Prophylactic anti‐reflux procedure for children undergoing laparoscopic gastrostomy: Rethinking of the routine practice

Abstract

<h3>Aim</h3><p>Laparoscopic gastrostomy is a frequently performed procedure in children requiring long-term enteral nutrition. The role of prophylactic anti-reflux surgery during gastrostomy placements is controversial. The current study aims to evaluate the role of prophylactic anti-reflux procedures during gastrostomy placement.</p><h3>Methods</h3><p>A retrospective single-center analysis of all children without reflux receiving laparoscopic gastrostomy from January 2005 through December 2021 was performed. Demographics and clinical outcomes were compared between patients receiving gastrostomy placement alone and patients receiving gastrostomy with prophylactic anti-reflux surgery.</p><h3>Results</h3><p>A total of 79 patients had a confirmed absence of reflux by a 24-h pH/impedance study before operation. Thirty-six of these patients underwent prophylactic anti-reflux surgery (PAR) while 43 received gastrostomy (PG) alone. The operative time and conversion rate were significantly higher in the PAR group (140.5 ± 67.5 vs. 80.2 ± 66.8 min, <em>p</em> = 0.0001 and 8.3% vs. 0%, <em>p</em> = 0.04). There were no major complications in either group. De novo reflux was detected in five patients (11.6%) in the PG group. None of these patients progressed to require anti-reflux surgery.</p><h3>Conclusion</h3><p>The occurrence of de novo reflux after laparoscopic gastrostomy was low and could be managed without anti-reflux surgery. A routine pre-operative pH study is helpful for appropriate patient selection to avoid unnecessary anti-reflux surgery, which lengthens operative time and increases the conversion rate.</p>