File Download

There are no files associated with this item.

  Links for fulltext
     (May Require Subscription)
Supplementary

Article: Assessment and Diagnostic Standards of Apraxia of Speech in Chinese-Speaking Adults and Children: A Scoping Review

TitleAssessment and Diagnostic Standards of Apraxia of Speech in Chinese-Speaking Adults and Children: A Scoping Review
Authors
Issue Date2023
Citation
American Journal of Speech-Language Pathology, 2023, v. 32, n. 1, p. 316-340 How to Cite?
AbstractPurpose: Apraxia of speech (AOS) and childhood apraxia of speech (CAS) are motor-based speech disorders that have been well studied in Indo-European languages. There is limited understanding of these disorders in speakers of Sino-Tibetan languages, such as Chinese. The purpose of this study is to review methods used in research studies for the assessment and diagnosis of AOS and CAS in Chinese speakers. Method: This scoping review followed the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses Extension for Scoping Reviews guidelines. Articles with a focus on AOS or CAS in Chinese speakers were systematically searched in seven English and six Chinese databases. Three reviewers per-formed independent screening, data extraction, and quality assessment after obtaining 100% agreement on the prescreening exercise. A qualitative analysis was conducted to rate the quality of diagnoses, ranging from high (Level I) to low (Level III), with Level IV assigned to studies for which the appropriate rating was unclear due to insufficient evidence. Results: Twenty-eight AOS articles and five CAS articles were identified. A vari-ety of assessment and diagnostic methods were reported. No study of Chinese speakers with AOS or CAS received a rating of Level I. The highest level achieved was Level IIIa for both AOS and CAS studies. Conclusions: There is no reliable and valid test or method for the diagnosis of AOS or CAS in Chinese speakers. The current gold standard of diagnosis is based upon expert perceptual judgment. Further single-language and cross-linguistic investigations of AOS and CAS and the future development of assessment and diagnostic methods are recommended.
Persistent Identifierhttp://hdl.handle.net/10722/346959
ISSN
2023 Impact Factor: 2.3
2023 SCImago Journal Rankings: 0.923

 

DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorWong, Eddy Chun Ho-
dc.contributor.authorWong, Min Ney-
dc.contributor.authorVelleman, Shelley L.-
dc.date.accessioned2024-09-17T04:14:26Z-
dc.date.available2024-09-17T04:14:26Z-
dc.date.issued2023-
dc.identifier.citationAmerican Journal of Speech-Language Pathology, 2023, v. 32, n. 1, p. 316-340-
dc.identifier.issn1058-0360-
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10722/346959-
dc.description.abstractPurpose: Apraxia of speech (AOS) and childhood apraxia of speech (CAS) are motor-based speech disorders that have been well studied in Indo-European languages. There is limited understanding of these disorders in speakers of Sino-Tibetan languages, such as Chinese. The purpose of this study is to review methods used in research studies for the assessment and diagnosis of AOS and CAS in Chinese speakers. Method: This scoping review followed the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses Extension for Scoping Reviews guidelines. Articles with a focus on AOS or CAS in Chinese speakers were systematically searched in seven English and six Chinese databases. Three reviewers per-formed independent screening, data extraction, and quality assessment after obtaining 100% agreement on the prescreening exercise. A qualitative analysis was conducted to rate the quality of diagnoses, ranging from high (Level I) to low (Level III), with Level IV assigned to studies for which the appropriate rating was unclear due to insufficient evidence. Results: Twenty-eight AOS articles and five CAS articles were identified. A vari-ety of assessment and diagnostic methods were reported. No study of Chinese speakers with AOS or CAS received a rating of Level I. The highest level achieved was Level IIIa for both AOS and CAS studies. Conclusions: There is no reliable and valid test or method for the diagnosis of AOS or CAS in Chinese speakers. The current gold standard of diagnosis is based upon expert perceptual judgment. Further single-language and cross-linguistic investigations of AOS and CAS and the future development of assessment and diagnostic methods are recommended.-
dc.languageeng-
dc.relation.ispartofAmerican Journal of Speech-Language Pathology-
dc.titleAssessment and Diagnostic Standards of Apraxia of Speech in Chinese-Speaking Adults and Children: A Scoping Review-
dc.typeArticle-
dc.description.naturelink_to_subscribed_fulltext-
dc.identifier.doi10.1044/2022_AJSLP-21-00355-
dc.identifier.pmid36378894-
dc.identifier.scopuseid_2-s2.0-85146193448-
dc.identifier.volume32-
dc.identifier.issue1-
dc.identifier.spage316-
dc.identifier.epage340-
dc.identifier.eissn1558-9110-

Export via OAI-PMH Interface in XML Formats


OR


Export to Other Non-XML Formats