File Download

There are no files associated with this item.

  Links for fulltext
     (May Require Subscription)
Supplementary

Article: The Chinese idea of a university in flux: academic freedom and institutional autonomy under entrepreneurial reforms in the GBA

TitleThe Chinese idea of a university in flux: academic freedom and institutional autonomy under entrepreneurial reforms in the GBA
Authors
Issue Date16-Oct-2024
PublisherTaylor and Francis Group
Citation
Studies in Higher Education, 2024, p. 1-18 How to Cite?
Abstract

The complexity of the idea of a university has been intensified globally as more universities pursue entrepreneurship. For modern universities in China as latecomers, contemporary entrepreneurial reforms are implemented against a backdrop of ongoing interactions between Chinese and Western ideas of a university, with the Western established as the formal system and the Chinese functioning informally yet powerfully. Through 71 semi-structured interviews at four universities in the Guangdong-Hong Kong-Macao Greater Bay Area, this study explores how academic freedom and institutional autonomy are perceived by Chinese academics under entrepreneurial reforms. The study has two major findings through Clark’s analytical framework of academic, government, and market forces: (1) A novel form of statist academic freedom is emerging, merging traditional Chinese scholarly values with state-driven entrepreneurial demands; (2) The adapted triple helix model in China emphasises competition and excellence, shaped by a unique blend of state influence and market dynamics. It offers a nuanced perspective on academic freedom and institutional autonomy amidst entrepreneurial reforms in China, highlighting a compatibility with Chinese idea of a university and a response to global entrepreneurial pressures.


Persistent Identifierhttp://hdl.handle.net/10722/350165
ISSN
2023 Impact Factor: 3.7
2023 SCImago Journal Rankings: 1.614

 

DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorZhu, Junhua-
dc.contributor.authorYang, Rui-
dc.date.accessioned2024-10-21T03:56:34Z-
dc.date.available2024-10-21T03:56:34Z-
dc.date.issued2024-10-16-
dc.identifier.citationStudies in Higher Education, 2024, p. 1-18-
dc.identifier.issn0307-5079-
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10722/350165-
dc.description.abstract<p>The complexity of the idea of a university has been intensified globally as more universities pursue entrepreneurship. For modern universities in China as latecomers, contemporary entrepreneurial reforms are implemented against a backdrop of ongoing interactions between Chinese and Western ideas of a university, with the Western established as the formal system and the Chinese functioning informally yet powerfully. Through 71 semi-structured interviews at four universities in the Guangdong-Hong Kong-Macao Greater Bay Area, this study explores how academic freedom and institutional autonomy are perceived by Chinese academics under entrepreneurial reforms. The study has two major findings through Clark’s analytical framework of academic, government, and market forces: (1) A novel form of statist academic freedom is emerging, merging traditional Chinese scholarly values with state-driven entrepreneurial demands; (2) The adapted <em>triple helix</em> model in China emphasises competition and excellence, shaped by a unique blend of state influence and market dynamics. It offers a nuanced perspective on academic freedom and institutional autonomy amidst entrepreneurial reforms in China, highlighting a compatibility with Chinese idea of a university and a response to global entrepreneurial pressures.<br></p>-
dc.languageeng-
dc.publisherTaylor and Francis Group-
dc.relation.ispartofStudies in Higher Education-
dc.rightsThis work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.-
dc.titleThe Chinese idea of a university in flux: academic freedom and institutional autonomy under entrepreneurial reforms in the GBA-
dc.typeArticle-
dc.identifier.doi10.1080/03075079.2024.2415381-
dc.identifier.spage1-
dc.identifier.epage18-
dc.identifier.eissn1470-174X-
dc.identifier.issnl0307-5079-

Export via OAI-PMH Interface in XML Formats


OR


Export to Other Non-XML Formats