File Download

There are no files associated with this item.

  Links for fulltext
     (May Require Subscription)
  • Find via Find It@HKUL

Conference Paper: Combined wedge resection and inferior retractor plication versus combined lateral tarsal strip and inferior retractor plication in involutional entropion

TitleCombined wedge resection and inferior retractor plication versus combined lateral tarsal strip and inferior retractor plication in involutional entropion
Other TitlesComparison of combined wedge resection and inferior retractor plication with combined lateral tarsal strip and inferior retractor plication in involutional entropion
Authors
Issue Date2018
PublisherHong Kong Academy of Medicine Press. The Journal's web site is located at http://www.cohk.org.hk/journals.php
Citation
The 30th Annual Scientific Meeting (ASM) of Hong Kong Ophthalmological Symposium 2018 in conjunction with the 10th Conference of Asia Pacific Society of Ophthalmic Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery (APSOPRS), Hong Kong, 15-16 December 2018. Abstract book in Hong Kong Journal of Ophthalmology, 2018, v. 22 n. 2, Suppl., p. 54 How to Cite?
AbstractPurpose: To compare the effectiveness of combined wedge resection and inferior retractor plication (WR+IRP) based on the Hill’s procedure with combined lateral tarsal strip with inferior retractor plication procedure (LTS + IRP) for the treatment of primary involutional lower eyelid entropion in the Chinese population. Methods: This is a retrospective review of 52 eyelids of 46 patients who underwent WR+IRP and 41 eyelids of 36 patients that underwent LTS + IRP for treatment of involutional entropion between May 2009 and May 2017. Patient demographics, presence of pre-operative laxity, post-operative outcome and presence of complications were all recorded from electronic patient records. Results: Among patients who received combined WR + IRP, none had recurrence of entropion, 1 (2.1%) had residual entropion, 2 eyelids (4.35%) had lower eyelid notching, 1 eyelid (2.17%) had infection and 1 eyelid (2.17%) had overcorrection. In the group of patients with LTS + IRP, 9 eyelids (21.95%) had recurrence and 1 (2.44%) had residual entropion. Patients with LTS + IRP had statistically significantly higher recurrence rate than WR + IRP (p<0.001). The overall success rate was higher in the combined WR + IRP group than the LTS + IRP group (88.24% vs 78.05%), however, it did not reach statistical significance (p=0.189). Conclusion: Both LTS + IRP and WR + IRP are effective surgical procedures for involutional entropion. LTS + IRP has significantly higher recurrence rate. Although the overall success rate is higher in combined WR + IRP, it did not reach statistical significance.
DescriptionPoster Session: Oculoplastics - no. OC-035
Persistent Identifierhttp://hdl.handle.net/10722/266381
ISSN

 

DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorCheung, JJC-
dc.contributor.authorCheung, LTY-
dc.contributor.authorWong, CKH-
dc.date.accessioned2019-01-18T08:18:27Z-
dc.date.available2019-01-18T08:18:27Z-
dc.date.issued2018-
dc.identifier.citationThe 30th Annual Scientific Meeting (ASM) of Hong Kong Ophthalmological Symposium 2018 in conjunction with the 10th Conference of Asia Pacific Society of Ophthalmic Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery (APSOPRS), Hong Kong, 15-16 December 2018. Abstract book in Hong Kong Journal of Ophthalmology, 2018, v. 22 n. 2, Suppl., p. 54-
dc.identifier.issn1027-8230-
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10722/266381-
dc.descriptionPoster Session: Oculoplastics - no. OC-035-
dc.description.abstractPurpose: To compare the effectiveness of combined wedge resection and inferior retractor plication (WR+IRP) based on the Hill’s procedure with combined lateral tarsal strip with inferior retractor plication procedure (LTS + IRP) for the treatment of primary involutional lower eyelid entropion in the Chinese population. Methods: This is a retrospective review of 52 eyelids of 46 patients who underwent WR+IRP and 41 eyelids of 36 patients that underwent LTS + IRP for treatment of involutional entropion between May 2009 and May 2017. Patient demographics, presence of pre-operative laxity, post-operative outcome and presence of complications were all recorded from electronic patient records. Results: Among patients who received combined WR + IRP, none had recurrence of entropion, 1 (2.1%) had residual entropion, 2 eyelids (4.35%) had lower eyelid notching, 1 eyelid (2.17%) had infection and 1 eyelid (2.17%) had overcorrection. In the group of patients with LTS + IRP, 9 eyelids (21.95%) had recurrence and 1 (2.44%) had residual entropion. Patients with LTS + IRP had statistically significantly higher recurrence rate than WR + IRP (p<0.001). The overall success rate was higher in the combined WR + IRP group than the LTS + IRP group (88.24% vs 78.05%), however, it did not reach statistical significance (p=0.189). Conclusion: Both LTS + IRP and WR + IRP are effective surgical procedures for involutional entropion. LTS + IRP has significantly higher recurrence rate. Although the overall success rate is higher in combined WR + IRP, it did not reach statistical significance.-
dc.languageeng-
dc.publisherHong Kong Academy of Medicine Press. The Journal's web site is located at http://www.cohk.org.hk/journals.php-
dc.relation.ispartofHong Kong Journal of Ophthalmology-
dc.relation.ispartofAPSOPRS-ASMHK 2018 (Hong Kong Ophthalmological Symposium 2018 & Conference of Asia Pacific Society of Ophthalmic Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery (APSOPRS)-
dc.rightsHong Kong Journal of Ophthalmology. Copyright © Hong Kong Academy of Medicine Press.-
dc.titleCombined wedge resection and inferior retractor plication versus combined lateral tarsal strip and inferior retractor plication in involutional entropion-
dc.title.alternativeComparison of combined wedge resection and inferior retractor plication with combined lateral tarsal strip and inferior retractor plication in involutional entropion-
dc.typeConference_Paper-
dc.identifier.emailCheung, JJC: janicejc@hku.hk-
dc.identifier.emailWong, CKH: carlosho@hku.hk-
dc.identifier.authorityCheung, JJC=rp02219-
dc.identifier.authorityWong, CKH=rp01931-
dc.identifier.hkuros296732-
dc.identifier.volume22-
dc.identifier.issue2, Suppl.-
dc.identifier.spage54-
dc.identifier.epage54-
dc.publisher.placeHong Kong-
dc.identifier.issnl1027-8230-

Export via OAI-PMH Interface in XML Formats


OR


Export to Other Non-XML Formats