File Download
  Links for fulltext
     (May Require Subscription)

Article: Comparing the effectiveness of molnupiravir and nirmatrelvir-ritonavir in non-hospitalized and hospitalized COVID-19 patients with type 2 diabetes: A target trial emulation study

TitleComparing the effectiveness of molnupiravir and nirmatrelvir-ritonavir in non-hospitalized and hospitalized COVID-19 patients with type 2 diabetes: A target trial emulation study
Authors
Keywordseffectiveness
pharmacoepidemiology
real-world evidence
type 2 diabetes
Issue Date7-Aug-2024
PublisherWiley-Blackwell
Citation
Diabetes, Obesity and Metabolism, 2024, p. 1-12 How to Cite?
Abstract

Aims: To compare the effectiveness of molnupiravir and nirmatrelvir-ritonavir for non-hospitalized and hospitalized COVID-19 patients with type 2 diabetes (T2DM). Materials and Methods: Territory-wide electronic health records in Hong Kong were used to perform target trial emulation using a sequential trial approach. Patients (1) aged ≥18 years, (2) with T2DM, (3) with COVID-19 infection, and (4) who received molnupiravir or nirmatrelvir-ritonavir within 5 days of infection between 16 March 2022 and 31 December 2022 in non-hospital and hospital settings were included. Molnupiravir and nirmatrelvir-ritonavir initiators were matched using one-to-one propensity-score matching and followed for 28 days. Risk of outcomes was compared between groups by Cox regression adjusted for baseline characteristics. Subgroup analyses were performed on age (<70 years, ≥70 years), sex, Charlson comorbidity index (<4, ≥4), and number of COVID-19 vaccine doses (<2 doses, ≥2 doses). Results: Totals of 17 974 non-hospitalized (8987 in each group) and 3678 hospitalized (1839 in each group) patients were identified. Non-hospitalized nirmatrelvir-ritonavir initiators had lower risk of all-cause mortality (absolute risk reduction [ARR] at 28 days 0.80%, 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.56–1.04; hazard ratio [HR] 0.47, 95% CI 0.30–0.73) and hospitalization (ARR at 28 days 4.01%, 95% CI 3.19–4.83; HR 0.73, 95% CI 0.66–0.82) as compared with molnupiravir initiators. Hospitalized nirmatrelvir-ritonavir initiators had reduced risk of all-cause mortality (ARR at 28 days 2.94%, 95% CI 1.65–4.23; HR 0.56, 95% CI 0.40–0.80) as compared with molnupiravir initiators. Consistent findings were found across all subgroups. Conclusions: The use of nirmatrelvir-ritonavir may be preferred to molnupiravir for COVID-19 patients with T2DM and without contraindication to either treatment.


Persistent Identifierhttp://hdl.handle.net/10722/345730
ISSN
2023 Impact Factor: 5.4
2023 SCImago Journal Rankings: 2.079

 

DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorWan, Eric YF-
dc.contributor.authorWong, Zoey CT-
dc.contributor.authorYan, Vincent KC-
dc.contributor.authorChui, Celine SL-
dc.contributor.authorLai, Francisco TT-
dc.contributor.authorLi, Xue-
dc.contributor.authorWong, Ian CK-
dc.contributor.authorChan, Esther WY-
dc.date.accessioned2024-08-27T09:10:48Z-
dc.date.available2024-08-27T09:10:48Z-
dc.date.issued2024-08-07-
dc.identifier.citationDiabetes, Obesity and Metabolism, 2024, p. 1-12-
dc.identifier.issn1462-8902-
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10722/345730-
dc.description.abstract<p>Aims: To compare the effectiveness of molnupiravir and nirmatrelvir-ritonavir for non-hospitalized and hospitalized COVID-19 patients with type 2 diabetes (T2DM). Materials and Methods: Territory-wide electronic health records in Hong Kong were used to perform target trial emulation using a sequential trial approach. Patients (1) aged ≥18 years, (2) with T2DM, (3) with COVID-19 infection, and (4) who received molnupiravir or nirmatrelvir-ritonavir within 5 days of infection between 16 March 2022 and 31 December 2022 in non-hospital and hospital settings were included. Molnupiravir and nirmatrelvir-ritonavir initiators were matched using one-to-one propensity-score matching and followed for 28 days. Risk of outcomes was compared between groups by Cox regression adjusted for baseline characteristics. Subgroup analyses were performed on age (<70 years, ≥70 years), sex, Charlson comorbidity index (<4, ≥4), and number of COVID-19 vaccine doses (<2 doses, ≥2 doses). Results: Totals of 17 974 non-hospitalized (8987 in each group) and 3678 hospitalized (1839 in each group) patients were identified. Non-hospitalized nirmatrelvir-ritonavir initiators had lower risk of all-cause mortality (absolute risk reduction [ARR] at 28 days 0.80%, 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.56–1.04; hazard ratio [HR] 0.47, 95% CI 0.30–0.73) and hospitalization (ARR at 28 days 4.01%, 95% CI 3.19–4.83; HR 0.73, 95% CI 0.66–0.82) as compared with molnupiravir initiators. Hospitalized nirmatrelvir-ritonavir initiators had reduced risk of all-cause mortality (ARR at 28 days 2.94%, 95% CI 1.65–4.23; HR 0.56, 95% CI 0.40–0.80) as compared with molnupiravir initiators. Consistent findings were found across all subgroups. Conclusions: The use of nirmatrelvir-ritonavir may be preferred to molnupiravir for COVID-19 patients with T2DM and without contraindication to either treatment.</p>-
dc.languageeng-
dc.publisherWiley-Blackwell-
dc.relation.ispartofDiabetes, Obesity and Metabolism-
dc.rightsThis work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.-
dc.subjecteffectiveness-
dc.subjectpharmacoepidemiology-
dc.subjectreal-world evidence-
dc.subjecttype 2 diabetes-
dc.titleComparing the effectiveness of molnupiravir and nirmatrelvir-ritonavir in non-hospitalized and hospitalized COVID-19 patients with type 2 diabetes: A target trial emulation study-
dc.typeArticle-
dc.description.naturepublished_or_final_version-
dc.identifier.doi10.1111/dom.15830-
dc.identifier.scopuseid_2-s2.0-85200549223-
dc.identifier.spage1-
dc.identifier.epage12-
dc.identifier.eissn1463-1326-
dc.identifier.issnl1462-8902-

Export via OAI-PMH Interface in XML Formats


OR


Export to Other Non-XML Formats