File Download

There are no files associated with this item.

  Links for fulltext
     (May Require Subscription)

Article: Comparative effect of aspirin versus clopidogrel monotherapy on incident type 2 diabetes in patients with atherosclerotic cardiovascular diseases: A target trial emulation study

TitleComparative effect of aspirin versus clopidogrel monotherapy on incident type 2 diabetes in patients with atherosclerotic cardiovascular diseases: A target trial emulation study
Authors
KeywordsAspirin
Atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease
Target trial emulation
Type 2 diabetes
Issue Date1-Apr-2025
PublisherElsevier
Citation
Diabetes Research and Clinical Practice, 2025, v. 222 How to Cite?
Abstract

Aims: To compare the effects of low-dose aspirin and clopidogrel on the risk of incident type 2 diabetes among patients with ASCVD. Methods: This target trial emulation study was performed using the IQVIA Medical Research Data UK primary care database, including adults with an incident first ASCVD event who initiated low-dose aspirin or clopidogrel between 2004 and 2021. We applied an overlap weighting approach to balance treatment groups. The observational analogues of intention-to-treat and per-protocol effects were estimated using pooled logistic regression. Results: A total of 111,292 ASCVD patients who initiated aspirin (n = 78,012) or clopidogrel (n = 33,280) were included. In intention-to-treat analyses, aspirin and clopidogrel had similar risks of diabetes (Hazard ratio [HR] 1.02, 95 % Confidence interval [CI] 0.96 to 1.07), cardiovascular events (1.00, 0.95 to 1.05), and bleeding events (1.02, 0.97 to 1.08). In per-protocol analyses, risks remained comparable for diabetes (1.06, 0.97 to 1.15), cardiovascular events (0.96, 0.89 to 1.03), and bleeding events (1.01, 0.92 to 1.10). Conclusions: Aspirin and clopidogrel have similar risks of incident diabetes, cardiovascular events, and bleeding events among patients with ASCVD. The choice between these agents may thus be influenced more by factors like cost, patient preference, or tolerance than by clinical outcomes alone.


Persistent Identifierhttp://hdl.handle.net/10722/363864
ISSN
2023 Impact Factor: 6.1
2023 SCImago Journal Rankings: 1.340

 

DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorJu, Chengsheng-
dc.contributor.authorXiong, Xi-
dc.contributor.authorLui, David T.W.-
dc.contributor.authorYan, Vincent K.C.-
dc.contributor.authorAdesuyan, Matthew-
dc.contributor.authorXu, Ming-
dc.contributor.authorHo, Frederick K.-
dc.contributor.authorWong, Carlos K.H.-
dc.contributor.authorWong, Ian C.K.-
dc.contributor.authorChan, Esther W.Y.-
dc.contributor.authorWei, Li-
dc.date.accessioned2025-10-15T00:35:18Z-
dc.date.available2025-10-15T00:35:18Z-
dc.date.issued2025-04-01-
dc.identifier.citationDiabetes Research and Clinical Practice, 2025, v. 222-
dc.identifier.issn0168-8227-
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10722/363864-
dc.description.abstract<p>Aims: To compare the effects of low-dose aspirin and clopidogrel on the risk of incident type 2 diabetes among patients with ASCVD. Methods: This target trial emulation study was performed using the IQVIA Medical Research Data UK primary care database, including adults with an incident first ASCVD event who initiated low-dose aspirin or clopidogrel between 2004 and 2021. We applied an overlap weighting approach to balance treatment groups. The observational analogues of intention-to-treat and per-protocol effects were estimated using pooled logistic regression. Results: A total of 111,292 ASCVD patients who initiated aspirin (n = 78,012) or clopidogrel (n = 33,280) were included. In intention-to-treat analyses, aspirin and clopidogrel had similar risks of diabetes (Hazard ratio [HR] 1.02, 95 % Confidence interval [CI] 0.96 to 1.07), cardiovascular events (1.00, 0.95 to 1.05), and bleeding events (1.02, 0.97 to 1.08). In per-protocol analyses, risks remained comparable for diabetes (1.06, 0.97 to 1.15), cardiovascular events (0.96, 0.89 to 1.03), and bleeding events (1.01, 0.92 to 1.10). Conclusions: Aspirin and clopidogrel have similar risks of incident diabetes, cardiovascular events, and bleeding events among patients with ASCVD. The choice between these agents may thus be influenced more by factors like cost, patient preference, or tolerance than by clinical outcomes alone.</p>-
dc.languageeng-
dc.publisherElsevier-
dc.relation.ispartofDiabetes Research and Clinical Practice-
dc.rightsThis work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.-
dc.subjectAspirin-
dc.subjectAtherosclerotic cardiovascular disease-
dc.subjectTarget trial emulation-
dc.subjectType 2 diabetes-
dc.titleComparative effect of aspirin versus clopidogrel monotherapy on incident type 2 diabetes in patients with atherosclerotic cardiovascular diseases: A target trial emulation study-
dc.typeArticle-
dc.identifier.doi10.1016/j.diabres.2025.112082-
dc.identifier.pmid40064300-
dc.identifier.scopuseid_2-s2.0-86000556799-
dc.identifier.volume222-
dc.identifier.issnl0168-8227-

Export via OAI-PMH Interface in XML Formats


OR


Export to Other Non-XML Formats