File Download

There are no files associated with this item.

  Links for fulltext
     (May Require Subscription)
Supplementary

Article: Sugar substitutes on caries prevention in permanent teeth among children and adolescents: a systematic review and meta-analysis

TitleSugar substitutes on caries prevention in permanent teeth among children and adolescents: a systematic review and meta-analysis
Authors
KeywordsChild
Dental caries
Oral health
Prevention
Sugar substitute
Sweetener
Issue Date1-Jul-2024
PublisherElsevier
Citation
Journal of Dentistry, 2024, v. 146 How to Cite?
Abstract

Objectives: This study aimed to systematically review the effect of sugar substitute consumption on caries prevention in permanent teeth among children and adolescents. Data: Randomized controlled trials (RCTs) and controlled clinical trials (CCTs) comparing the clinical effect of sugar substitutes (both high- and low-intensity sweeteners) in preventing caries in permanent teeth among children and adolescents aged 6–19 were included. Sources: A systematic search was conducted in three databases (PubMed, Web of Science and Embase) without any restrictions on publication year. Study selection: The initial search found 1,859 items, and finally, 15 studies (11 RCTs and 4 CCTs) with a total of 6325 participants (age: 6–18 years) were included. The Cochrane risk-of-bias assessment tools were used for quality assessment. Most (80%, 12/15) were graded as having a ‘moderate’ or ‘high’ risk of bias. All trials investigated sugar alcohol, which is a low-intensity sweetener. Xylitol was the most commonly investigated (73.3%, 11/15), followed by sorbitol (46.7%, 7/15), and erythritol (13.3%, 2/15). Results of the meta-analysis showed that both xylitol (standardized mean difference [SMD]: -0.50, 95% confidence interval [CI] -0.85 to -0.16, P = 0.005) and sorbitol (SMD: -0.10, 95% CI: -0.19 to -0.01, P = 0.03) had a significant effect in preventing dental caries compared to no treatment/placebo. No clinical trials on high-intensity sweeteners such as aspartame and saccharin were found. Conclusion: The consumption of xylitol or sorbitol is potentially effective in preventing caries in permanent teeth among children and adolescents. No clinical evidence is available regarding the role of high-intensity sweeteners in caries prevention. Clinical significance: The use of xylitol or sorbitol as sugar substitutes has a beneficial effect in preventing dental caries among children and adolescents.


Persistent Identifierhttp://hdl.handle.net/10722/354545
ISSN
2023 Impact Factor: 4.8
2023 SCImago Journal Rankings: 1.313
ISI Accession Number ID

 

DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorLuo, Bella Weijia-
dc.contributor.authorLiang, Nicky Linlin-
dc.contributor.authorTownsend, Janice A.-
dc.contributor.authorLo, Edward Chin Man-
dc.contributor.authorChu, Chun Hung-
dc.contributor.authorDuangthip, Duangporn-
dc.date.accessioned2025-02-13T00:35:15Z-
dc.date.available2025-02-13T00:35:15Z-
dc.date.issued2024-07-01-
dc.identifier.citationJournal of Dentistry, 2024, v. 146-
dc.identifier.issn0300-5712-
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10722/354545-
dc.description.abstract<p>Objectives: This study aimed to systematically review the effect of sugar substitute consumption on caries prevention in permanent teeth among children and adolescents. Data: Randomized controlled trials (RCTs) and controlled clinical trials (CCTs) comparing the clinical effect of sugar substitutes (both high- and low-intensity sweeteners) in preventing caries in permanent teeth among children and adolescents aged 6–19 were included. Sources: A systematic search was conducted in three databases (PubMed, Web of Science and Embase) without any restrictions on publication year. Study selection: The initial search found 1,859 items, and finally, 15 studies (11 RCTs and 4 CCTs) with a total of 6325 participants (age: 6–18 years) were included. The Cochrane risk-of-bias assessment tools were used for quality assessment. Most (80%, 12/15) were graded as having a ‘moderate’ or ‘high’ risk of bias. All trials investigated sugar alcohol, which is a low-intensity sweetener. Xylitol was the most commonly investigated (73.3%, 11/15), followed by sorbitol (46.7%, 7/15), and erythritol (13.3%, 2/15). Results of the meta-analysis showed that both xylitol (standardized mean difference [SMD]: -0.50, 95% confidence interval [CI] -0.85 to -0.16, P = 0.005) and sorbitol (SMD: -0.10, 95% CI: -0.19 to -0.01, P = 0.03) had a significant effect in preventing dental caries compared to no treatment/placebo. No clinical trials on high-intensity sweeteners such as aspartame and saccharin were found. Conclusion: The consumption of xylitol or sorbitol is potentially effective in preventing caries in permanent teeth among children and adolescents. No clinical evidence is available regarding the role of high-intensity sweeteners in caries prevention. Clinical significance: The use of xylitol or sorbitol as sugar substitutes has a beneficial effect in preventing dental caries among children and adolescents.<br></p>-
dc.languageeng-
dc.publisherElsevier-
dc.relation.ispartofJournal of Dentistry-
dc.rightsThis work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.-
dc.subjectChild-
dc.subjectDental caries-
dc.subjectOral health-
dc.subjectPrevention-
dc.subjectSugar substitute-
dc.subjectSweetener-
dc.titleSugar substitutes on caries prevention in permanent teeth among children and adolescents: a systematic review and meta-analysis-
dc.typeArticle-
dc.identifier.doi10.1016/j.jdent.2024.105069-
dc.identifier.scopuseid_2-s2.0-85193952029-
dc.identifier.volume146-
dc.identifier.eissn1879-176X-
dc.identifier.isiWOS:001246626500001-
dc.identifier.issnl0300-5712-

Export via OAI-PMH Interface in XML Formats


OR


Export to Other Non-XML Formats