File Download

There are no files associated with this item.

  Links for fulltext
     (May Require Subscription)
Supplementary

Article: The Singapore Global Schoolhouse: An analysis of the development of the tertiary education landscape in Singapore

TitleThe Singapore Global Schoolhouse: An analysis of the development of the tertiary education landscape in Singapore
Authors
KeywordsHigher education
Market economy
Centralized control
Singapore
Issue Date2010
Citation
International Journal of Educational Management, 2010, v. 24, n. 3, p. 178-188 How to Cite?
AbstractPurpose – This paper seeks to analyse the Singapore government's recent attempt to make Singapore a “Global Schoolhouse” by transforming its tertiary education sector. It aims to examine the government's attempt to promote greater diversity and autonomy in the tertiary education landscape; it also aims to examine the government's systems of state funding and accountability for the tertiary education sector. Design/methodology/approach – The paper utilises a policy analysis approach to examine the development of the “Global Schoolhouse” in Singapore. In particular, it examines a case study of the setting up and subsequent sudden pullout of the University of New South Wales Asia (UNSW Asia) to highlight the increasing challenge faced by the government in this undertaking. Findings – Despite the government's promotion of greater diversity and autonomy in the tertiary education landscape, the government maintains centralised control through systems of accountability to, and funding from, the state. The case study of UNSW Asia shows that it is a paradoxical challenge for the government to engineer a tertiary education “market economy” with private foreign players while maintaining centralised control over the achievement of its strategic agenda within its stipulated time frame. Research limitations/implications – The analysis of the Singapore “Global Schoolhouse” effort is limited to a general review of the higher education scene in Singapore and a case study. Practical implications – The study of Singapore serves as a mirror to other developing countries in understanding the challenges in developing a “Global Schoolhouse” while trying to maintain centralised control. Originality/value – This paper provides an analysis of the recent developments in the Singapore “Global Schoolhouse” effort. © 2010, Emerald Group Publishing Limited
Persistent Identifierhttp://hdl.handle.net/10722/307024
ISSN
2023 Impact Factor: 2.4
2023 SCImago Journal Rankings: 0.615
ISI Accession Number ID

 

DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorTee ng, Pak-
dc.contributor.authorTan, Charlene-
dc.date.accessioned2021-11-03T06:21:46Z-
dc.date.available2021-11-03T06:21:46Z-
dc.date.issued2010-
dc.identifier.citationInternational Journal of Educational Management, 2010, v. 24, n. 3, p. 178-188-
dc.identifier.issn0951-354X-
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10722/307024-
dc.description.abstractPurpose – This paper seeks to analyse the Singapore government's recent attempt to make Singapore a “Global Schoolhouse” by transforming its tertiary education sector. It aims to examine the government's attempt to promote greater diversity and autonomy in the tertiary education landscape; it also aims to examine the government's systems of state funding and accountability for the tertiary education sector. Design/methodology/approach – The paper utilises a policy analysis approach to examine the development of the “Global Schoolhouse” in Singapore. In particular, it examines a case study of the setting up and subsequent sudden pullout of the University of New South Wales Asia (UNSW Asia) to highlight the increasing challenge faced by the government in this undertaking. Findings – Despite the government's promotion of greater diversity and autonomy in the tertiary education landscape, the government maintains centralised control through systems of accountability to, and funding from, the state. The case study of UNSW Asia shows that it is a paradoxical challenge for the government to engineer a tertiary education “market economy” with private foreign players while maintaining centralised control over the achievement of its strategic agenda within its stipulated time frame. Research limitations/implications – The analysis of the Singapore “Global Schoolhouse” effort is limited to a general review of the higher education scene in Singapore and a case study. Practical implications – The study of Singapore serves as a mirror to other developing countries in understanding the challenges in developing a “Global Schoolhouse” while trying to maintain centralised control. Originality/value – This paper provides an analysis of the recent developments in the Singapore “Global Schoolhouse” effort. © 2010, Emerald Group Publishing Limited-
dc.languageeng-
dc.relation.ispartofInternational Journal of Educational Management-
dc.subjectHigher education-
dc.subjectMarket economy-
dc.subjectCentralized control-
dc.subjectSingapore-
dc.titleThe Singapore Global Schoolhouse: An analysis of the development of the tertiary education landscape in Singapore-
dc.typeArticle-
dc.description.naturelink_to_subscribed_fulltext-
dc.identifier.doi10.1108/09513541011031556-
dc.identifier.scopuseid_2-s2.0-77949552639-
dc.identifier.volume24-
dc.identifier.issue3-
dc.identifier.spage178-
dc.identifier.epage188-
dc.identifier.isiWOS:000211390700002-

Export via OAI-PMH Interface in XML Formats


OR


Export to Other Non-XML Formats