File Download
There are no files associated with this item.
Links for fulltext
(May Require Subscription)
- Publisher Website: 10.1080/09585192.2024.2442081
- Scopus: eid_2-s2.0-85213567865
- Find via
Supplementary
-
Citations:
- Scopus: 0
- Appears in Collections:
Article: The dual effects of job design on knowledge hiding: expanding job demands–resources theory to employee rational-choice behaviour
Title | The dual effects of job design on knowledge hiding: expanding job demands–resources theory to employee rational-choice behaviour |
---|---|
Authors | |
Keywords | cost-benefit analysis framework within social exchange theory employee motivation theories–self-determination theory and job characteristics model employee rational–choice and (counter)productive behaviour job demands–resources theory Job design knowledge hiding |
Issue Date | 26-Dec-2024 |
Publisher | Taylor and Francis Group |
Citation | The International Journal of Human Resource Management, 2024, v. 36, n. 2, p. 173-205 How to Cite? |
Abstract | Human resource management (HRM) literature often uses motivational theories to examine how job design motivates employees to manage newly established employee behaviours such as knowledge-hiding. However, the literature finds that whereas job-design characteristics reduce knowledge hiding, others unexpectedly encourage it. By integrating the cost-benefit analysis framework into the job demands–resources (JD–R) theory, we examine how job demands and job resources as two distinct types of job-design characteristics influence the expected costs and benefits of sharing solicited knowledge to affect knowledge hiding differently. In summary, we find that job demands encourage knowledge hiding, whereas job resources lower it. We contribute that job-design characteristics act as job demands or resources to affect knowledge hiding differently. Further, we explain the unexpected findings concerning why and how job-design characteristics–as job demands–encourage knowledge hiding by stimulating the expected costs but do not motivate employees to produce the expected benefits. In addition, by integrating the cost-benefit analysis framework into the JD–R theory, we contribute that job demands and resources affect the cost-benefit analyses, influencing employees’ rational choice behaviour. This integration considerably expands the JD–R theory’s application scope from employee well-being and performance to rational choice behaviours. |
Persistent Identifier | http://hdl.handle.net/10722/355160 |
ISSN | 2023 Impact Factor: 4.9 2023 SCImago Journal Rankings: 2.078 |
DC Field | Value | Language |
---|---|---|
dc.contributor.author | Shujahat, Muhammad | - |
dc.contributor.author | Wang, Minhong | - |
dc.contributor.author | Ali, Murad | - |
dc.contributor.author | Zhu, Qinghua | - |
dc.contributor.author | Škerlavaj, Miha | - |
dc.date.accessioned | 2025-03-28T00:35:32Z | - |
dc.date.available | 2025-03-28T00:35:32Z | - |
dc.date.issued | 2024-12-26 | - |
dc.identifier.citation | The International Journal of Human Resource Management, 2024, v. 36, n. 2, p. 173-205 | - |
dc.identifier.issn | 0958-5192 | - |
dc.identifier.uri | http://hdl.handle.net/10722/355160 | - |
dc.description.abstract | <p>Human resource management (HRM) literature often uses motivational theories to examine how job design motivates employees to manage newly established employee behaviours such as knowledge-hiding. However, the literature finds that whereas job-design characteristics reduce knowledge hiding, others unexpectedly encourage it. By integrating the cost-benefit analysis framework into the job demands–resources (JD–R) theory, we examine how job demands and job resources as two distinct types of job-design characteristics influence the expected costs and benefits of sharing solicited knowledge to affect knowledge hiding differently. In summary, we find that job demands encourage knowledge hiding, whereas job resources lower it. We contribute that job-design characteristics act as job demands or resources to affect knowledge hiding differently. Further, we explain the unexpected findings concerning why and how job-design characteristics–as job demands–encourage knowledge hiding by stimulating the expected costs but do not motivate employees to produce the expected benefits. In addition, by integrating the cost-benefit analysis framework into the JD–R theory, we contribute that job demands and resources affect the cost-benefit analyses, influencing employees’ rational choice behaviour. This integration considerably expands the JD–R theory’s application scope from employee well-being and performance to rational choice behaviours.</p> | - |
dc.language | eng | - |
dc.publisher | Taylor and Francis Group | - |
dc.relation.ispartof | The International Journal of Human Resource Management | - |
dc.rights | This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License. | - |
dc.subject | cost-benefit analysis framework within social exchange theory | - |
dc.subject | employee motivation theories–self-determination theory and job characteristics model | - |
dc.subject | employee rational–choice and (counter)productive behaviour | - |
dc.subject | job demands–resources theory | - |
dc.subject | Job design | - |
dc.subject | knowledge hiding | - |
dc.title | The dual effects of job design on knowledge hiding: expanding job demands–resources theory to employee rational-choice behaviour | - |
dc.type | Article | - |
dc.identifier.doi | 10.1080/09585192.2024.2442081 | - |
dc.identifier.scopus | eid_2-s2.0-85213567865 | - |
dc.identifier.volume | 36 | - |
dc.identifier.issue | 2 | - |
dc.identifier.spage | 173 | - |
dc.identifier.epage | 205 | - |
dc.identifier.eissn | 1466-4399 | - |
dc.identifier.issnl | 0958-5192 | - |