File Download

There are no files associated with this item.

  Links for fulltext
     (May Require Subscription)
Supplementary

Article: Artificial Intelligence in Detecting Periodontal Disease From Intraoral Photographs: A Systematic Review

TitleArtificial Intelligence in Detecting Periodontal Disease From Intraoral Photographs: A Systematic Review
Authors
Issue Date9-Jul-2025
PublisherWiley Open Access
Citation
International Dental Journal, 2025, v. 75, n. 5 How to Cite?
Abstract

This systematic review aims to evaluate the methodological characteristics and clinical performance of artificial intelligence (AI) models in detecting periodontal disease using digital intraoral photographs. This review includes peer-reviewed publications and conference proceedings in English, focusing on clinical studies of human periodontal diseases. Intraoral photographs served as the primary data source, with fluorescent and microscopic dental images excluded. The methodological characteristics and performance metrics of clinical studies reporting on AI models were analysed. Twenty-six studies met the review criteria. Various image acquisition devices were used by the resarchers including professional cameras, intraoral cameras, smartphones, and home-use devices. Ten studies used clinical examinations as reference methods, while 16 used visual examinations. Eight studies involved multiple experts in dataset annotation. Only 9 studies employed multiple intraoral views for their AI models, with the remaining studies focusing solely on the frontal view. Regarding AI tasks, 17 studies used classification, 4 used detection, and 5 used segmentations. Performance metrics varied widely and were assessed at multiple levels. Classification studies showed accuracies ranging from 0.46 to 1.00, detection studies showed accuracies from 0.56 to 0.78, and segmentation studies achieved Intersection over Union (IoU) scores of 0.43 to 0.70. AI models show potential for detecting periodontal disease from intraoral photographs, but their clinical use faces challenges. Future research should focus on improving reporting standards, standardising evaluation metrics, performing external tests, enhancing data quality, and using clinical gold standards as reference methods. Furthermore, efforts should focus on promoting transparency, integrating ethical considerations, minimising misclassification, and advancing the development of explainable and user-friendly AI systems to enhance their clinical applicability and reliability.


Persistent Identifierhttp://hdl.handle.net/10722/357972
ISSN
2023 Impact Factor: 3.2
2023 SCImago Journal Rankings: 0.803
ISI Accession Number ID

 

DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorMao, Kaijing-
dc.contributor.authorThu, Khaing Myat-
dc.contributor.authorHung, Kuo Feng-
dc.contributor.authorYu, Ollie Yiru-
dc.contributor.authorHsung, Richard Tai-Chiu-
dc.contributor.authorLam, Walter Yu-Hang-
dc.date.accessioned2025-07-23T00:31:02Z-
dc.date.available2025-07-23T00:31:02Z-
dc.date.issued2025-07-09-
dc.identifier.citationInternational Dental Journal, 2025, v. 75, n. 5-
dc.identifier.issn0020-6539-
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10722/357972-
dc.description.abstract<p>This systematic review aims to evaluate the methodological characteristics and clinical performance of artificial intelligence (AI) models in detecting periodontal disease using digital intraoral photographs. This review includes peer-reviewed publications and conference proceedings in English, focusing on clinical studies of human periodontal diseases. Intraoral photographs served as the primary data source, with fluorescent and microscopic dental images excluded. The methodological characteristics and performance metrics of clinical studies reporting on AI models were analysed. Twenty-six studies met the review criteria. Various image acquisition devices were used by the resarchers including professional cameras, intraoral cameras, smartphones, and home-use devices. Ten studies used clinical examinations as reference methods, while 16 used visual examinations. Eight studies involved multiple experts in dataset annotation. Only 9 studies employed multiple intraoral views for their AI models, with the remaining studies focusing solely on the frontal view. Regarding AI tasks, 17 studies used classification, 4 used detection, and 5 used segmentations. Performance metrics varied widely and were assessed at multiple levels. Classification studies showed accuracies ranging from 0.46 to 1.00, detection studies showed accuracies from 0.56 to 0.78, and segmentation studies achieved Intersection over Union (IoU) scores of 0.43 to 0.70. AI models show potential for detecting periodontal disease from intraoral photographs, but their clinical use faces challenges. Future research should focus on improving reporting standards, standardising evaluation metrics, performing external tests, enhancing data quality, and using clinical gold standards as reference methods. Furthermore, efforts should focus on promoting transparency, integrating ethical considerations, minimising misclassification, and advancing the development of explainable and user-friendly AI systems to enhance their clinical applicability and reliability.<br></p>-
dc.languageeng-
dc.publisherWiley Open Access-
dc.relation.ispartofInternational Dental Journal-
dc.rightsThis work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.-
dc.titleArtificial Intelligence in Detecting Periodontal Disease From Intraoral Photographs: A Systematic Review-
dc.typeArticle-
dc.identifier.doi10.1016/j.identj.2025.100883-
dc.identifier.volume75-
dc.identifier.issue5-
dc.identifier.eissn1875-595X-
dc.identifier.isiWOS:001532992400001-
dc.identifier.issnl0020-6539-

Export via OAI-PMH Interface in XML Formats


OR


Export to Other Non-XML Formats