File Download

There are no files associated with this item.

Supplementary

Conference Paper: Non-apathetic political neutrality exacerbates violence and mental health problems: triangulating online and offline data

TitleNon-apathetic political neutrality exacerbates violence and mental health problems: triangulating online and offline data
Authors
Issue Date4-Nov-2022
Abstract

Those who claim to be politically neutral are often neglected in the study of politically divided societies. Little is known about the nature of their neutrality; whether or not they are politically apathetic. During the 2019 social unrest, Hong Kong was divided into two politically opposed camps: the pro-government and the anti-government. In this study, we investigated how non-apathetic political neutrality impacted violence and mental well-being in this period.


We triangulated online and offline data, with a focus on political identification, acceptance of violence, and mental well-being. We examined politically polarized social media data (N = 39,487,911) in 2019 as well as survey data from young adults (N = 657) aged between 18 and 30 in 2021. We analyzed the data using text mining, machine learning, latent profile analyses, latent markov models, generalized linear models, and generalized estimating equations.


Both online and offline findings revealed a category of non-apathetic political neutrality. Survey findings showed that self-identified political neutrals have non-apathetic attitudes that favored or opposed violence toward politically polarized groups. Furthermore, non-apathetic political neutrals were more likely to exacerbate violence and mental distress (e.g., depression) than individuals in other categories of political attitudes.


Political neutrality does not reflect political apathy. In addition to the traditional binary political spectrum, the identified political neutrality is an important dimension of political polarization. Those that are non-apathetically neutral may in fact be aggressive neutral, potentially constituting as a third group in politically polarized societies. Further investigation is needed to reveal the underlying mechanism of non-apathetic political neutrality on violence.


Persistent Identifierhttp://hdl.handle.net/10722/337687

 

DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorLam, C-
dc.contributor.authorChan, CS-
dc.date.accessioned2024-03-11T10:23:06Z-
dc.date.available2024-03-11T10:23:06Z-
dc.date.issued2022-11-04-
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10722/337687-
dc.description.abstract<p>Those who claim to be politically neutral are often neglected in the study of politically divided societies. Little is known about the nature of their neutrality; whether or not they are politically apathetic. During the 2019 social unrest, Hong Kong was divided into two politically opposed camps: the pro-government and the anti-government. In this study, we investigated how <em>non-apathetic political neutrality</em> impacted violence and mental well-being in this period.</p><p><br></p><p>We triangulated online and offline data, with a focus on political identification, acceptance of violence, and mental well-being. We examined politically polarized social media data (<em>N</em> = 39,487,911) in 2019 as well as survey data from young adults (<em>N</em> = 657) aged between 18 and 30 in 2021. We analyzed the data using text mining, machine learning, latent profile analyses, latent markov models, generalized linear models, and generalized estimating equations.</p><p><br></p><p>Both online and offline findings revealed a category of non-apathetic political neutrality. Survey findings showed that self-identified political neutrals have non-apathetic attitudes that favored or opposed violence toward politically polarized groups. Furthermore, non-apathetic political neutrals were more likely to exacerbate violence and mental distress (e.g., depression) than individuals in other categories of political attitudes.</p><p><br></p><p>Political neutrality does not reflect political apathy. In addition to the traditional binary political spectrum, the identified political neutrality is an important dimension of political polarization. Those that are non-apathetically neutral may in fact be a<em>ggressive neutral</em>, potentially constituting as a third group in politically polarized societies. Further investigation is needed to reveal the underlying mechanism of non-apathetic political neutrality on violence.</p>-
dc.languageeng-
dc.relation.ispartofEASP: Deeply Divided Societies: Social Psychological Processes and Theorising (04/11/2022-06/11/2022, Nicosia)-
dc.titleNon-apathetic political neutrality exacerbates violence and mental health problems: triangulating online and offline data-
dc.typeConference_Paper-

Export via OAI-PMH Interface in XML Formats


OR


Export to Other Non-XML Formats