File Download
There are no files associated with this item.
Links for fulltext
(May Require Subscription)
- Publisher Website: 10.1093/cid/ciz1034
- Scopus: eid_2-s2.0-85094684536
- WOS: WOS:000593002000042
- Find via
Supplementary
- Citations:
- Appears in Collections:
Article: Comparative Immunogenicity of Several Enhanced Influenza Vaccine Options for Older Adults: A Randomized, Controlled Trial
Title | Comparative Immunogenicity of Several Enhanced Influenza Vaccine Options for Older Adults: A Randomized, Controlled Trial |
---|---|
Authors | |
Keywords | influenza vaccination public health |
Issue Date | 2020 |
Publisher | Oxford University Press. The Journal's web site is located at http://www.oxfordjournals.org/our_journals/cid/ |
Citation | Clinical Infectious Diseases, 2020, 71 n. 7, p. 1704-1714 How to Cite? |
Abstract | Background:
Enhanced influenza vaccines may improve protection for older adults, but comparative immunogenicity data are limited. Our objective was to examine immune responses to enhanced influenza vaccines, compared to standard-dose vaccines, in community-dwelling older adults.
Methods:
Community-dwelling older adults aged 65–82 years in Hong Kong were randomly allocated (October 2017–January 2018) to receive 2017–2018 Northern hemisphere formulations of a standard-dose quadrivalent vaccine, MF59-adjuvanted trivalent vaccine, high-dose trivalent vaccine, or recombinant-hemagglutinin (rHA) quadrivalent vaccine. Sera collected from 200 recipients of each vaccine before and at 30-days postvaccination were assessed for antibodies to egg-propagated vaccine strains by hemagglutination inhibition (HAI) and to cell-propagated A/Hong Kong/4801/2014(H3N2) virus by microneutralization (MN). Influenza-specific CD4+ and CD8+ T cell responses were assessed in 20 participants per group.
Results:
Mean fold rises (MFR) in HAI titers to egg-propagated A(H1N1) and A(H3N2) and the MFR in MN to cell-propagated A(H3N2) were statistically significantly higher in the enhanced vaccine groups, compared to the standard-dose vaccine. The MFR in MN to cell-propagated A(H3N2) was highest among rHA recipients (4.7), followed by high-dose (3.4) and MF59-adjuvanted (2.9) recipients, compared to standard-dose recipients (2.3). Similarly, the ratio of postvaccination MN titers among rHA recipients to cell-propagated A(H3N2) recipients was 2.57-fold higher than the standard-dose vaccine, which was statistically higher than the high-dose (1.33-fold) and MF59-adjuvanted (1.43-fold) recipient ratios. Enhanced vaccines also resulted in the boosting of T-cell responses.
Conclusions:
In this head-to-head comparison, older adults receiving enhanced vaccines showed improved humoral and cell-mediated immune responses, compared to standard-dose vaccine recipients.
Clinical Trials Registration:
NCT03330132. |
Description | Link to Free access |
Persistent Identifier | http://hdl.handle.net/10722/281981 |
ISSN | 2023 Impact Factor: 8.2 2023 SCImago Journal Rankings: 3.308 |
ISI Accession Number ID |
DC Field | Value | Language |
---|---|---|
dc.contributor.author | Cowling, BJ | - |
dc.contributor.author | Perera, RAPM | - |
dc.contributor.author | Valenburg, SA | - |
dc.contributor.author | Leung, NHL | - |
dc.contributor.author | Iuliano, AD | - |
dc.contributor.author | Tam, YH | - |
dc.contributor.author | Wong, JHF | - |
dc.contributor.author | Fang, VJ | - |
dc.contributor.author | Li, APY | - |
dc.contributor.author | So, HC | - |
dc.contributor.author | Ip, DKM | - |
dc.contributor.author | Azziz-Baumgartner, E | - |
dc.contributor.author | Fry, AM | - |
dc.contributor.author | Levine, MZ | - |
dc.contributor.author | Gangappa, S | - |
dc.contributor.author | Sambhara, S | - |
dc.contributor.author | Barr, IG | - |
dc.contributor.author | Skowronski, DM | - |
dc.contributor.author | Peiris, JSM | - |
dc.contributor.author | Thompson, MG | - |
dc.date.accessioned | 2020-04-19T03:33:42Z | - |
dc.date.available | 2020-04-19T03:33:42Z | - |
dc.date.issued | 2020 | - |
dc.identifier.citation | Clinical Infectious Diseases, 2020, 71 n. 7, p. 1704-1714 | - |
dc.identifier.issn | 1058-4838 | - |
dc.identifier.uri | http://hdl.handle.net/10722/281981 | - |
dc.description | Link to Free access | - |
dc.description.abstract | Background: Enhanced influenza vaccines may improve protection for older adults, but comparative immunogenicity data are limited. Our objective was to examine immune responses to enhanced influenza vaccines, compared to standard-dose vaccines, in community-dwelling older adults. Methods: Community-dwelling older adults aged 65–82 years in Hong Kong were randomly allocated (October 2017–January 2018) to receive 2017–2018 Northern hemisphere formulations of a standard-dose quadrivalent vaccine, MF59-adjuvanted trivalent vaccine, high-dose trivalent vaccine, or recombinant-hemagglutinin (rHA) quadrivalent vaccine. Sera collected from 200 recipients of each vaccine before and at 30-days postvaccination were assessed for antibodies to egg-propagated vaccine strains by hemagglutination inhibition (HAI) and to cell-propagated A/Hong Kong/4801/2014(H3N2) virus by microneutralization (MN). Influenza-specific CD4+ and CD8+ T cell responses were assessed in 20 participants per group. Results: Mean fold rises (MFR) in HAI titers to egg-propagated A(H1N1) and A(H3N2) and the MFR in MN to cell-propagated A(H3N2) were statistically significantly higher in the enhanced vaccine groups, compared to the standard-dose vaccine. The MFR in MN to cell-propagated A(H3N2) was highest among rHA recipients (4.7), followed by high-dose (3.4) and MF59-adjuvanted (2.9) recipients, compared to standard-dose recipients (2.3). Similarly, the ratio of postvaccination MN titers among rHA recipients to cell-propagated A(H3N2) recipients was 2.57-fold higher than the standard-dose vaccine, which was statistically higher than the high-dose (1.33-fold) and MF59-adjuvanted (1.43-fold) recipient ratios. Enhanced vaccines also resulted in the boosting of T-cell responses. Conclusions: In this head-to-head comparison, older adults receiving enhanced vaccines showed improved humoral and cell-mediated immune responses, compared to standard-dose vaccine recipients. Clinical Trials Registration: NCT03330132. | - |
dc.language | eng | - |
dc.publisher | Oxford University Press. The Journal's web site is located at http://www.oxfordjournals.org/our_journals/cid/ | - |
dc.relation.ispartof | Clinical Infectious Diseases | - |
dc.rights | Pre-print: Journal Title] ©: [year] [owner as specified on the article] Published by Oxford University Press [on behalf of xxxxxx]. All rights reserved. Pre-print (Once an article is published, preprint notice should be amended to): This is an electronic version of an article published in [include the complete citation information for the final version of the Article as published in the print edition of the Journal.] Post-print: This is a pre-copy-editing, author-produced PDF of an article accepted for publication in [insert journal title] following peer review. The definitive publisher-authenticated version [insert complete citation information here] is available online at: xxxxxxx [insert URL that the author will receive upon publication here]. | - |
dc.subject | influenza | - |
dc.subject | vaccination | - |
dc.subject | public health | - |
dc.title | Comparative Immunogenicity of Several Enhanced Influenza Vaccine Options for Older Adults: A Randomized, Controlled Trial | - |
dc.type | Article | - |
dc.identifier.email | Cowling, BJ: bcowling@hku.hk | - |
dc.identifier.email | Perera, RAPM: mahenp@hku.hk | - |
dc.identifier.email | Valenburg, SA: sophiev@hku.hk | - |
dc.identifier.email | Leung, NHL: nanleung@connect.hku.hk | - |
dc.identifier.email | Tam, YH: yhtam@hku.hk | - |
dc.identifier.email | So, HC: haso9150@hku.hk | - |
dc.identifier.email | Ip, DKM: dkmip@hku.hk | - |
dc.identifier.email | Peiris, JSM: malik@hkucc.hku.hk | - |
dc.identifier.authority | Cowling, BJ=rp01326 | - |
dc.identifier.authority | Perera, RAPM=rp02500 | - |
dc.identifier.authority | Valenburg, SA=rp02141 | - |
dc.identifier.authority | Leung, NHL=rp02637 | - |
dc.identifier.authority | Tam, YH=rp01881 | - |
dc.identifier.authority | Ip, DKM=rp00256 | - |
dc.identifier.authority | Peiris, JSM=rp00410 | - |
dc.description.nature | link_to_subscribed_fulltext | - |
dc.identifier.doi | 10.1093/cid/ciz1034 | - |
dc.identifier.scopus | eid_2-s2.0-85094684536 | - |
dc.identifier.hkuros | 309701 | - |
dc.identifier.volume | 71 | - |
dc.identifier.issue | 7 | - |
dc.identifier.spage | 1704 | - |
dc.identifier.epage | 1714 | - |
dc.identifier.isi | WOS:000593002000042 | - |
dc.publisher.place | United States | - |
dc.identifier.issnl | 1058-4838 | - |