File Download
There are no files associated with this item.
Links for fulltext
(May Require Subscription)
- Publisher Website: 10.1016/j.jacc.2025.07.013
- Scopus: eid_2-s2.0-105014364506
- Find via

Supplementary
-
Citations:
- Scopus: 0
- Appears in Collections:
Article: Safety and Effectiveness of Statins for Primary Prevention in Adults With Type 1 Diabetes: An Emulation
| Title | Safety and Effectiveness of Statins for Primary Prevention in Adults With Type 1 Diabetes: An Emulation |
|---|---|
| Authors | |
| Keywords | cardiovascular disease cohort study dyslipidemia effectiveness primary prevention safety statins type 1 diabetes mellitus women |
| Issue Date | 8-Sep-2025 |
| Publisher | Elsevier |
| Citation | Journal of the American College of Cardiology, 2025, v. 86, n. 11, p. 797-809 How to Cite? |
| Abstract | Background: There is no consensus for using statins for primary prevention of cardiovascular disease (CVD) and all-cause mortality in adults with type 1 diabetes mellitus (T1DM), because no randomized controlled trial has exclusively investigated statins in this population. Objectives: In this study, the authors sought to evaluate the long-term risks and benefits of statins for primary prevention in adults with T1DM. Methods: We performed a sequential target trial emulation comparing statin initiation vs noninitiation using UK primary care data from the IQVIA Medical Research Data database. Persons aged 25 to 84 years with a diagnosis record of T1DM with prescription of insulin from January 2005 to December 2016 were included if they had baseline low-density lipoprotein-cholesterol (LDL-C) ≥2.6 mmol/L (100 mg/dL) or non-high-density lipoprotein cholesterol ≥3.4 mmol/L (130 mg/dL). Persons with preexisting coronary artery disease, myocardial infarction, stroke, heart failure, myopathy, liver disease, rheumatic heart disease, schizophrenia or cancer were excluded. Main outcome measures were all-cause mortality, major CVD and adverse events (myopathy and liver dysfunction). We estimated 10-year absolute risk differences (RDs) for the observational analogues of the intention-to-treat (ITT) and per-protocol (PP) effects. Results: We included 4,176 statin initiator (mean age of 45 years, 33.1% <40 years, 40.6% female) and 16,704 noninitiator person-trials with median follow-up of 6 years. Compared with noninitiation, statins were associated with reductions in all-cause mortality (RDITT: −1.66% [95% CI: −2.79% to −0.45%]; RDPP: −3.48% [95% CI: −4.68% to −2.07%]) and major CVD (RDITT: −1.63% [95% CI: −2.57% to −0.53%]; RDPP: −2.69% [95% CI: −4.00% to −1.22%]). Some analyses suggested a slight association with increased risk of liver dysfunction but no association with myopathy. In subgroup analyses, absolute risk reductions were generally larger in women, persons ≥40 years of age, persons with baseline LDL-C ≥3.4 mmol/L (130 mg/dL), and persons with a higher predicted cardiovascular risk. Conclusions: Among adults with T1DM, statin initiation for primary prevention was associated with reductions in all-cause mortality and major CVD with a very low risk of adverse effects. The differences in absolute risk reductions can help guide personalized statin treatment decisions in T1DM. |
| Persistent Identifier | http://hdl.handle.net/10722/366607 |
| ISSN | 2023 Impact Factor: 21.7 2023 SCImago Journal Rankings: 8.762 |
| DC Field | Value | Language |
|---|---|---|
| dc.contributor.author | Blais, Joseph Edgar | - |
| dc.contributor.author | Yan, Vincent Ka Chun | - |
| dc.contributor.author | Chan, Esther Wai Yin | - |
| dc.contributor.author | Wong, Ian Chi Kei | - |
| dc.contributor.author | Wan, Eric Yuk Fai | - |
| dc.date.accessioned | 2025-11-25T04:20:26Z | - |
| dc.date.available | 2025-11-25T04:20:26Z | - |
| dc.date.issued | 2025-09-08 | - |
| dc.identifier.citation | Journal of the American College of Cardiology, 2025, v. 86, n. 11, p. 797-809 | - |
| dc.identifier.issn | 0735-1097 | - |
| dc.identifier.uri | http://hdl.handle.net/10722/366607 | - |
| dc.description.abstract | Background: There is no consensus for using statins for primary prevention of cardiovascular disease (CVD) and all-cause mortality in adults with type 1 diabetes mellitus (T1DM), because no randomized controlled trial has exclusively investigated statins in this population. Objectives: In this study, the authors sought to evaluate the long-term risks and benefits of statins for primary prevention in adults with T1DM. Methods: We performed a sequential target trial emulation comparing statin initiation vs noninitiation using UK primary care data from the IQVIA Medical Research Data database. Persons aged 25 to 84 years with a diagnosis record of T1DM with prescription of insulin from January 2005 to December 2016 were included if they had baseline low-density lipoprotein-cholesterol (LDL-C) ≥2.6 mmol/L (100 mg/dL) or non-high-density lipoprotein cholesterol ≥3.4 mmol/L (130 mg/dL). Persons with preexisting coronary artery disease, myocardial infarction, stroke, heart failure, myopathy, liver disease, rheumatic heart disease, schizophrenia or cancer were excluded. Main outcome measures were all-cause mortality, major CVD and adverse events (myopathy and liver dysfunction). We estimated 10-year absolute risk differences (RDs) for the observational analogues of the intention-to-treat (ITT) and per-protocol (PP) effects. Results: We included 4,176 statin initiator (mean age of 45 years, 33.1% <40 years, 40.6% female) and 16,704 noninitiator person-trials with median follow-up of 6 years. Compared with noninitiation, statins were associated with reductions in all-cause mortality (RDITT: −1.66% [95% CI: −2.79% to −0.45%]; RDPP: −3.48% [95% CI: −4.68% to −2.07%]) and major CVD (RDITT: −1.63% [95% CI: −2.57% to −0.53%]; RDPP: −2.69% [95% CI: −4.00% to −1.22%]). Some analyses suggested a slight association with increased risk of liver dysfunction but no association with myopathy. In subgroup analyses, absolute risk reductions were generally larger in women, persons ≥40 years of age, persons with baseline LDL-C ≥3.4 mmol/L (130 mg/dL), and persons with a higher predicted cardiovascular risk. Conclusions: Among adults with T1DM, statin initiation for primary prevention was associated with reductions in all-cause mortality and major CVD with a very low risk of adverse effects. The differences in absolute risk reductions can help guide personalized statin treatment decisions in T1DM. | - |
| dc.language | eng | - |
| dc.publisher | Elsevier | - |
| dc.relation.ispartof | Journal of the American College of Cardiology | - |
| dc.subject | cardiovascular disease | - |
| dc.subject | cohort study | - |
| dc.subject | dyslipidemia | - |
| dc.subject | effectiveness | - |
| dc.subject | primary prevention | - |
| dc.subject | safety | - |
| dc.subject | statins | - |
| dc.subject | type 1 diabetes mellitus | - |
| dc.subject | women | - |
| dc.title | Safety and Effectiveness of Statins for Primary Prevention in Adults With Type 1 Diabetes: An Emulation | - |
| dc.type | Article | - |
| dc.identifier.doi | 10.1016/j.jacc.2025.07.013 | - |
| dc.identifier.scopus | eid_2-s2.0-105014364506 | - |
| dc.identifier.volume | 86 | - |
| dc.identifier.issue | 11 | - |
| dc.identifier.spage | 797 | - |
| dc.identifier.epage | 809 | - |
| dc.identifier.eissn | 1558-3597 | - |
| dc.identifier.issnl | 0735-1097 | - |
