File Download

There are no files associated with this item.

  Links for fulltext
     (May Require Subscription)
Supplementary

Article: Situating engineering within the Australian pre-tertiary education system

TitleSituating engineering within the Australian pre-tertiary education system
Authors
KeywordsAustralian Curriculum F-10
Early Years Learning Framework for Australia (EYLF)
Initial teacher education
Makerspaces
Pedagogy
Issue Date1-Dec-2025
PublisherSpringer
Citation
The Australian Educational Researcher, 2025, v. 52, p. 3879-3901 How to Cite?
AbstractA global shortage of engineers is coinciding with an increasing demand for engineering skills. Clear education pathways are needed to attract future engineers who will work across the traditional boundaries of disciplines. This paper explores the visibility of engineering-related learning in pre-tertiary education as a means to spark students’ interests and skills and encourage them to enter engineering as a profession. The national Early Years Learning Framework for Australia (EYLF) and Australian Curriculum, Version 9 for Foundation to Year 10, are analysed as pre-tertiary documents that guide learning from birth to Year 10. Engineering is not explicitly named in the EYLF, but associated behaviours are woven through the document. Within the content of the Australian Curriculum F-10, whilst engineering may be named in the sub-strand title, it is predominantly located in optional elaborations rather than content descriptors. Further, despite shared characteristics of engineering learning identified in the EYLF and the Australian Curriculum, the differing structures of the documents impede the articulation of learning across education contexts. This highlights the need for vertical alignment of guiding documents so that engineering-related learning outcomes and pedagogical approaches build cumulatively through pre-tertiary learning environments. Concerns regarding equity and access are highlighted, as these have implications for workforce participation and the extent to which Australia will be equipped to meet sector demands in a world that increasingly relies on engineering skills.
Persistent Identifierhttp://hdl.handle.net/10722/366476
ISSN
2023 Impact Factor: 2.0
2023 SCImago Journal Rankings: 0.972

 

DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorCohrssen, Caroline-
dc.contributor.authorGuarrella, Cristina-
dc.contributor.authorHebden, Kristen-
dc.contributor.authorQuinn, Frances-
dc.contributor.authorNirmalathas, Ampalavanapillai-
dc.date.accessioned2025-11-25T04:19:37Z-
dc.date.available2025-11-25T04:19:37Z-
dc.date.issued2025-12-01-
dc.identifier.citationThe Australian Educational Researcher, 2025, v. 52, p. 3879-3901-
dc.identifier.issn0311-6999-
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10722/366476-
dc.description.abstractA global shortage of engineers is coinciding with an increasing demand for engineering skills. Clear education pathways are needed to attract future engineers who will work across the traditional boundaries of disciplines. This paper explores the visibility of engineering-related learning in pre-tertiary education as a means to spark students’ interests and skills and encourage them to enter engineering as a profession. The national Early Years Learning Framework for Australia (EYLF) and Australian Curriculum, Version 9 for Foundation to Year 10, are analysed as pre-tertiary documents that guide learning from birth to Year 10. Engineering is not explicitly named in the EYLF, but associated behaviours are woven through the document. Within the content of the Australian Curriculum F-10, whilst engineering may be named in the sub-strand title, it is predominantly located in optional elaborations rather than content descriptors. Further, despite shared characteristics of engineering learning identified in the EYLF and the Australian Curriculum, the differing structures of the documents impede the articulation of learning across education contexts. This highlights the need for vertical alignment of guiding documents so that engineering-related learning outcomes and pedagogical approaches build cumulatively through pre-tertiary learning environments. Concerns regarding equity and access are highlighted, as these have implications for workforce participation and the extent to which Australia will be equipped to meet sector demands in a world that increasingly relies on engineering skills.-
dc.languageeng-
dc.publisherSpringer-
dc.relation.ispartofThe Australian Educational Researcher-
dc.rightsThis work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.-
dc.subjectAustralian Curriculum F-10-
dc.subjectEarly Years Learning Framework for Australia (EYLF)-
dc.subjectInitial teacher education-
dc.subjectMakerspaces-
dc.subjectPedagogy-
dc.titleSituating engineering within the Australian pre-tertiary education system-
dc.typeArticle-
dc.identifier.doi10.1007/s13384-025-00880-y-
dc.identifier.scopuseid_2-s2.0-105011615911-
dc.identifier.volume52-
dc.identifier.spage3879-
dc.identifier.epage3901-
dc.identifier.eissn2210-5328-
dc.identifier.issnl0311-6999-

Export via OAI-PMH Interface in XML Formats


OR


Export to Other Non-XML Formats