File Download

There are no files associated with this item.

  Links for fulltext
     (May Require Subscription)
Supplementary

Article: Asia Pacific Gastroesophageal Cancer Congress (APGCC) 2024 consensus statement on stage 2 and 3 locally advanced gastric and Siewert 3 junctional adenocarcinoma

TitleAsia Pacific Gastroesophageal Cancer Congress (APGCC) 2024 consensus statement on stage 2 and 3 locally advanced gastric and Siewert 3 junctional adenocarcinoma
Authors
KeywordsChemotherapy
Gastrectomy
Gastric cancer surgery
Immunotherapy
Locally advanced gastric adenocarcinoma
Modified Delphi consensus
Issue Date13-Jun-2025
PublisherSpringer
Citation
Journal of Gastroenterology, 2025 How to Cite?
Abstract

Background

While the development in multimodal therapies has helped improve treatment outcomes for patients with locally advanced gastric adenocarcinoma (LAGC), there still exist disparities in opinion with an optimal treatment plan. This consensus hopes to provide clinicians with structured guidelines to aid in the decision-making for treatment options for LAGC.

Methods

The consensus statement was initiated by establishing a taskforce in collaboration with the Asia Pacific Gastroesophageal Cancer Congress (APGCC) and a multidisciplinary expert panel was selected. Clinical questions on LAGC where perceived variance in practice or opinion may exist were formulated. Studies involving patients with Stage 2 or 3 gastric or Siewert 3 junctional cancers with treatment arms of perioperative chemotherapy, neoadjuvant chemotherapy, adjuvant chemotherapy, immunotherapy and surgery were included. A total of two rounds of voting were performed. Consensus was determined to be reached when a single answer or a combination of either “strongly agree/agree” or “strongly disagree/disagree” responses exceeded 75%.

Results

A total of thirteen clinical questions were developed. They were identified through five main categories: Distal LAGC, Proximal LAGC, Deficient mismatch repair tumors, Chemotherapy and Immunotherapy, and Elderly/Unfit patients. After two rounds of voting by our multidisciplinary expert panel, eleven out of a total thirteen clinical questions had reached consensus. No consensus was reached for two clinical questions.

Conclusion

The APGCC consensus statement aims to guide clinicians in the treatment options for LAGC and Siewert 3 junctional cancer and has clarified some of the roles of perioperative chemotherapy and immunotherapy.


Persistent Identifierhttp://hdl.handle.net/10722/357830
ISSN
2023 Impact Factor: 6.9
2023 SCImago Journal Rankings: 2.099
ISI Accession Number ID

 

DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorMasuda, Yoshio-
dc.contributor.authorFong, Kang Ler-
dc.contributor.authorYeo, Danson-
dc.contributor.authorYeo, Charleen-
dc.contributor.authorChue, Koy Min-
dc.contributor.authorAraba, Said Bani-
dc.contributor.authorLim, Chiew Woon-
dc.contributor.authorYeung, Baldwin-
dc.contributor.authorLee, June-
dc.contributor.authorLin, Jinlin-
dc.contributor.authorChia, Claramae-
dc.contributor.authorNg, Matthew-
dc.contributor.authorNg, Kennedy-
dc.contributor.authorSamol, Jens-
dc.contributor.authorChia, Daryl-
dc.contributor.authorTeh, Jun Liang-
dc.contributor.authorSundar, Raghav-
dc.contributor.authorYong, Wei-Peng-
dc.contributor.authorTan, Hon Lyn-
dc.contributor.authorMuro, Kei-
dc.contributor.authorLordick, Florian-
dc.contributor.authorWainburg, Zev-
dc.contributor.authorTan, Bo Chuan-
dc.contributor.authorKim, Guowei-
dc.contributor.authorSuda, Koichi-
dc.contributor.authorLaw, Simon-
dc.contributor.authorSano, Takeshi-
dc.contributor.authorGurunathan, Ramesh-
dc.contributor.authorChiu, Philip-
dc.contributor.authorWoo, Emile-
dc.contributor.authorDuong, Cuong-
dc.contributor.authorYang, Han-Kwang-
dc.contributor.authorLong, Vo Duy-
dc.contributor.authorKim, Hyung Ho-
dc.contributor.authorMahendren, Han Alexander-
dc.contributor.authorLee, Hyuk Joon-
dc.contributor.authorSamarasam, Inian-
dc.contributor.authorGotoda, Takuji-
dc.contributor.authorLiew, Reis-
dc.contributor.authorShabbir, Asim-
dc.contributor.authorAung, Myint Oo-
dc.contributor.authorTerashima, Masanori-
dc.contributor.authorCheong, Edward-
dc.contributor.authorSo, Jimmy-
dc.contributor.authorTan, Jeremy-
dc.date.accessioned2025-07-22T03:15:13Z-
dc.date.available2025-07-22T03:15:13Z-
dc.date.issued2025-06-13-
dc.identifier.citationJournal of Gastroenterology, 2025-
dc.identifier.issn0944-1174-
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10722/357830-
dc.description.abstract<h3>Background</h3><p>While the development in multimodal therapies has helped improve treatment outcomes for patients with locally advanced gastric adenocarcinoma (LAGC), there still exist disparities in opinion with an optimal treatment plan. This consensus hopes to provide clinicians with structured guidelines to aid in the decision-making for treatment options for LAGC.</p><h3>Methods</h3><p>The consensus statement was initiated by establishing a taskforce in collaboration with the Asia Pacific Gastroesophageal Cancer Congress (APGCC) and a multidisciplinary expert panel was selected. Clinical questions on LAGC where perceived variance in practice or opinion may exist were formulated. Studies involving patients with Stage 2 or 3 gastric or Siewert 3 junctional cancers with treatment arms of perioperative chemotherapy, neoadjuvant chemotherapy, adjuvant chemotherapy, immunotherapy and surgery were included. A total of two rounds of voting were performed. Consensus was determined to be reached when a single answer or a combination of either “strongly agree/agree” or “strongly disagree/disagree” responses exceeded 75%.</p><h3>Results</h3><p>A total of thirteen clinical questions were developed. They were identified through five main categories: Distal LAGC, Proximal LAGC, Deficient mismatch repair tumors, Chemotherapy and Immunotherapy, and Elderly/Unfit patients. After two rounds of voting by our multidisciplinary expert panel, eleven out of a total thirteen clinical questions had reached consensus. No consensus was reached for two clinical questions.</p><h3>Conclusion</h3><p>The APGCC consensus statement aims to guide clinicians in the treatment options for LAGC and Siewert 3 junctional cancer and has clarified some of the roles of perioperative chemotherapy and immunotherapy.</p>-
dc.languageeng-
dc.publisherSpringer-
dc.relation.ispartofJournal of Gastroenterology-
dc.rightsThis work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.-
dc.subjectChemotherapy-
dc.subjectGastrectomy-
dc.subjectGastric cancer surgery-
dc.subjectImmunotherapy-
dc.subjectLocally advanced gastric adenocarcinoma-
dc.subjectModified Delphi consensus-
dc.titleAsia Pacific Gastroesophageal Cancer Congress (APGCC) 2024 consensus statement on stage 2 and 3 locally advanced gastric and Siewert 3 junctional adenocarcinoma-
dc.typeArticle-
dc.identifier.doi10.1007/s00535-025-02266-4-
dc.identifier.scopuseid_2-s2.0-105008215466-
dc.identifier.eissn1435-5922-
dc.identifier.isiWOS:001507803700001-
dc.identifier.issnl0944-1174-

Export via OAI-PMH Interface in XML Formats


OR


Export to Other Non-XML Formats