File Download

There are no files associated with this item.

  Links for fulltext
     (May Require Subscription)
Supplementary

Article: Cost-effectiveness of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease population screening in China: based on individual data from WHO Collaborating Centre-initiated ‘Enjoying Breathing Program’

TitleCost-effectiveness of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease population screening in China: based on individual data from WHO Collaborating Centre-initiated ‘Enjoying Breathing Program’
Authors
KeywordsChina
Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease
Cost-effectiveness
Enjoying Breathing Program
Population screening
Issue Date1-Dec-2025
PublisherBioMed Central
Citation
BMC Public Health, 2025, v. 25, n. 1 How to Cite?
AbstractBackground: Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) imposes a significant and growing burden on China and the world. Early detection and diagnosis may be an effective way to alleviate this severe pressure on public health. The Enjoying Breathing Program (the Program), a nationwide one-time and two-step COPD screening and management program with long-term follow-up initiated by the World Health Organization Collaborating Centre (WHO CC), has demonstrated its significant clinical benefit. However, the cost-effectiveness of the Program remains unknown. Methods: A lifetime Markov model was developed to compare the cost-effectiveness of the Program of COPD screening to no screening from a Chinese healthcare perspective. Patient-level data, including treatment rate, medication cost, transition probability, etc., were sourced from the Program. Other parameter data were sourced from published literature. Results: Enjoying Breathing Program for COPD screening was proved probably cost-effective compared with no screening in China with an incremental cost of $118, and incremental health benefit gain of 0.021 quality-adjusted life years (QALYs), resulting in an incremental cost-effectiveness ratio (ICER) of $5,679/QALY which was much less than willingness-to-pay (WTP) of 1×Gross Domestic Product (GDP) per capita in 2022 ($11,814). Sensitivity analysis proved the robustness of the results and subgroup analysis demonstrated health benefits varied among different subgroups. Annual screening and higher compliance may further enhance the cost-effectiveness. Conclusions: Despite the underlying uncertainty, annual two-step COPD population screening in China may probably be cost-effective compared with no screening and deserves further large-scale implementation.
Persistent Identifierhttp://hdl.handle.net/10722/366356
ISSN
2023 Impact Factor: 3.5
2023 SCImago Journal Rankings: 1.253

 

DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorZhang, Tiantian-
dc.contributor.authorAi, Jiahuan-
dc.contributor.authorHuang, Ke-
dc.contributor.authorLu, Peiyao-
dc.contributor.authorTang, Xiao-
dc.contributor.authorLei, Jieping-
dc.contributor.authorLi, Xue-
dc.contributor.authorChan, Esther W.-
dc.contributor.authorWen, Qiming-
dc.contributor.authorWen, Xiaoqin-
dc.contributor.authorFang, Fang-
dc.contributor.authorJia, Cunbo-
dc.contributor.authorWong, Ian C.K.-
dc.contributor.authorJiang, Jie-
dc.contributor.authorYang, Ting-
dc.contributor.authorWang, Chen-
dc.date.accessioned2025-11-25T04:18:55Z-
dc.date.available2025-11-25T04:18:55Z-
dc.date.issued2025-12-01-
dc.identifier.citationBMC Public Health, 2025, v. 25, n. 1-
dc.identifier.issn1471-2458-
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10722/366356-
dc.description.abstractBackground: Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) imposes a significant and growing burden on China and the world. Early detection and diagnosis may be an effective way to alleviate this severe pressure on public health. The Enjoying Breathing Program (the Program), a nationwide one-time and two-step COPD screening and management program with long-term follow-up initiated by the World Health Organization Collaborating Centre (WHO CC), has demonstrated its significant clinical benefit. However, the cost-effectiveness of the Program remains unknown. Methods: A lifetime Markov model was developed to compare the cost-effectiveness of the Program of COPD screening to no screening from a Chinese healthcare perspective. Patient-level data, including treatment rate, medication cost, transition probability, etc., were sourced from the Program. Other parameter data were sourced from published literature. Results: Enjoying Breathing Program for COPD screening was proved probably cost-effective compared with no screening in China with an incremental cost of $118, and incremental health benefit gain of 0.021 quality-adjusted life years (QALYs), resulting in an incremental cost-effectiveness ratio (ICER) of $5,679/QALY which was much less than willingness-to-pay (WTP) of 1×Gross Domestic Product (GDP) per capita in 2022 ($11,814). Sensitivity analysis proved the robustness of the results and subgroup analysis demonstrated health benefits varied among different subgroups. Annual screening and higher compliance may further enhance the cost-effectiveness. Conclusions: Despite the underlying uncertainty, annual two-step COPD population screening in China may probably be cost-effective compared with no screening and deserves further large-scale implementation.-
dc.languageeng-
dc.publisherBioMed Central-
dc.relation.ispartofBMC Public Health-
dc.rightsThis work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.-
dc.subjectChina-
dc.subjectChronic obstructive pulmonary disease-
dc.subjectCost-effectiveness-
dc.subjectEnjoying Breathing Program-
dc.subjectPopulation screening-
dc.titleCost-effectiveness of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease population screening in China: based on individual data from WHO Collaborating Centre-initiated ‘Enjoying Breathing Program’-
dc.typeArticle-
dc.identifier.doi10.1186/s12889-025-22506-9-
dc.identifier.pmid40275164-
dc.identifier.scopuseid_2-s2.0-105003640140-
dc.identifier.volume25-
dc.identifier.issue1-
dc.identifier.eissn1471-2458-
dc.identifier.issnl1471-2458-

Export via OAI-PMH Interface in XML Formats


OR


Export to Other Non-XML Formats