File Download
There are no files associated with this item.
Links for fulltext
(May Require Subscription)
- Publisher Website: 10.1007/s10649-016-9699-2
- Scopus: eid_2-s2.0-84964061371
- Find via

Supplementary
-
Citations:
- Scopus: 0
- Appears in Collections:
Article: Turn vs. shape: teachers cope with incompatible perspectives on angle
| Title | Turn vs. shape: teachers cope with incompatible perspectives on angle |
|---|---|
| Authors | |
| Keywords | Angles Intellectual needs Intuitive rules Polygons Scriptwriting Teacher knowledge |
| Issue Date | 2016 |
| Citation | Educational Studies in Mathematics, 2016, v. 93, n. 2, p. 223-243 How to Cite? |
| Abstract | This study is concerned with tensions between the two different perspectives on the concept of angle: angle as a static shape and angle as a dynamic turn. The goal of the study is to explore how teachers cope with these tensions. We analyze scripts of 16 in-service secondary mathematics teachers, which feature a dialogue between a teacher and students around the following statement: “The sum of the exterior angles of a polygon is 360°.” The findings show that while addressing a variety of intellectual needs of their student characters, in many cases, the teachers compromise the mathematical rigour of the concept of angle. |
| Persistent Identifier | http://hdl.handle.net/10722/361337 |
| ISSN | 2023 Impact Factor: 3.4 2023 SCImago Journal Rankings: 1.476 |
| DC Field | Value | Language |
|---|---|---|
| dc.contributor.author | Kontorovich, Igor’ | - |
| dc.contributor.author | Zazkis, Rina | - |
| dc.date.accessioned | 2025-09-16T04:16:14Z | - |
| dc.date.available | 2025-09-16T04:16:14Z | - |
| dc.date.issued | 2016 | - |
| dc.identifier.citation | Educational Studies in Mathematics, 2016, v. 93, n. 2, p. 223-243 | - |
| dc.identifier.issn | 0013-1954 | - |
| dc.identifier.uri | http://hdl.handle.net/10722/361337 | - |
| dc.description.abstract | This study is concerned with tensions between the two different perspectives on the concept of angle: angle as a static shape and angle as a dynamic turn. The goal of the study is to explore how teachers cope with these tensions. We analyze scripts of 16 in-service secondary mathematics teachers, which feature a dialogue between a teacher and students around the following statement: “The sum of the exterior angles of a polygon is 360°.” The findings show that while addressing a variety of intellectual needs of their student characters, in many cases, the teachers compromise the mathematical rigour of the concept of angle. | - |
| dc.language | eng | - |
| dc.relation.ispartof | Educational Studies in Mathematics | - |
| dc.subject | Angles | - |
| dc.subject | Intellectual needs | - |
| dc.subject | Intuitive rules | - |
| dc.subject | Polygons | - |
| dc.subject | Scriptwriting | - |
| dc.subject | Teacher knowledge | - |
| dc.title | Turn vs. shape: teachers cope with incompatible perspectives on angle | - |
| dc.type | Article | - |
| dc.description.nature | link_to_subscribed_fulltext | - |
| dc.identifier.doi | 10.1007/s10649-016-9699-2 | - |
| dc.identifier.scopus | eid_2-s2.0-84964061371 | - |
| dc.identifier.volume | 93 | - |
| dc.identifier.issue | 2 | - |
| dc.identifier.spage | 223 | - |
| dc.identifier.epage | 243 | - |
| dc.identifier.eissn | 1573-0816 | - |
