File Download

There are no files associated with this item.

  Links for fulltext
     (May Require Subscription)
Supplementary

Article: Identifying precision AD biomarkers with varying prognosis effects in genetics driven subpopulations

TitleIdentifying precision AD biomarkers with varying prognosis effects in genetics driven subpopulations
Authors
Issue Date1-Feb-2022
PublisherWiley
Citation
Alzheimer's & Dementia: The Journal of the Alzheimer's Association, 2021, v. 17, n. S4 How to Cite?
Abstract

Background

Imaging, cognitive and fluid data have been widely studied to identify quantitative biomarkers that can help predict the status and progression of Alzheimer’s disease (AD). However, it is still an underexplored topic whether there exist subpopulations with different genetic profiles across which the biomarker-based prediction models may vary. We propose to use the Chow test (Chow 1960 Econometrica 28(3)) to perform genetically stratified analyses for identifying SNP-based subpopulations coupled with precision AD biomarkers with varying effects on future diagnosis in these subpopulations. The investigation of such SNPs and precision biomarkers may eventually pave the way for increased customization of AD care.

Method

Participants included 1,324 subjects from the ADNI cohort with both AD biomarker and genotyping data available (http://www.pi4cs.org/qt-pad-challenge). 30 significant (P < 1.5E-278) AD SNPs were sourced from (Jansen 2019 NatGen). Chow tests were performed to determine whether each of baseline visit measures of 16 AD biomarkers predicted AD diagnosis at the three-year visit with varying slopes when stratifying upon the allelic dosage of each of 30 chosen SNPs. Bonferroni correction (P < 1.04E-4) was employed to correct for multiple comparisons.

Result

Multiple SNP-biomarker pairs showed significant genetically driven deviations in the regression coefficients when predicting diagnosis in three years using baseline biomarkers (Figure 1). Top SNP hits involved rs769449 (Chr 19, APOE) and rs7561528 (Chr 2, LOC105373605), and almost all 16 studied biomarkers demonstrated differential slopes in different genotype groups to predict diagnosis in three years. To examine the details of these top findings, the regression coefficients calculated for each of the five most significant biomarkers of both SNPs were bootstrapped and plotted in Figure 2.

Conclusion

Genetic analysis of AD candidate SNPs in conjunction with AD biomarker data via the Chow test identified several SNPs coupled with precision AD biomarkers with varying prognosis effects in the corresponding genotype groups. These findings provide valuable information to reveal disease heterogeneity and help facilitate precision medicine.


Persistent Identifierhttp://hdl.handle.net/10722/331531
ISSN
2023 Impact Factor: 13.0
2023 SCImago Journal Rankings: 3.226

 

DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorLee, Brian N-
dc.contributor.authorWang, Junwen-
dc.contributor.authorShen, Li-
dc.date.accessioned2023-09-21T06:56:40Z-
dc.date.available2023-09-21T06:56:40Z-
dc.date.issued2022-02-01-
dc.identifier.citationAlzheimer's & Dementia: The Journal of the Alzheimer's Association, 2021, v. 17, n. S4-
dc.identifier.issn1552-5260-
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10722/331531-
dc.description.abstract<h3>Background</h3><p>Imaging, cognitive and fluid data have been widely studied to identify quantitative biomarkers that can help predict the status and progression of Alzheimer’s disease (AD). However, it is still an underexplored topic whether there exist subpopulations with different genetic profiles across which the biomarker-based prediction models may vary. We propose to use the Chow test (Chow 1960 Econometrica 28(3)) to perform genetically stratified analyses for identifying SNP-based subpopulations coupled with precision AD biomarkers with varying effects on future diagnosis in these subpopulations. The investigation of such SNPs and precision biomarkers may eventually pave the way for increased customization of AD care.</p><h3>Method</h3><p>Participants included 1,324 subjects from the ADNI cohort with both AD biomarker and genotyping data available (<a href="http://www.pi4cs.org/qt-pad-challenge">http://www.pi4cs.org/qt-pad-challenge</a>). 30 significant (<em>P < 1.5E-278</em>) AD SNPs were sourced from (Jansen 2019 NatGen). Chow tests were performed to determine whether each of baseline visit measures of 16 AD biomarkers predicted AD diagnosis at the three-year visit with varying slopes when stratifying upon the allelic dosage of each of 30 chosen SNPs. Bonferroni correction (<em>P < 1.04E-4</em>) was employed to correct for multiple comparisons.</p><h3>Result</h3><p>Multiple SNP-biomarker pairs showed significant genetically driven deviations in the regression coefficients when predicting diagnosis in three years using baseline biomarkers (Figure 1). Top SNP hits involved rs769449 (Chr 19, <em>APOE</em>) and rs7561528 (Chr 2, <em>LOC105373605</em>), and almost all 16 studied biomarkers demonstrated differential slopes in different genotype groups to predict diagnosis in three years. To examine the details of these top findings, the regression coefficients calculated for each of the five most significant biomarkers of both SNPs were bootstrapped and plotted in Figure 2.</p><h3>Conclusion</h3><p>Genetic analysis of AD candidate SNPs in conjunction with AD biomarker data via the Chow test identified several SNPs coupled with precision AD biomarkers with varying prognosis effects in the corresponding genotype groups. These findings provide valuable information to reveal disease heterogeneity and help facilitate precision medicine.</p>-
dc.languageeng-
dc.publisherWiley-
dc.relation.ispartofAlzheimer's & Dementia: The Journal of the Alzheimer's Association-
dc.rightsThis work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.-
dc.titleIdentifying precision AD biomarkers with varying prognosis effects in genetics driven subpopulations-
dc.typeArticle-
dc.identifier.doi10.1002/alz.053201-
dc.identifier.volume17-
dc.identifier.issueS4-
dc.identifier.eissn1552-5279-
dc.identifier.issnl1552-5260-

Export via OAI-PMH Interface in XML Formats


OR


Export to Other Non-XML Formats