File Download

There are no files associated with this item.

  Links for fulltext
     (May Require Subscription)
Supplementary

Article: Acute kidney injury in traumatic brain injury intensive care unit patients

TitleAcute kidney injury in traumatic brain injury intensive care unit patients
Authors
Issue Date2022
Citation
World J Clin Cases, 2022, v. 10 n. 9, p. 2751-2763 How to Cite?
AbstractBACKGROUND: The exact definition of Acute kidney injury (AKI) for patients with traumatic brain injury (TBI) is unknown. AIM: To compare the power of the "Risk, Injury, Failure, Loss of kidney function, and End-stage kidney disease" (RIFLE), Acute Kidney Injury Network (AKIN), Creatinine kinetics (CK), and Kidney Disease Improving Global Outcomes (KDIGO) to determine AKI incidence/stage and their association with the in-hospital mortality rate of patients with TBI. METHODS: This retrospective study collected the data of patients admitted to the intensive care unit for neurotrauma from 2001 to 2012, and 1648 patients were included. The subjects in this study were assessed for the presence and stage of AKI using RIFLE, AKIN, CK, and KDIGO. In addition, the propensity score matching method was used. RESULTS: Among the 1648 patients, 291 (17.7%) had AKI, according to KDIGO. The highest incidence of AKI was found by KDIGO (17.7%), followed by AKIN (17.1%), RIFLE (12.7%), and CK (11.5%) (P = 0.97). Concordance between KDIGO and RIFLE/AKIN/CK was 99.3%/99.1%/99.3% for stage 0, 36.0%/91.5%/44.5% for stage 1, 35.9%/90.6%/11.3% for stage 2, and 47.4%/89.5%/36.8% for stage 3. The in-hospital mortality rates increased with the AKI stage in all four definitions. The severity of AKI by all definitions and stages was not associated with in-hospital mortality in the multivariable analyses (all P > 0.05). CONCLUSION: Differences are seen in AKI diagnosis and in-hospital mortality among the four AKI definitions or stages. This study revealed that KDIGO is the best method to define AKI in patients with TBI.
Persistent Identifierhttp://hdl.handle.net/10722/315810
ISSN
2023 Impact Factor: 1.0
ISI Accession Number ID

 

DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorHuang, ZY-
dc.contributor.authorLiu, Y-
dc.contributor.authorHuang, HF-
dc.contributor.authorHuang, SH-
dc.contributor.authorWang, JX-
dc.contributor.authorTian, JF-
dc.contributor.authorZeng, WX-
dc.contributor.authorLv, RG-
dc.contributor.authorJiang, S-
dc.contributor.authorGao, J-
dc.contributor.authorGao, Y-
dc.contributor.authorYu, XX-
dc.date.accessioned2022-08-19T09:04:51Z-
dc.date.available2022-08-19T09:04:51Z-
dc.date.issued2022-
dc.identifier.citationWorld J Clin Cases, 2022, v. 10 n. 9, p. 2751-2763-
dc.identifier.issn2307-8960-
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10722/315810-
dc.description.abstractBACKGROUND: The exact definition of Acute kidney injury (AKI) for patients with traumatic brain injury (TBI) is unknown. AIM: To compare the power of the "Risk, Injury, Failure, Loss of kidney function, and End-stage kidney disease" (RIFLE), Acute Kidney Injury Network (AKIN), Creatinine kinetics (CK), and Kidney Disease Improving Global Outcomes (KDIGO) to determine AKI incidence/stage and their association with the in-hospital mortality rate of patients with TBI. METHODS: This retrospective study collected the data of patients admitted to the intensive care unit for neurotrauma from 2001 to 2012, and 1648 patients were included. The subjects in this study were assessed for the presence and stage of AKI using RIFLE, AKIN, CK, and KDIGO. In addition, the propensity score matching method was used. RESULTS: Among the 1648 patients, 291 (17.7%) had AKI, according to KDIGO. The highest incidence of AKI was found by KDIGO (17.7%), followed by AKIN (17.1%), RIFLE (12.7%), and CK (11.5%) (P = 0.97). Concordance between KDIGO and RIFLE/AKIN/CK was 99.3%/99.1%/99.3% for stage 0, 36.0%/91.5%/44.5% for stage 1, 35.9%/90.6%/11.3% for stage 2, and 47.4%/89.5%/36.8% for stage 3. The in-hospital mortality rates increased with the AKI stage in all four definitions. The severity of AKI by all definitions and stages was not associated with in-hospital mortality in the multivariable analyses (all P > 0.05). CONCLUSION: Differences are seen in AKI diagnosis and in-hospital mortality among the four AKI definitions or stages. This study revealed that KDIGO is the best method to define AKI in patients with TBI.-
dc.languageeng-
dc.relation.ispartofWorld J Clin Cases-
dc.titleAcute kidney injury in traumatic brain injury intensive care unit patients-
dc.typeArticle-
dc.identifier.emailGao, J: galeng@hku.hk-
dc.identifier.doi10.12998/wjcc.v10.i9.2751-
dc.identifier.hkuros335824-
dc.identifier.volume10-
dc.identifier.issue9-
dc.identifier.spage2751-
dc.identifier.epage2763-
dc.identifier.isiWOS:000797377600009-

Export via OAI-PMH Interface in XML Formats


OR


Export to Other Non-XML Formats