File Download
There are no files associated with this item.
Links for fulltext
(May Require Subscription)
- Publisher Website: 10.1016/j.artint.2024.104177
- Scopus: eid_2-s2.0-85198752629
- WOS: WOS:001274569900001
- Find via

Supplementary
- Citations:
- Appears in Collections:
Article: Class fairness in online matching
| Title | Class fairness in online matching |
|---|---|
| Authors | |
| Keywords | Fair division Matching Online algorithms Social welfare |
| Issue Date | 1-Oct-2024 |
| Publisher | Elsevier |
| Citation | Artificial Intelligence, 2024, v. 335 How to Cite? |
| Abstract | We initiate the study of fairness among classes of agents in online bipartite matching where there is a given set of offline vertices (aka agents) and another set of vertices (aka items) that arrive online and must be matched irrevocably upon arrival. In this setting, agents are partitioned into classes and the matching is required to be fair with respect to the classes. We adapt popular fairness notions (e.g. envy-freeness, proportionality, and maximin share) and their relaxations to this setting and study deterministic algorithms for matching indivisible items (leading to integral matchings) and for matching divisible items (leading to fractional matchings). For matching indivisible items, we propose an adaptive-priority-based algorithm, MATCH-AND-SHIFT, prove that it achieves [Formula presented]-approximation of both class envy-freeness up to one item and class maximin share fairness, and show that each guarantee is tight. For matching divisible items, we design a water-filling-based algorithm, EQUAL-FILLING, that achieves [Formula presented]-approximation of class envy-freeness and class proportionality; we prove [Formula presented] to be tight for class proportionality and establish a [Formula presented] upper bound on class envy-freeness. Finally, we discuss several challenges in designing randomized algorithms that achieve reasonable fairness approximation ratios. Nonetheless, we build upon EQUAL-FILLING to design a randomized algorithm for matching indivisible items, EQUAL-FILLING-OCS, which achieves 0.593-approximation of class proportionality. |
| Persistent Identifier | http://hdl.handle.net/10722/350183 |
| ISSN | 2023 Impact Factor: 5.1 2023 SCImago Journal Rankings: 2.042 |
| ISI Accession Number ID |
| DC Field | Value | Language |
|---|---|---|
| dc.contributor.author | Hosseini, Hadi | - |
| dc.contributor.author | Huang, Zhiyi | - |
| dc.contributor.author | Igarashi, Ayumi | - |
| dc.contributor.author | Shah, Nisarg | - |
| dc.date.accessioned | 2024-10-21T03:56:42Z | - |
| dc.date.available | 2024-10-21T03:56:42Z | - |
| dc.date.issued | 2024-10-01 | - |
| dc.identifier.citation | Artificial Intelligence, 2024, v. 335 | - |
| dc.identifier.issn | 0004-3702 | - |
| dc.identifier.uri | http://hdl.handle.net/10722/350183 | - |
| dc.description.abstract | <p>We initiate the study of fairness among classes of agents in online bipartite matching where there is a given set of offline vertices (aka agents) and another set of vertices (aka items) that arrive online and must be matched irrevocably upon arrival. In this setting, agents are partitioned into classes and the matching is required to be fair with respect to the classes. We adapt popular fairness notions (e.g. envy-freeness, proportionality, and maximin share) and their relaxations to this setting and study deterministic algorithms for matching indivisible items (leading to integral matchings) and for matching divisible items (leading to fractional matchings). For matching indivisible items, we propose an adaptive-priority-based algorithm, MATCH-AND-SHIFT, prove that it achieves [Formula presented]-approximation of both class envy-freeness up to one item and class maximin share fairness, and show that each guarantee is tight. For matching divisible items, we design a water-filling-based algorithm, EQUAL-FILLING, that achieves [Formula presented]-approximation of class envy-freeness and class proportionality; we prove [Formula presented] to be tight for class proportionality and establish a [Formula presented] upper bound on class envy-freeness. Finally, we discuss several challenges in designing randomized algorithms that achieve reasonable fairness approximation ratios. Nonetheless, we build upon EQUAL-FILLING to design a randomized algorithm for matching indivisible items, EQUAL-FILLING-OCS, which achieves 0.593-approximation of class proportionality.</p> | - |
| dc.language | eng | - |
| dc.publisher | Elsevier | - |
| dc.relation.ispartof | Artificial Intelligence | - |
| dc.subject | Fair division | - |
| dc.subject | Matching | - |
| dc.subject | Online algorithms | - |
| dc.subject | Social welfare | - |
| dc.title | Class fairness in online matching | - |
| dc.type | Article | - |
| dc.identifier.doi | 10.1016/j.artint.2024.104177 | - |
| dc.identifier.scopus | eid_2-s2.0-85198752629 | - |
| dc.identifier.volume | 335 | - |
| dc.identifier.eissn | 1872-7921 | - |
| dc.identifier.isi | WOS:001274569900001 | - |
| dc.identifier.issnl | 0004-3702 | - |
