File Download
  Links for fulltext
     (May Require Subscription)

Article: Sex-specific comparative outcomes between oral anticoagulants in patients with atrial fibrillation: a systematic review and meta-analysis

TitleSex-specific comparative outcomes between oral anticoagulants in patients with atrial fibrillation: a systematic review and meta-analysis
Authors
KeywordsAtrial Fibrillation
Meta-Analysis
Stroke
Systematic Reviews as Topic
Issue Date16-Jul-2024
PublisherBMJ Publishing Group
Citation
Open Heart, 2024, v. 11, n. 2 How to Cite?
Abstract

Aims Women with atrial fibrillation (AF) are under-represented in randomised controlled trials (RCTs) of direct oral anticoagulants (DOACs). This systematic review and meta-analysis of RCTs and observational studies examined sex-specific outcomes of DOACs in AF. Methods PubMed, Embase, Web of Science and Cochrane Library were searched from January 2008 to November 2022. Sex-specific comparative outcomes of stroke/systemic embolism (SE), major bleeding, intracranial haemorrhage (ICH) and gastrointestinal bleeding (GIB) between oral anticoagulants were pooled using random effects models. P values for interaction were calculated to examine differences in results between sexes. RCTs and observational studies were meta-analysed separately. Results 5 RCTs and 33 observational studies were included, totalling 1 085 931 women and 1 387 123 men. Meta-analyses showed that for both sexes, DOAC versus warfarin was generally associated with lower risk of stroke/SE, major bleeding and ICH; in DOAC-DOAC comparisons, rivaroxaban versus dabigatran had higher GIB risk. The only sex-specific difference observed was that when compared with warfarin, women had higher GIB risk with rivaroxaban (women: pooled risk ratio (pRR)=1.34, 95% CI=1.18 to 1.51; men: pRR=0.97, 95% CI=0.85 to 1.10; p value for interaction (p for interaction)<0.001) and possibly dabigatran (women: pRR=1.25, 95% CI=0.92 to 1.70; men: pRR=0.83, 95% CI=0.72 to 0.97; p-for-interaction=0.02). The sex difference in GIB remained for rivaroxaban when a Bonferroni-corrected significance level was used (α=0.003). No sex-specific GIB data for apixaban and edoxaban was available for the meta-analysis. Conclusions For both sexes, DOACs generally demonstrated favourable effectiveness and safety over warfarin. However, observational data suggested that women may have higher GIB risk with rivaroxaban and possibly dabigatran than warfarin. Further studies are warranted to verify our findings and elucidate sex-specific GIB risk with apixaban and edoxaban, of which the data is currently lacking. PROSPERO registration number CRD42022325027.


Persistent Identifierhttp://hdl.handle.net/10722/345718
ISSN

 

DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorChobanov, Jan D-
dc.contributor.authorWang, Zixuan-
dc.contributor.authorMan, Kenneth KC-
dc.contributor.authorDayib, Edil-
dc.contributor.authorLip, Gregory YH-
dc.contributor.authorHingorani, Aroon D-
dc.contributor.authorLeung, Wai K-
dc.contributor.authorWong, Ian CK-
dc.contributor.authorMongkhon, Pajaree-
dc.contributor.authorLau, Wallis CY-
dc.date.accessioned2024-08-27T09:10:42Z-
dc.date.available2024-08-27T09:10:42Z-
dc.date.issued2024-07-16-
dc.identifier.citationOpen Heart, 2024, v. 11, n. 2-
dc.identifier.issn2398-595X-
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10722/345718-
dc.description.abstract<p>Aims Women with atrial fibrillation (AF) are under-represented in randomised controlled trials (RCTs) of direct oral anticoagulants (DOACs). This systematic review and meta-analysis of RCTs and observational studies examined sex-specific outcomes of DOACs in AF. Methods PubMed, Embase, Web of Science and Cochrane Library were searched from January 2008 to November 2022. Sex-specific comparative outcomes of stroke/systemic embolism (SE), major bleeding, intracranial haemorrhage (ICH) and gastrointestinal bleeding (GIB) between oral anticoagulants were pooled using random effects models. P values for interaction were calculated to examine differences in results between sexes. RCTs and observational studies were meta-analysed separately. Results 5 RCTs and 33 observational studies were included, totalling 1 085 931 women and 1 387 123 men. Meta-analyses showed that for both sexes, DOAC versus warfarin was generally associated with lower risk of stroke/SE, major bleeding and ICH; in DOAC-DOAC comparisons, rivaroxaban versus dabigatran had higher GIB risk. The only sex-specific difference observed was that when compared with warfarin, women had higher GIB risk with rivaroxaban (women: pooled risk ratio (pRR)=1.34, 95% CI=1.18 to 1.51; men: pRR=0.97, 95% CI=0.85 to 1.10; p value for interaction (p for interaction)<0.001) and possibly dabigatran (women: pRR=1.25, 95% CI=0.92 to 1.70; men: pRR=0.83, 95% CI=0.72 to 0.97; p-for-interaction=0.02). The sex difference in GIB remained for rivaroxaban when a Bonferroni-corrected significance level was used (α=0.003). No sex-specific GIB data for apixaban and edoxaban was available for the meta-analysis. Conclusions For both sexes, DOACs generally demonstrated favourable effectiveness and safety over warfarin. However, observational data suggested that women may have higher GIB risk with rivaroxaban and possibly dabigatran than warfarin. Further studies are warranted to verify our findings and elucidate sex-specific GIB risk with apixaban and edoxaban, of which the data is currently lacking. PROSPERO registration number CRD42022325027.</p>-
dc.languageeng-
dc.publisherBMJ Publishing Group-
dc.relation.ispartofOpen Heart-
dc.rightsThis work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.-
dc.subjectAtrial Fibrillation-
dc.subjectMeta-Analysis-
dc.subjectStroke-
dc.subjectSystematic Reviews as Topic-
dc.titleSex-specific comparative outcomes between oral anticoagulants in patients with atrial fibrillation: a systematic review and meta-analysis-
dc.typeArticle-
dc.description.naturepublished_or_final_version-
dc.identifier.doi10.1136/openhrt-2024-002792-
dc.identifier.scopuseid_2-s2.0-85199450678-
dc.identifier.volume11-
dc.identifier.issue2-
dc.identifier.eissn2053-3624-
dc.identifier.issnl2053-3624-

Export via OAI-PMH Interface in XML Formats


OR


Export to Other Non-XML Formats