File Download

There are no files associated with this item.

  Links for fulltext
     (May Require Subscription)
Supplementary

Article: Turn vs. shape: teachers cope with incompatible perspectives on angle

TitleTurn vs. shape: teachers cope with incompatible perspectives on angle
Authors
KeywordsAngles
Intellectual needs
Intuitive rules
Polygons
Scriptwriting
Teacher knowledge
Issue Date2016
Citation
Educational Studies in Mathematics, 2016, v. 93, n. 2, p. 223-243 How to Cite?
AbstractThis study is concerned with tensions between the two different perspectives on the concept of angle: angle as a static shape and angle as a dynamic turn. The goal of the study is to explore how teachers cope with these tensions. We analyze scripts of 16 in-service secondary mathematics teachers, which feature a dialogue between a teacher and students around the following statement: “The sum of the exterior angles of a polygon is 360°.” The findings show that while addressing a variety of intellectual needs of their student characters, in many cases, the teachers compromise the mathematical rigour of the concept of angle.
Persistent Identifierhttp://hdl.handle.net/10722/361337
ISSN
2023 Impact Factor: 3.4
2023 SCImago Journal Rankings: 1.476

 

DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorKontorovich, Igor’-
dc.contributor.authorZazkis, Rina-
dc.date.accessioned2025-09-16T04:16:14Z-
dc.date.available2025-09-16T04:16:14Z-
dc.date.issued2016-
dc.identifier.citationEducational Studies in Mathematics, 2016, v. 93, n. 2, p. 223-243-
dc.identifier.issn0013-1954-
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10722/361337-
dc.description.abstractThis study is concerned with tensions between the two different perspectives on the concept of angle: angle as a static shape and angle as a dynamic turn. The goal of the study is to explore how teachers cope with these tensions. We analyze scripts of 16 in-service secondary mathematics teachers, which feature a dialogue between a teacher and students around the following statement: “The sum of the exterior angles of a polygon is 360°.” The findings show that while addressing a variety of intellectual needs of their student characters, in many cases, the teachers compromise the mathematical rigour of the concept of angle.-
dc.languageeng-
dc.relation.ispartofEducational Studies in Mathematics-
dc.subjectAngles-
dc.subjectIntellectual needs-
dc.subjectIntuitive rules-
dc.subjectPolygons-
dc.subjectScriptwriting-
dc.subjectTeacher knowledge-
dc.titleTurn vs. shape: teachers cope with incompatible perspectives on angle-
dc.typeArticle-
dc.description.naturelink_to_subscribed_fulltext-
dc.identifier.doi10.1007/s10649-016-9699-2-
dc.identifier.scopuseid_2-s2.0-84964061371-
dc.identifier.volume93-
dc.identifier.issue2-
dc.identifier.spage223-
dc.identifier.epage243-
dc.identifier.eissn1573-0816-

Export via OAI-PMH Interface in XML Formats


OR


Export to Other Non-XML Formats