File Download
Links for fulltext
(May Require Subscription)
- Publisher Website: 10.1111/eje.12718
- Scopus: eid_2-s2.0-85116098731
- PMID: 34528742
- WOS: WOS:000703075400001
- Find via
Supplementary
- Citations:
- Appears in Collections:
Article: 3‐Dimensional simulations and student learning in orthodontic education
Title | 3‐Dimensional simulations and student learning in orthodontic education |
---|---|
Authors | |
Keywords | blended learning case-based learning E-learning electronic dental models orthodontic education simulation |
Issue Date | 2022 |
Publisher | Wiley. The Journal's web site is located at http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/journal/10.1111/(ISSN)1600-0579 |
Citation | European Journal of Dental Education, 2022, v. 26 n. 3, p. 435-445 How to Cite? |
Abstract | Introduction The electronic dental model (e-model) is an example of a digital 3-Dimensional technology to support inquiry-based learning in undergraduate dental education. As student perceptions of and engagement with e-models vary, it is uncertain whether these perceptions have implications for their learning processes and outcomes. Methods Third-year dental students (N=40) completed a questionnaire to identify their perceptions of and preferences for model modalities. They were divided into three groups based on their preference: Preferring plaster models(Group 1); Preferring e-models(Group 2); No preference(Group 3). Students from three groups (N=9) attended a hands-on digital occlusion evaluation workshop, and then completed a case-based diagnostic evaluation test using digital occlusion evaluation software. Camtasia Studio™ recorded real-time and on-screen data of the number of mouse-clicks and time spent. Results Students reported positive feedbacks on the use of e-models, and 72.5% of the students preferred combination use of e-models and plaster models. After attending the hands-on digital dental occlusion evaluation workshop, Group 2 scored higher on the diagnostic evaluation test (p<0.05) and registered more mouse-clicks than Group 1 when evaluating the arch symmetry (p<0.05). Group 2 registered fewer mouse-clicks than Group 3during tooth size measurement (p<0.05). There was no significant difference regarding the time used to answer the knowledge questions among the three groups. Conclusion Undergraduate dental students indicated a generally high acceptance of e-models for their learning in orthodontics, and more prefer a blended approach. Students preferring e-models presented higher performance outcomes, which supports cognitive load theory regarding prior exposure to simulation-based environments. |
Persistent Identifier | http://hdl.handle.net/10722/304926 |
ISSN | 2023 Impact Factor: 1.7 2023 SCImago Journal Rankings: 0.633 |
ISI Accession Number ID |
DC Field | Value | Language |
---|---|---|
dc.contributor.author | Ho, CY | - |
dc.contributor.author | Liao, CS | - |
dc.contributor.author | Lu, JJ | - |
dc.contributor.author | Shan, ZY | - |
dc.contributor.author | Gu, M | - |
dc.contributor.author | Bridges, SM | - |
dc.contributor.author | Yang, Y | - |
dc.date.accessioned | 2021-10-05T02:37:13Z | - |
dc.date.available | 2021-10-05T02:37:13Z | - |
dc.date.issued | 2022 | - |
dc.identifier.citation | European Journal of Dental Education, 2022, v. 26 n. 3, p. 435-445 | - |
dc.identifier.issn | 1396-5883 | - |
dc.identifier.uri | http://hdl.handle.net/10722/304926 | - |
dc.description.abstract | Introduction The electronic dental model (e-model) is an example of a digital 3-Dimensional technology to support inquiry-based learning in undergraduate dental education. As student perceptions of and engagement with e-models vary, it is uncertain whether these perceptions have implications for their learning processes and outcomes. Methods Third-year dental students (N=40) completed a questionnaire to identify their perceptions of and preferences for model modalities. They were divided into three groups based on their preference: Preferring plaster models(Group 1); Preferring e-models(Group 2); No preference(Group 3). Students from three groups (N=9) attended a hands-on digital occlusion evaluation workshop, and then completed a case-based diagnostic evaluation test using digital occlusion evaluation software. Camtasia Studio™ recorded real-time and on-screen data of the number of mouse-clicks and time spent. Results Students reported positive feedbacks on the use of e-models, and 72.5% of the students preferred combination use of e-models and plaster models. After attending the hands-on digital dental occlusion evaluation workshop, Group 2 scored higher on the diagnostic evaluation test (p<0.05) and registered more mouse-clicks than Group 1 when evaluating the arch symmetry (p<0.05). Group 2 registered fewer mouse-clicks than Group 3during tooth size measurement (p<0.05). There was no significant difference regarding the time used to answer the knowledge questions among the three groups. Conclusion Undergraduate dental students indicated a generally high acceptance of e-models for their learning in orthodontics, and more prefer a blended approach. Students preferring e-models presented higher performance outcomes, which supports cognitive load theory regarding prior exposure to simulation-based environments. | - |
dc.language | eng | - |
dc.publisher | Wiley. The Journal's web site is located at http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/journal/10.1111/(ISSN)1600-0579 | - |
dc.relation.ispartof | European Journal of Dental Education | - |
dc.rights | Submitted (preprint) Version This is the pre-peer reviewed version of the following article: [FULL CITE], which has been published in final form at [Link to final article using the DOI]. This article may be used for non-commercial purposes in accordance with Wiley Terms and Conditions for Use of Self-Archived Versions. Accepted (peer-reviewed) Version This is the peer reviewed version of the following article: [FULL CITE], which has been published in final form at [Link to final article using the DOI]. This article may be used for non-commercial purposes in accordance with Wiley Terms and Conditions for Use of Self-Archived Versions. | - |
dc.rights | This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License. | - |
dc.subject | blended learning | - |
dc.subject | case-based learning | - |
dc.subject | E-learning | - |
dc.subject | electronic dental models | - |
dc.subject | orthodontic education | - |
dc.subject | simulation | - |
dc.title | 3‐Dimensional simulations and student learning in orthodontic education | - |
dc.type | Article | - |
dc.identifier.email | Gu, M: drgumin@hku.hk | - |
dc.identifier.email | Bridges, SM: sbridges@hku.hk | - |
dc.identifier.email | Yang, Y: yangyanq@hku.hk | - |
dc.identifier.authority | Gu, M=rp01892 | - |
dc.identifier.authority | Bridges, SM=rp00048 | - |
dc.identifier.authority | Yang, Y=rp00045 | - |
dc.description.nature | published_or_final_version | - |
dc.identifier.doi | 10.1111/eje.12718 | - |
dc.identifier.pmid | 34528742 | - |
dc.identifier.scopus | eid_2-s2.0-85116098731 | - |
dc.identifier.hkuros | 325906 | - |
dc.identifier.volume | 26 | - |
dc.identifier.issue | 3 | - |
dc.identifier.spage | 435 | - |
dc.identifier.epage | 445 | - |
dc.identifier.isi | WOS:000703075400001 | - |