File Download

There are no files associated with this item.

Supplementary

Conference Paper: Trend, Cycle and Expectation Formation

TitleTrend, Cycle and Expectation Formation
Authors
Issue Date28-Jun-2024
Abstract

Using the survey of professional forecasters, we document two facts that contradict the standard assumption of stationary state variables in the expectation formation literature: (i) changes in trend beliefs are negatively correlated with changes in cyclical beliefs; (ii) forecast dispersion increases as the forecast horizon lengthens. To organize these facts, we propose an otherwise standard forecasting model with stochastic trends. In this model, forecasters have imperfect information and cannot perfectly differentiate between trends and cycles. This information friction leads to persistent forecasting errors or rational confusion about both components. Furthermore, we show that this information friction may underlie changes in forecasting behaviors following the implementation of explicit inflation targeting in 2012. In an extension of this framework, we examine how be- havioral biases can amplify the impact of such confusion.


Persistent Identifierhttp://hdl.handle.net/10722/348154

 

DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorLiu, Yicheng-
dc.contributor.authorChen, Heng-
dc.date.accessioned2024-10-05T00:30:53Z-
dc.date.available2024-10-05T00:30:53Z-
dc.date.issued2024-06-28-
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10722/348154-
dc.description.abstract<p>Using the survey of professional forecasters, we document two facts that contradict the standard assumption of stationary state variables in the expectation formation literature: (i) changes in trend beliefs are negatively correlated with changes in cyclical beliefs; (ii) forecast dispersion increases as the forecast horizon lengthens. To organize these facts, we propose an otherwise standard forecasting model with stochastic trends. In this model, forecasters have imperfect information and cannot perfectly differentiate between trends and cycles. This information friction leads to persistent forecasting errors or rational confusion about both components. Furthermore, we show that this information friction may underlie changes in forecasting behaviors following the implementation of explicit inflation targeting in 2012. In an extension of this framework, we examine how be- havioral biases can amplify the impact of such confusion.<br></p>-
dc.languageeng-
dc.relation.ispartofAsian Meeting of the Econometric Society (28/06/2024-30/06/2024, Hangzhou)-
dc.titleTrend, Cycle and Expectation Formation-
dc.typeConference_Paper-

Export via OAI-PMH Interface in XML Formats


OR


Export to Other Non-XML Formats