File Download

There are no files associated with this item.

  Links for fulltext
     (May Require Subscription)
Supplementary

Article: Development and validation of a risk score (Delay-7) to predict the occurrence of a treatment delay following cycle 1 chemotherapy

TitleDevelopment and validation of a risk score (Delay-7) to predict the occurrence of a treatment delay following cycle 1 chemotherapy
Authors
Keywordsbreast cancer
chemotherapy
colorectal cancer
diffuse-large B-cell lymphoma
dose-delay
toxicity
Issue Date1-Feb-2023
PublisherElsevier
Citation
ESMO Open, 2023, v. 8, n. 1 How to Cite?
Abstract

Background: The risk of toxicity-related dose delays, with cancer treatment, should be included as part of pretreatment education and be considered by clinicians upon prescribing chemotherapy. An objective measure of individual risk could influence clinical decisions, such as escalation of standard supportive care and stratification of some patients, to receive proactive toxicity monitoring. Patients and methods: We developed a logistic regression prediction model (Delay-7) to assess the overall risk of a chemotherapy dose delay of 7 days for patients receiving first-line treatments for breast, colorectal and diffuse large B-cell lymphoma. Delay-7 included hospital treated, age at the start of chemotherapy, gender, ethnicity, body mass index, cancer diagnosis, chemotherapy regimen, colony stimulating factor use, first cycle dose modifications and baseline blood values. Baseline blood values included neutrophils, platelets, haemoglobin, creatinine and bilirubin. Shrinkage was used to adjust for overoptimism of predictor effects. For internal validation (of the full models in the development data) we computed the ability of the models to discriminate between those with and without poor outcomes (c-statistic), and the agreement between predicted and observed risk (calibration slope). Net benefit was used to understand the risk thresholds where the model would perform better than the ‘treat all’ or ‘treat none’ strategies. Results: A total of 4604 patients were included in our study of whom 628 (13.6%) incurred a 7-day delay to the second cycle of chemotherapy. Delay-7 showed good discrimination and calibration, with c-statistic of 0.68 (95% confidence interval 0.66-0.7), following internal validation and calibration-in-the-large of −0.006. Conclusions: Delay-7 predicts a patient's individualised risk of a treatment-related delay at cycle two of treatment. The score can be used to stratify interventions to reduce the occurrence of treatment-related toxicity.


Persistent Identifierhttp://hdl.handle.net/10722/344885
ISSN
2023 Impact Factor: 7.1
2023 SCImago Journal Rankings: 2.498

 

DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorChambers, P.-
dc.contributor.authorForster, M. D.-
dc.contributor.authorPatel, A.-
dc.contributor.authorDuncan, N.-
dc.contributor.authorKipps, E.-
dc.contributor.authorWong, I. C.K.-
dc.contributor.authorJani, Y.-
dc.contributor.authorWei, L.-
dc.date.accessioned2024-08-12T04:08:07Z-
dc.date.available2024-08-12T04:08:07Z-
dc.date.issued2023-02-01-
dc.identifier.citationESMO Open, 2023, v. 8, n. 1-
dc.identifier.issn2059-7029-
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10722/344885-
dc.description.abstract<p>Background: The risk of toxicity-related dose delays, with cancer treatment, should be included as part of pretreatment education and be considered by clinicians upon prescribing chemotherapy. An objective measure of individual risk could influence clinical decisions, such as escalation of standard supportive care and stratification of some patients, to receive proactive toxicity monitoring. Patients and methods: We developed a logistic regression prediction model (Delay-7) to assess the overall risk of a chemotherapy dose delay of 7 days for patients receiving first-line treatments for breast, colorectal and diffuse large B-cell lymphoma. Delay-7 included hospital treated, age at the start of chemotherapy, gender, ethnicity, body mass index, cancer diagnosis, chemotherapy regimen, colony stimulating factor use, first cycle dose modifications and baseline blood values. Baseline blood values included neutrophils, platelets, haemoglobin, creatinine and bilirubin. Shrinkage was used to adjust for overoptimism of predictor effects. For internal validation (of the full models in the development data) we computed the ability of the models to discriminate between those with and without poor outcomes (c-statistic), and the agreement between predicted and observed risk (calibration slope). Net benefit was used to understand the risk thresholds where the model would perform better than the ‘treat all’ or ‘treat none’ strategies. Results: A total of 4604 patients were included in our study of whom 628 (13.6%) incurred a 7-day delay to the second cycle of chemotherapy. Delay-7 showed good discrimination and calibration, with c-statistic of 0.68 (95% confidence interval 0.66-0.7), following internal validation and calibration-in-the-large of −0.006. Conclusions: Delay-7 predicts a patient's individualised risk of a treatment-related delay at cycle two of treatment. The score can be used to stratify interventions to reduce the occurrence of treatment-related toxicity.</p>-
dc.languageeng-
dc.publisherElsevier-
dc.relation.ispartofESMO Open-
dc.rightsThis work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.-
dc.subjectbreast cancer-
dc.subjectchemotherapy-
dc.subjectcolorectal cancer-
dc.subjectdiffuse-large B-cell lymphoma-
dc.subjectdose-delay-
dc.subjecttoxicity-
dc.titleDevelopment and validation of a risk score (Delay-7) to predict the occurrence of a treatment delay following cycle 1 chemotherapy-
dc.typeArticle-
dc.identifier.doi10.1016/j.esmoop.2022.100743-
dc.identifier.pmid36542904-
dc.identifier.scopuseid_2-s2.0-85144477868-
dc.identifier.volume8-
dc.identifier.issue1-
dc.identifier.eissn2059-7029-
dc.identifier.issnl2059-7029-

Export via OAI-PMH Interface in XML Formats


OR


Export to Other Non-XML Formats