File Download

There are no files associated with this item.

  Links for fulltext
     (May Require Subscription)
Supplementary

Article: Gender inequality and bias in Chinese universities: perceptions of male and female academics

TitleGender inequality and bias in Chinese universities: perceptions of male and female academics
Authors
Keywordsacademic profession
Chinese universities
gender inequality
Issue Date1-Jan-2023
PublisherTaylor and Francis Group
Citation
Higher Education Research & Development, 2023, v. 42, n. 8, p. 1954-1969 How to Cite?
Abstract

Gender inequality and bias persists in academia worldwide despite remarkable progress in recent decades. This issue is underexplored in the context of Chinese academia. Drawing on 40 semi-structured interviews with male and female academics at a Chinese research university, this paper assesses the extent and manifestations of gender inequality, bias, and discrimination in the Chinese academic profession. The findings show that most of the male academics had gender-blind perspectives and believed that Chinese academia has an egalitarian structure that is fairer to women than other sectors of activity, and allows them to attain career success. Concurrently, some were suspicious of female academics’ success and explained it based on sexual innuendo. Nonetheless, a considerable number of male academics felt privileged compared to women, explaining this privilege in terms of social and biological factors. The female academics mostly perceived no overt discrimination in academia but described subtle discrimination and biases in which gender could shape opportunities and career advancement. Our findings highlight differences in the perceptions of male and female academics, the prevalence of male power in academia, and micropolitical practices that (re)produce gender inequality.


Persistent Identifierhttp://hdl.handle.net/10722/337070
ISSN
2023 Impact Factor: 2.6
2023 SCImago Journal Rankings: 1.428
ISI Accession Number ID

 

DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorHorta, H-
dc.contributor.authorTang, L-
dc.date.accessioned2024-03-11T10:17:52Z-
dc.date.available2024-03-11T10:17:52Z-
dc.date.issued2023-01-01-
dc.identifier.citationHigher Education Research & Development, 2023, v. 42, n. 8, p. 1954-1969-
dc.identifier.issn0729-4360-
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10722/337070-
dc.description.abstract<p>Gender inequality and bias persists in academia worldwide despite remarkable progress in recent decades. This issue is underexplored in the context of Chinese academia. Drawing on 40 semi-structured interviews with male and female academics at a Chinese research university, this paper assesses the extent and manifestations of gender inequality, bias, and discrimination in the Chinese academic profession. The findings show that most of the male academics had gender-blind perspectives and believed that Chinese academia has an egalitarian structure that is fairer to women than other sectors of activity, and allows them to attain career success. Concurrently, some were suspicious of female academics’ success and explained it based on sexual innuendo. Nonetheless, a considerable number of male academics felt privileged compared to women, explaining this privilege in terms of social and biological factors. The female academics mostly perceived no overt discrimination in academia but described subtle discrimination and biases in which gender could shape opportunities and career advancement. Our findings highlight differences in the perceptions of male and female academics, the prevalence of male power in academia, and micropolitical practices that (re)produce gender inequality.</p>-
dc.languageeng-
dc.publisherTaylor and Francis Group-
dc.relation.ispartofHigher Education Research & Development-
dc.rightsThis work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.-
dc.subjectacademic profession-
dc.subjectChinese universities-
dc.subjectgender inequality-
dc.titleGender inequality and bias in Chinese universities: perceptions of male and female academics-
dc.typeArticle-
dc.identifier.doi10.1080/07294360.2023.2197193-
dc.identifier.scopuseid_2-s2.0-85152955074-
dc.identifier.volume42-
dc.identifier.issue8-
dc.identifier.spage1954-
dc.identifier.epage1969-
dc.identifier.eissn1469-8366-
dc.identifier.isiWOS:000971962200001-
dc.identifier.issnl0729-4360-

Export via OAI-PMH Interface in XML Formats


OR


Export to Other Non-XML Formats