irradiation. All patients received an immediate breast reconstruction after mastectomy and all were single staged. The overall complication rate was comparable between the two groups, at 21.1% and 21.4%, P = .975, respectively for the irradiated and non‐irradiated group. The rate for major complications were also similar between the two groups, 10.5% and 7.1%, P = .683. The rate of severe capsular contracture (Baker's III and IV) between the irradiated and non‐irradiated patients was similar, 5.3% and 7.1%, P = .796. Conclusions: This review suggests that radiotherapy in prosthetic based breast reconstruction is feasible and safe. Failure rates in both groups are not clinically and statistically significant, thus questions the role of expander insertion and a two‐stage operation in the setting of radiotherapy. Implant insertion remains a valid choice for these patients and is an alternative to autologous flaps.
DescriptionPoster Presentation - no. P19
Persistent Identifierhttp://hdl.handle.net/10722/297257
ISSN
2023 Impact Factor: 0.3
2023 SCImago Journal Rankings: 0.152

 

DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorMak, JCK-
dc.contributor.authorKwong, A-
dc.date.accessioned2021-03-08T07:16:24Z-
dc.date.available2021-03-08T07:16:24Z-
dc.date.issued2020-
dc.identifier.citationThe Royal College of Surgeons of Edinburgh and The College of Surgeons of Hong Kong (RCSEd/CSHK) Conjoint Virtual Scientific Congress 2020: Towards Personalised Surgery, Hong Kong, 19 September 2020. In Surgical Practice, 2020, v. 24 n. suppl. 1, p. 28, abstract no. P19-
dc.identifier.issn1744-1625-
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10722/297257-
dc.descriptionPoster Presentation - no. P19-
dc.description.abstractIntroduction: Implant‐based breast reconstruction is a popular method for reconstruction after mastectomy for breast cancer. However, published data on outcomes of radiation and implant based breast reconstructions is conflicting. This study aims to examine the associated complications related to prosthetic reconstruction in the setting of irradiation to the chest wall. Methods: This is a single‐centre retrospective study analysing data from January first, 2008 to December 31st, 2017 for implant‐based breast reconstruction procedures post‐mastectomy. Procedures included implant placement and latissimus dorsi (LD) flap with implant. The 30‐day complication and re‐operative complication rates were calculated. Associated risk factors were identified. Results: There was a total of 47 prosthetic based breast reconstructions, 19 received irradiation and 28 did not receive irradiation. All patients received an immediate breast reconstruction after mastectomy and all were single staged. The overall complication rate was comparable between the two groups, at 21.1% and 21.4%, P = .975, respectively for the irradiated and non‐irradiated group. The rate for major complications were also similar between the two groups, 10.5% and 7.1%, P = .683. The rate of severe capsular contracture (Baker's III and IV) between the irradiated and non‐irradiated patients was similar, 5.3% and 7.1%, P = .796. Conclusions: This review suggests that radiotherapy in prosthetic based breast reconstruction is feasible and safe. Failure rates in both groups are not clinically and statistically significant, thus questions the role of expander insertion and a two‐stage operation in the setting of radiotherapy. Implant insertion remains a valid choice for these patients and is an alternative to autologous flaps.-
dc.languageeng-
dc.publisherWiley-Blackwell Publishing Asia. The Journal's web site is located at http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/journal/10.1111/(ISSN)1744-1633-
dc.relation.ispartofSurgical Practice-
dc.relation.ispartofRCSEd/CSHK Conjoint Virtual Scientific Congress 2020-
dc.titleRadiotherapy and implant-based breast reconstruction: a review of outcomes-
dc.typeConference_Paper-
dc.identifier.emailKwong, A: avakwong@hku.hk-
dc.identifier.authorityKwong, A=rp01734-
dc.description.natureabstract-
dc.identifier.hkuros321651-
dc.identifier.volume24-
dc.identifier.issuesuppl. 1-
dc.identifier.spage28, abstract no. P19-
dc.identifier.epage28, abstract no. P19-
dc.publisher.placeAustralia-
dc.identifier.partofdoi10.1111/1744-1633.12450-
dc.identifier.issnl1744-1625-

Export via OAI-PMH Interface in XML Formats


OR


Export to Other Non-XML Formats