File Download
There are no files associated with this item.
Links for fulltext
(May Require Subscription)
- Publisher Website: 10.1016/j.ijedudev.2021.102403
- Scopus: eid_2-s2.0-85104463678
- WOS: WOS:000694908500005
- Find via
Supplementary
- Citations:
- Appears in Collections:
Article: Social equity and equity in higher education: A comparison of the liberal Anglo-American and Chinese political cultures
Title | Social equity and equity in higher education: A comparison of the liberal Anglo-American and Chinese political cultures |
---|---|
Authors | |
Keywords | Comparison Confucianism Higher education Liberalism Social equity |
Issue Date | 2021 |
Citation | International Journal of Educational Development, 2021, v. 84, article no. 102403 How to Cite? |
Abstract | This study compares the ideas of social equity in the liberal Anglo-American and Chinese political cultures and seeks potential hybridisations. Through a conceptual examination of scholarly works, this study identifies differences and similarities of social equity between the two political cultures. A common conceptual bridge, deriving from the comparison and hybridisation, is further developed for the discussion of social equity and equity in higher education across the two cultures. The common bridge consists of four constitutes of social equity: political and civil equality, social and economic equality, equality of opportunity and equality of potential and freedom to achieve, the last of which is new hybridity of the two political cultures. This study argues that the hybridity – equality of potential and freedom to achieve – is enlightening to the discussion of equity in higher education as well as social equity across contexts. |
Persistent Identifier | http://hdl.handle.net/10722/311510 |
ISSN | 2021 Impact Factor: 1.873 2020 SCImago Journal Rankings: 0.848 |
ISI Accession Number ID |
DC Field | Value | Language |
---|---|---|
dc.contributor.author | Yang, Lili | - |
dc.date.accessioned | 2022-03-22T11:54:06Z | - |
dc.date.available | 2022-03-22T11:54:06Z | - |
dc.date.issued | 2021 | - |
dc.identifier.citation | International Journal of Educational Development, 2021, v. 84, article no. 102403 | - |
dc.identifier.issn | 0738-0593 | - |
dc.identifier.uri | http://hdl.handle.net/10722/311510 | - |
dc.description.abstract | This study compares the ideas of social equity in the liberal Anglo-American and Chinese political cultures and seeks potential hybridisations. Through a conceptual examination of scholarly works, this study identifies differences and similarities of social equity between the two political cultures. A common conceptual bridge, deriving from the comparison and hybridisation, is further developed for the discussion of social equity and equity in higher education across the two cultures. The common bridge consists of four constitutes of social equity: political and civil equality, social and economic equality, equality of opportunity and equality of potential and freedom to achieve, the last of which is new hybridity of the two political cultures. This study argues that the hybridity – equality of potential and freedom to achieve – is enlightening to the discussion of equity in higher education as well as social equity across contexts. | - |
dc.language | eng | - |
dc.relation.ispartof | International Journal of Educational Development | - |
dc.subject | Comparison | - |
dc.subject | Confucianism | - |
dc.subject | Higher education | - |
dc.subject | Liberalism | - |
dc.subject | Social equity | - |
dc.title | Social equity and equity in higher education: A comparison of the liberal Anglo-American and Chinese political cultures | - |
dc.type | Article | - |
dc.description.nature | link_to_subscribed_fulltext | - |
dc.identifier.doi | 10.1016/j.ijedudev.2021.102403 | - |
dc.identifier.scopus | eid_2-s2.0-85104463678 | - |
dc.identifier.volume | 84 | - |
dc.identifier.spage | article no. 102403 | - |
dc.identifier.epage | article no. 102403 | - |
dc.identifier.isi | WOS:000694908500005 | - |