File Download
There are no files associated with this item.
Links for fulltext
(May Require Subscription)
- Publisher Website: 10.1080/03075079.2024.2407051
- Scopus: eid_2-s2.0-85204770321
- Find via
Supplementary
-
Citations:
- Scopus: 0
- Appears in Collections:
Article: Integrating traditional knowledge of non-Western humanities and social sciences: a research agenda through the Chinese lens
Title | Integrating traditional knowledge of non-Western humanities and social sciences: a research agenda through the Chinese lens |
---|---|
Authors | |
Keywords | higher education humanities and social sciences knowledge integration research agenda Traditional Chinese knowledge |
Issue Date | 25-Sep-2024 |
Publisher | Taylor and Francis Group |
Citation | Studies in Higher Education, 2024 How to Cite? |
Abstract | The global knowledge asymmetries, dominated by academic centers in Western societies, have marginalized traditional non-Western knowledge. In line with the call for intellectual pluriversality, non-Western scholars in the humanities and social sciences (HSS) have witnessed a revitalization of traditional knowledge in research. Nonetheless, how they integrate their traditional knowledge into research lacks theoretical grounding and empirical substantiation. This study specifically examines the research agenda of contemporary Chinese HSS academics who are attempting to integrate traditional Chinese and modern Western knowledge. Through interviews, it seeks to understand their reasons, goals, principles, and strategies related to such knowledge integration. It first underscores the rationales stemming from global knowledge disparities and Chinese individuals’ limited exposure to their traditional knowledge. It then reveals guiding principles for understanding traditional Chinese knowledge. Last, it provides strategies for knowledge integration, including comparative analysis and the transformation of traditional Chinese knowledge into modern theories and methodologies. Such a research agenda transcends critical reflection on the hegemonic and inequitable global knowledge system, promoting tangible actions to facilitate HSS research in China and beyond. |
Persistent Identifier | http://hdl.handle.net/10722/350196 |
ISSN | 2023 Impact Factor: 3.7 2023 SCImago Journal Rankings: 1.614 |
DC Field | Value | Language |
---|---|---|
dc.contributor.author | Shen, Yuting | - |
dc.contributor.author | Zhu, Yanzhen | - |
dc.contributor.author | Yang, Rui | - |
dc.date.accessioned | 2024-10-21T03:56:47Z | - |
dc.date.available | 2024-10-21T03:56:47Z | - |
dc.date.issued | 2024-09-25 | - |
dc.identifier.citation | Studies in Higher Education, 2024 | - |
dc.identifier.issn | 0307-5079 | - |
dc.identifier.uri | http://hdl.handle.net/10722/350196 | - |
dc.description.abstract | <p>The global knowledge asymmetries, dominated by academic centers in Western societies, have marginalized traditional non-Western knowledge. In line with the call for intellectual pluriversality, non-Western scholars in the humanities and social sciences (HSS) have witnessed a revitalization of traditional knowledge in research. Nonetheless, how they integrate their traditional knowledge into research lacks theoretical grounding and empirical substantiation. This study specifically examines the research agenda of contemporary Chinese HSS academics who are attempting to integrate traditional Chinese and modern Western knowledge. Through interviews, it seeks to understand their reasons, goals, principles, and strategies related to such knowledge integration. It first underscores the rationales stemming from global knowledge disparities and Chinese individuals’ limited exposure to their traditional knowledge. It then reveals guiding principles for understanding traditional Chinese knowledge. Last, it provides strategies for knowledge integration, including comparative analysis and the transformation of traditional Chinese knowledge into modern theories and methodologies. Such a research agenda transcends critical reflection on the hegemonic and inequitable global knowledge system, promoting tangible actions to facilitate HSS research in China and beyond.<br></p> | - |
dc.language | eng | - |
dc.publisher | Taylor and Francis Group | - |
dc.relation.ispartof | Studies in Higher Education | - |
dc.rights | This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License. | - |
dc.subject | higher education | - |
dc.subject | humanities and social sciences | - |
dc.subject | knowledge integration | - |
dc.subject | research agenda | - |
dc.subject | Traditional Chinese knowledge | - |
dc.title | Integrating traditional knowledge of non-Western humanities and social sciences: a research agenda through the Chinese lens | - |
dc.type | Article | - |
dc.identifier.doi | 10.1080/03075079.2024.2407051 | - |
dc.identifier.scopus | eid_2-s2.0-85204770321 | - |
dc.identifier.eissn | 1470-174X | - |
dc.identifier.issnl | 0307-5079 | - |