File Download
  Links for fulltext
     (May Require Subscription)
Supplementary

Article: Merging Gradual Typing

TitleMerging Gradual Typing
Authors
KeywordsBidirectional Typing
Gradual Typing
Merge Operator
Type-Directed Semantics
Issue Date8-Oct-2024
PublisherAssociation for Computing Machinery (ACM)
Citation
Proceedings of the ACM on Programming Languages, 2024, v. 8, n. OOPSLA2 How to Cite?
AbstractProgramming language mechanisms with a type-directed semantics are nowadays common and widely used. Such mechanisms include gradual typing, type classes, implicits and intersection types with a merge operator. While sharing common challenges in their design and having complementary strengths, type-directed mechanisms have been mostly independently studied. This paper studies a new calculus, called λM★, which combines two type-directed mechanisms: gradual typing and a merge operator based on intersection types. Gradual typing enables a smooth transition between dynamically and statically typed code, and is available in languages such as TypeScript or Flow. The merge operator generalizes record concatenation to allow merges of values of any two types. Recent work has shown that the merge operator enables modelling expressive OOP features like first-class traits/classes and dynamic inheritance with static type-checking. These features are not found in mainstream statically typed OOP languages, but they can be found in dynamically or gradually typed languages such as JavaScript or TypeScript. In λM★, by exploiting the complementary strengths of gradual typing and the merge operator, we obtain a foundation for modelling gradually typed languages with both first-class classes and dynamic inheritance. We study a static variant of λM★ (called λM); prove the type-soundness of λM★; show that λM★ can encode gradual rows and all well-typed terms in the GT FL≲ calculus; and show that λM★ satisfies gradual typing criteria. The dynamic gradual guarantee (DGG) is challenging due to the possibility of ambiguity errors. We establish a variant of the DGG using a semantic notion of precision based on a step-indexed logical relation.
Persistent Identifierhttp://hdl.handle.net/10722/361885
ISSN
2023 Impact Factor: 2.2
2023 SCImago Journal Rankings: 1.242

 

DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorYe, Wenjia-
dc.contributor.authorDos Santos Oliveira, Bruno Cesar-
dc.contributor.authorToro, Matías-
dc.date.accessioned2025-09-17T00:31:35Z-
dc.date.available2025-09-17T00:31:35Z-
dc.date.issued2024-10-08-
dc.identifier.citationProceedings of the ACM on Programming Languages, 2024, v. 8, n. OOPSLA2-
dc.identifier.issn2475-1421-
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10722/361885-
dc.description.abstractProgramming language mechanisms with a type-directed semantics are nowadays common and widely used. Such mechanisms include gradual typing, type classes, implicits and intersection types with a merge operator. While sharing common challenges in their design and having complementary strengths, type-directed mechanisms have been mostly independently studied. This paper studies a new calculus, called λM★, which combines two type-directed mechanisms: gradual typing and a merge operator based on intersection types. Gradual typing enables a smooth transition between dynamically and statically typed code, and is available in languages such as TypeScript or Flow. The merge operator generalizes record concatenation to allow merges of values of any two types. Recent work has shown that the merge operator enables modelling expressive OOP features like first-class traits/classes and dynamic inheritance with static type-checking. These features are not found in mainstream statically typed OOP languages, but they can be found in dynamically or gradually typed languages such as JavaScript or TypeScript. In λM★, by exploiting the complementary strengths of gradual typing and the merge operator, we obtain a foundation for modelling gradually typed languages with both first-class classes and dynamic inheritance. We study a static variant of λM★ (called λM); prove the type-soundness of λM★; show that λM★ can encode gradual rows and all well-typed terms in the GT FL≲ calculus; and show that λM★ satisfies gradual typing criteria. The dynamic gradual guarantee (DGG) is challenging due to the possibility of ambiguity errors. We establish a variant of the DGG using a semantic notion of precision based on a step-indexed logical relation.-
dc.languageeng-
dc.publisherAssociation for Computing Machinery (ACM)-
dc.relation.ispartofProceedings of the ACM on Programming Languages-
dc.rightsThis work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.-
dc.subjectBidirectional Typing-
dc.subjectGradual Typing-
dc.subjectMerge Operator-
dc.subjectType-Directed Semantics-
dc.titleMerging Gradual Typing-
dc.typeArticle-
dc.description.naturepublished_or_final_version-
dc.identifier.doi10.1145/3689734-
dc.identifier.scopuseid_2-s2.0-85207660076-
dc.identifier.volume8-
dc.identifier.issueOOPSLA2-
dc.identifier.eissn2475-1421-
dc.identifier.issnl2475-1421-

Export via OAI-PMH Interface in XML Formats


OR


Export to Other Non-XML Formats