File Download
Links for fulltext
(May Require Subscription)
- Publisher Website: 10.1093/humrep/deg475
- Scopus: eid_2-s2.0-0242606903
- PMID: 14585880
- WOS: WOS:000186447500015
- Find via
Supplementary
- Citations:
- Appears in Collections:
Article: A prospective, randomized, placebo-controlled trial on the use of mifepristone with sublingual or vaginal misoprostol for medical abortions of less than 9 weeks gestation
Title | A prospective, randomized, placebo-controlled trial on the use of mifepristone with sublingual or vaginal misoprostol for medical abortions of less than 9 weeks gestation |
---|---|
Authors | |
Keywords | Medical abortion Misoprostol Sublingual Vaginal |
Issue Date | 2003 |
Publisher | Oxford University Press. The Journal's web site is located at http://humrep.oxfordjournals.org/ |
Citation | Human Reproduction, 2003, v. 18 n. 11, p. 2315-2318 How to Cite? |
Abstract | Background: A combination of mifepristone and misoprostol provides an effective method of medical abortion for early pregnancy. This is the first randomized trial comparing the use of sublingual misoprostol with vaginal misoprostol in combination with mifepristone for termination of early pregnancies up to 63 days. Methods: A total of 224 women who requested legal termination of pregnancy up to 63 days were randomized by computer-generated list into two groups and given 200 mg of oral mifepristone followed 48 h later by either 800 μg of sublingual (n = 112) or vaginal (n = 112) misoprostol. Results: Complete abortion occurred in 98.2% (95% CI: 93-99) of women in the sublingual group and 93.8% (95% CI: 88-97) in the vaginal group. There were three ongoing pregnancies in the vaginal group but none in the sublingual group. The median duration of vaginal bleeding was 17 days. There was no serious complication. Fever, chills and gastrointestinal side-effects (nausea, vomiting and diarrhoea) were significantly more common in the sublingual group. Conclusions: The combination of mifepristone and misoprostol is effective for medical abortion up to 63 days. Both the sublingual and vaginal are effective routes of administration. Further randomized trials are required to find out the optimal dose of sublingual misoprostol that can give the highest complete abortion rate and lowest incidence of side-effects. |
Persistent Identifier | http://hdl.handle.net/10722/173270 |
ISSN | 2023 Impact Factor: 6.0 2023 SCImago Journal Rankings: 1.852 |
ISI Accession Number ID | |
References |
DC Field | Value | Language |
---|---|---|
dc.contributor.author | Tang, OS | en_US |
dc.contributor.author | Chan, CCW | en_US |
dc.contributor.author | Ng, EHY | en_US |
dc.contributor.author | Lee, SWH | en_US |
dc.contributor.author | Ho, PC | en_US |
dc.date.accessioned | 2012-10-30T06:28:57Z | - |
dc.date.available | 2012-10-30T06:28:57Z | - |
dc.date.issued | 2003 | en_US |
dc.identifier.citation | Human Reproduction, 2003, v. 18 n. 11, p. 2315-2318 | en_US |
dc.identifier.issn | 0268-1161 | en_US |
dc.identifier.uri | http://hdl.handle.net/10722/173270 | - |
dc.description.abstract | Background: A combination of mifepristone and misoprostol provides an effective method of medical abortion for early pregnancy. This is the first randomized trial comparing the use of sublingual misoprostol with vaginal misoprostol in combination with mifepristone for termination of early pregnancies up to 63 days. Methods: A total of 224 women who requested legal termination of pregnancy up to 63 days were randomized by computer-generated list into two groups and given 200 mg of oral mifepristone followed 48 h later by either 800 μg of sublingual (n = 112) or vaginal (n = 112) misoprostol. Results: Complete abortion occurred in 98.2% (95% CI: 93-99) of women in the sublingual group and 93.8% (95% CI: 88-97) in the vaginal group. There were three ongoing pregnancies in the vaginal group but none in the sublingual group. The median duration of vaginal bleeding was 17 days. There was no serious complication. Fever, chills and gastrointestinal side-effects (nausea, vomiting and diarrhoea) were significantly more common in the sublingual group. Conclusions: The combination of mifepristone and misoprostol is effective for medical abortion up to 63 days. Both the sublingual and vaginal are effective routes of administration. Further randomized trials are required to find out the optimal dose of sublingual misoprostol that can give the highest complete abortion rate and lowest incidence of side-effects. | en_US |
dc.language | eng | en_US |
dc.publisher | Oxford University Press. The Journal's web site is located at http://humrep.oxfordjournals.org/ | en_US |
dc.relation.ispartof | Human Reproduction | en_US |
dc.rights | Human Reproduction. Copyright © Oxford University Press. | - |
dc.subject | Medical abortion | - |
dc.subject | Misoprostol | - |
dc.subject | Sublingual | - |
dc.subject | Vaginal | - |
dc.subject.mesh | Abortifacient Agents, Nonsteroidal - Administration & Dosage - Adverse Effects | en_US |
dc.subject.mesh | Abortifacient Agents, Steroidal - Adverse Effects - Therapeutic Use | en_US |
dc.subject.mesh | Abortion, Induced | en_US |
dc.subject.mesh | Administration, Intravaginal | en_US |
dc.subject.mesh | Administration, Sublingual | en_US |
dc.subject.mesh | Adult | en_US |
dc.subject.mesh | Drug Therapy, Combination | en_US |
dc.subject.mesh | Female | en_US |
dc.subject.mesh | Humans | en_US |
dc.subject.mesh | Mifepristone - Adverse Effects - Therapeutic Use | en_US |
dc.subject.mesh | Misoprostol - Administration & Dosage - Adverse Effects | en_US |
dc.subject.mesh | Placebos | en_US |
dc.subject.mesh | Pregnancy | en_US |
dc.subject.mesh | Pregnancy Trimester, First | en_US |
dc.subject.mesh | Treatment Outcome | en_US |
dc.title | A prospective, randomized, placebo-controlled trial on the use of mifepristone with sublingual or vaginal misoprostol for medical abortions of less than 9 weeks gestation | en_US |
dc.type | Article | en_US |
dc.identifier.email | Ng, EHY:nghye@hkucc.hku.hk | en_US |
dc.identifier.email | Ho, PC:pcho@hku.hk | en_US |
dc.identifier.authority | Ng, EHY=rp00426 | en_US |
dc.identifier.authority | Ho, PC=rp00325 | en_US |
dc.description.nature | link_to_OA_fulltext | en_US |
dc.identifier.doi | 10.1093/humrep/deg475 | en_US |
dc.identifier.pmid | 14585880 | - |
dc.identifier.scopus | eid_2-s2.0-0242606903 | en_US |
dc.identifier.hkuros | 88147 | - |
dc.relation.references | http://www.scopus.com/mlt/select.url?eid=2-s2.0-0242606903&selection=ref&src=s&origin=recordpage | en_US |
dc.identifier.volume | 18 | en_US |
dc.identifier.issue | 11 | en_US |
dc.identifier.spage | 2315 | en_US |
dc.identifier.epage | 2318 | en_US |
dc.identifier.isi | WOS:000186447500015 | - |
dc.publisher.place | United Kingdom | en_US |
dc.identifier.scopusauthorid | Tang, OS=7006723402 | en_US |
dc.identifier.scopusauthorid | Chan, CCW=26643394500 | en_US |
dc.identifier.scopusauthorid | Ng, EHY=35238184300 | en_US |
dc.identifier.scopusauthorid | Lee, SWH=26030998000 | en_US |
dc.identifier.scopusauthorid | Ho, PC=7402211440 | en_US |
dc.identifier.issnl | 0268-1161 | - |