File Download

There are no files associated with this item.

  Links for fulltext
     (May Require Subscription)
Supplementary

Article: Mobile phone-based smoking-cessation intervention in patients with chronic diseases in China: a Sequential Multiple Assignment Randomized Trial (SMART)

TitleMobile phone-based smoking-cessation intervention in patients with chronic diseases in China: a Sequential Multiple Assignment Randomized Trial (SMART)
Authors
Issue Date26-Sep-2024
PublisherOxford University Press
Citation
Nicotine & Tobacco Research, 2024 How to Cite?
Abstract

Introduction: Mobile phone-based interventions show promise for smoking cessation but often face low engagement. This study assessed the feasibility and preliminary effectiveness of a 2-phase, multi-component mobile phone-based smoking cessation intervention for patients with chronic diseases.

Methods: This Sequential Multiple Assignment Randomized Trial (SMART) recruited smokers with chronic diseases from hospitals in Zhuhai, China. Participants received brief cessation advice and were randomized to personalized chat support (PCS, n=64) or group chat support (GCS, n=64) for 1 month. At 1-month, PCS non-responders (continuing smokers) were re-randomized to receive either multi-component optional support (MOS) or continued PCS for 2 months. GCS non-responders were re-randomized to receive PCS or continued GCS. Responders continued with their initial intervention for 2 months. Feasibility outcomes included eligibility, participation, retention, intervention engagement, and satisfaction. Preliminary effectiveness was assessed by abstinence rates among non-responders.

Results: Of 160 screened, 128 (all male, 46.1% aged≤39 years) participated. At 1-month, 51 and 53 non-responded to PCS and GCS, respectively. Of them, 26 were re-randomized to receive PCS-MOS and 26 to receive GCS-PCS. At 6-month, PCS-MOS showed a non-significant higher validated abstinence rate compared to PCS alone (11.5% vs. 4.2%, odds ratio [OR] 3.13, 95%CI 0.30-32.31, P=0.34), GCS-PCS showed a non-significant lower validated abstinence rate compared to GCS (0% vs. 11.1%, OR 0.50, 95%CI 0.15-1.67, P=0.26).

Conclusions: This trial showed the feasibility of leveraging hospital visits as teachable opportunities and integrating mobile phone-based smoking cessation support into chronic disease management in China. Optional treatments alongside mobile support showed preliminary effectiveness.


Persistent Identifierhttp://hdl.handle.net/10722/351125
ISSN
2023 Impact Factor: 3.0
2023 SCImago Journal Rankings: 1.378

 

DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorXue, Weng-
dc.contributor.authorSong, Chuyu-
dc.contributor.authorLiu, Kefeng-
dc.contributor.authorZhao, Shengzhi-
dc.contributor.authorYang, Hongcui-
dc.contributor.authorWang, Man Ping-
dc.date.accessioned2024-11-10T00:30:17Z-
dc.date.available2024-11-10T00:30:17Z-
dc.date.issued2024-09-26-
dc.identifier.citationNicotine & Tobacco Research, 2024-
dc.identifier.issn1462-2203-
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10722/351125-
dc.description.abstract<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Mobile phone-based interventions show promise for smoking cessation but often face low engagement. This study assessed the feasibility and preliminary effectiveness of a 2-phase, multi-component mobile phone-based smoking cessation intervention for patients with chronic diseases.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This Sequential Multiple Assignment Randomized Trial (SMART) recruited smokers with chronic diseases from hospitals in Zhuhai, China. Participants received brief cessation advice and were randomized to personalized chat support (PCS, n=64) or group chat support (GCS, n=64) for 1 month. At 1-month, PCS non-responders (continuing smokers) were re-randomized to receive either multi-component optional support (MOS) or continued PCS for 2 months. GCS non-responders were re-randomized to receive PCS or continued GCS. Responders continued with their initial intervention for 2 months. Feasibility outcomes included eligibility, participation, retention, intervention engagement, and satisfaction. Preliminary effectiveness was assessed by abstinence rates among non-responders.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Of 160 screened, 128 (all male, 46.1% aged≤39 years) participated. At 1-month, 51 and 53 non-responded to PCS and GCS, respectively. Of them, 26 were re-randomized to receive PCS-MOS and 26 to receive GCS-PCS. At 6-month, PCS-MOS showed a non-significant higher validated abstinence rate compared to PCS alone (11.5% vs. 4.2%, odds ratio [OR] 3.13, 95%CI 0.30-32.31, P=0.34), GCS-PCS showed a non-significant lower validated abstinence rate compared to GCS (0% vs. 11.1%, OR 0.50, 95%CI 0.15-1.67, P=0.26).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>This trial showed the feasibility of leveraging hospital visits as teachable opportunities and integrating mobile phone-based smoking cessation support into chronic disease management in China. Optional treatments alongside mobile support showed preliminary effectiveness.</p>-
dc.languageeng-
dc.publisherOxford University Press-
dc.relation.ispartofNicotine & Tobacco Research-
dc.rightsThis work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.-
dc.titleMobile phone-based smoking-cessation intervention in patients with chronic diseases in China: a Sequential Multiple Assignment Randomized Trial (SMART)-
dc.typeArticle-
dc.identifier.doi10.1093/ntr/ntae230-
dc.identifier.eissn1469-994X-
dc.identifier.issnl1462-2203-

Export via OAI-PMH Interface in XML Formats


OR


Export to Other Non-XML Formats