File Download
  Links for fulltext
     (May Require Subscription)
Supplementary

Article: Reliability, validity, and measurement invariance of a Chinese Handwriting Legibility Scale among primary students in China

TitleReliability, validity, and measurement invariance of a Chinese Handwriting Legibility Scale among primary students in China
Authors
KeywordsChinese handwriting
development and validation
legibility
primary school students
spatial cognition
Issue Date28-Jul-2023
PublisherFrontiers Media
Citation
Frontiers in Psychology, 2023, v. 14 How to Cite?
Abstract

Background: Chinese handwriting has a close relationship with spatial cognition, and the legibility dimension is prominent with its spatial-oriented characteristics. However, handwriting evaluation focusing on the detailed spatial aspects of the legibility dimension in the Chinese context is rare.

Aims and methods: We aimed to develop a Chinese Handwriting Legibility Scale (CHLS) and examine its reliability, validity, and measurement invariance among Chinese primary students of different grades. A total of 684 students aged 8–12 years were recruited from a mainstream primary school in central China and were asked to copy a Chinese template as legibly as possible within 4 min. The developed CHLS was used to assess these students’ legibility performance.

Results: The seven-criteria CHLS favored content validity. The inter-rater reliability was good; however, the scoring instructions need to be refined. Principal component analysis (PCA) revealed a one-factor solution explaining 62.336% of the variance of the seven-criteria CHLS, and confirmatory factor analysis (CFA) confirmed its appropriateness. There was a high internal consistency (α = 0.902). In terms of measurement invariance, the factor structures and loadings of the CHLS were consistent across students of different grades; however, significant intercept variations were detected between students of Grades 2 and 4.

Conclusion: CHLS may be effective for evaluating Chinese handwriting legibility performance in the Chinese primary school context in the central region. Students’ Chinese handwriting legibility performance may have developmental specificity in different grades.


Persistent Identifierhttp://hdl.handle.net/10722/331227
ISSN
2021 Impact Factor: 4.232
2020 SCImago Journal Rankings: 0.947

 

DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorLu, H-
dc.contributor.authorChen, X-
dc.contributor.authorLeung, FKS-
dc.contributor.authorZuo, H-
dc.date.accessioned2023-09-21T06:53:52Z-
dc.date.available2023-09-21T06:53:52Z-
dc.date.issued2023-07-28-
dc.identifier.citationFrontiers in Psychology, 2023, v. 14-
dc.identifier.issn1664-1078-
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10722/331227-
dc.description.abstract<p><strong>Background:</strong> Chinese handwriting has a close relationship with spatial cognition, and the legibility dimension is prominent with its spatial-oriented characteristics. However, handwriting evaluation focusing on the detailed spatial aspects of the legibility dimension in the Chinese context is rare.</p><p><strong>Aims and methods:</strong> We aimed to develop a Chinese Handwriting Legibility Scale (CHLS) and examine its reliability, validity, and measurement invariance among Chinese primary students of different grades. A total of 684 students aged 8–12 years were recruited from a mainstream primary school in central China and were asked to copy a Chinese template as legibly as possible within 4 min. The developed CHLS was used to assess these students’ legibility performance.</p><p><strong>Results:</strong> The seven-criteria CHLS favored content validity. The inter-rater reliability was good; however, the scoring instructions need to be refined. Principal component analysis (PCA) revealed a one-factor solution explaining 62.336% of the variance of the seven-criteria CHLS, and confirmatory factor analysis (CFA) confirmed its appropriateness. There was a high internal consistency (<em>α</em> = 0.902). In terms of measurement invariance, the factor structures and loadings of the CHLS were consistent across students of different grades; however, significant intercept variations were detected between students of Grades 2 and 4.</p><p><strong>Conclusion:</strong> CHLS may be effective for evaluating Chinese handwriting legibility performance in the Chinese primary school context in the central region. Students’ Chinese handwriting legibility performance may have developmental specificity in different grades.</p>-
dc.languageeng-
dc.publisherFrontiers Media-
dc.relation.ispartofFrontiers in Psychology-
dc.rightsThis work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.-
dc.subjectChinese handwriting-
dc.subjectdevelopment and validation-
dc.subjectlegibility-
dc.subjectprimary school students-
dc.subjectspatial cognition-
dc.titleReliability, validity, and measurement invariance of a Chinese Handwriting Legibility Scale among primary students in China-
dc.typeArticle-
dc.description.naturepublished_or_final_version-
dc.identifier.doi10.3389/fpsyg.2023.1050894-
dc.identifier.scopuseid_2-s2.0-85167620373-
dc.identifier.volume14-
dc.identifier.eissn1664-1078-
dc.identifier.issnl1664-1078-

Export via OAI-PMH Interface in XML Formats


OR


Export to Other Non-XML Formats