File Download

There are no files associated with this item.

  Links for fulltext
     (May Require Subscription)
Supplementary

Article: Social equity and equity in higher education: A comparison of the liberal Anglo-American and Chinese political cultures

TitleSocial equity and equity in higher education: A comparison of the liberal Anglo-American and Chinese political cultures
Authors
KeywordsComparison
Confucianism
Higher education
Liberalism
Social equity
Issue Date2021
Citation
International Journal of Educational Development, 2021, v. 84, article no. 102403 How to Cite?
AbstractThis study compares the ideas of social equity in the liberal Anglo-American and Chinese political cultures and seeks potential hybridisations. Through a conceptual examination of scholarly works, this study identifies differences and similarities of social equity between the two political cultures. A common conceptual bridge, deriving from the comparison and hybridisation, is further developed for the discussion of social equity and equity in higher education across the two cultures. The common bridge consists of four constitutes of social equity: political and civil equality, social and economic equality, equality of opportunity and equality of potential and freedom to achieve, the last of which is new hybridity of the two political cultures. This study argues that the hybridity – equality of potential and freedom to achieve – is enlightening to the discussion of equity in higher education as well as social equity across contexts.
Persistent Identifierhttp://hdl.handle.net/10722/311510
ISSN
2021 Impact Factor: 1.873
2020 SCImago Journal Rankings: 0.848
ISI Accession Number ID

 

DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorYang, Lili-
dc.date.accessioned2022-03-22T11:54:06Z-
dc.date.available2022-03-22T11:54:06Z-
dc.date.issued2021-
dc.identifier.citationInternational Journal of Educational Development, 2021, v. 84, article no. 102403-
dc.identifier.issn0738-0593-
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10722/311510-
dc.description.abstractThis study compares the ideas of social equity in the liberal Anglo-American and Chinese political cultures and seeks potential hybridisations. Through a conceptual examination of scholarly works, this study identifies differences and similarities of social equity between the two political cultures. A common conceptual bridge, deriving from the comparison and hybridisation, is further developed for the discussion of social equity and equity in higher education across the two cultures. The common bridge consists of four constitutes of social equity: political and civil equality, social and economic equality, equality of opportunity and equality of potential and freedom to achieve, the last of which is new hybridity of the two political cultures. This study argues that the hybridity – equality of potential and freedom to achieve – is enlightening to the discussion of equity in higher education as well as social equity across contexts.-
dc.languageeng-
dc.relation.ispartofInternational Journal of Educational Development-
dc.subjectComparison-
dc.subjectConfucianism-
dc.subjectHigher education-
dc.subjectLiberalism-
dc.subjectSocial equity-
dc.titleSocial equity and equity in higher education: A comparison of the liberal Anglo-American and Chinese political cultures-
dc.typeArticle-
dc.description.naturelink_to_subscribed_fulltext-
dc.identifier.doi10.1016/j.ijedudev.2021.102403-
dc.identifier.scopuseid_2-s2.0-85104463678-
dc.identifier.volume84-
dc.identifier.spagearticle no. 102403-
dc.identifier.epagearticle no. 102403-
dc.identifier.isiWOS:000694908500005-

Export via OAI-PMH Interface in XML Formats


OR


Export to Other Non-XML Formats