File Download

There are no files associated with this item.

  Links for fulltext
     (May Require Subscription)
Supplementary

Article: Police and Politics in Aesthetics‐Based Urban Governance: Redevelopment and Grassroots Struggles in Enninglu, Guangzhou, China

TitlePolice and Politics in Aesthetics‐Based Urban Governance: Redevelopment and Grassroots Struggles in Enninglu, Guangzhou, China
Authors
Issue Date2023
Citation
Antipode, 2023 How to Cite?
AbstractRanciere’s theorisation of police, politics, and aesthetics offers an illustrative framework to understand urban (re)developments. While extant works have examined separately the art of governing through aesthetics and the political subjectivities of those having no part in the frame of visibility and intelligibility, this study argues that hegemonic aesthetic regime and bottom-up aesthetic practices can be mutually constitutive and reside in relationships of co-existence and mutual negotiation. Drawing on over a decade’s investigation in Enninglu, a neighbourhood district in Guangzhou that underwent several rounds of political struggles related to redevelopment and conservation, we reveal how local residents negotiated aesthetic norms enacted by the state. Particular attention is paid to the interactions between the aesthetic regime imposed by the state and grassroots people reclaiming their own aesthetic sensibilities, culminating in a contingent, inconclusive, and “impure” space of politics. Both political subjectivities and aesthetic norms are redefined ongoingly in this process.
Persistent Identifierhttp://hdl.handle.net/10722/324678
ISI Accession Number ID

 

DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorHe, S-
dc.contributor.authorQian, J-
dc.date.accessioned2023-02-20T01:34:46Z-
dc.date.available2023-02-20T01:34:46Z-
dc.date.issued2023-
dc.identifier.citationAntipode, 2023-
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10722/324678-
dc.description.abstractRanciere’s theorisation of police, politics, and aesthetics offers an illustrative framework to understand urban (re)developments. While extant works have examined separately the art of governing through aesthetics and the political subjectivities of those having no part in the frame of visibility and intelligibility, this study argues that hegemonic aesthetic regime and bottom-up aesthetic practices can be mutually constitutive and reside in relationships of co-existence and mutual negotiation. Drawing on over a decade’s investigation in Enninglu, a neighbourhood district in Guangzhou that underwent several rounds of political struggles related to redevelopment and conservation, we reveal how local residents negotiated aesthetic norms enacted by the state. Particular attention is paid to the interactions between the aesthetic regime imposed by the state and grassroots people reclaiming their own aesthetic sensibilities, culminating in a contingent, inconclusive, and “impure” space of politics. Both political subjectivities and aesthetic norms are redefined ongoingly in this process.-
dc.languageeng-
dc.relation.ispartofAntipode-
dc.titlePolice and Politics in Aesthetics‐Based Urban Governance: Redevelopment and Grassroots Struggles in Enninglu, Guangzhou, China-
dc.typeArticle-
dc.identifier.emailHe, S: sjhe@hku.hk-
dc.identifier.emailQian, J: jxqian@hku.hk-
dc.identifier.authorityHe, S=rp01996-
dc.identifier.authorityQian, J=rp02246-
dc.identifier.doi10.1111/anti.12919-
dc.identifier.hkuros343706-
dc.identifier.isiWOS:000922673600001-

Export via OAI-PMH Interface in XML Formats


OR


Export to Other Non-XML Formats